Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Birth Defects in India pp 143–167Cite as

Magnitude of Congenital Anomalies in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Epidemiological data on birth defects is usually derived from surveillance systems. Systematic surveillance for birth defects is yet to be established in India. Data on the magnitude and trends of birth defects have to be derived from other sources, primarily research studies. This review provides an overview of sources of data on congenital anomalies in India, and the magnitude, mortality and disability associated with these conditions in the country. Available data indicate a birth prevalence of 18.44–23.05 per 1000 births, which translates into 472,177 and 581,899 affected births occurring annually in the country. Estimates of congenital anomaly neonatal mortality range from 54,000 to 99,000. Epidemiological data identify that as congenital anomaly mortality is averted, the numbers of disability survivors increase. Data from limited studies suggest that 70% of birth defects are non-fatal. The Modell Global Database of Congenital Disorders estimates that there would be over 150,000 survivors with congenital disability at five years of age per birth cohort. The review identifies the need for a nation-wide birth defects surveillance system for monitoring these large numbers in India. The Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram, a community-based screening and early identification programme for common childhood diseases, nutritional deficiencies, birth defects and developmental delays and disabilities, is a potential opportunity for collecting nation-wide data on birth defects. Till surveillance is established, robust primary studies are needed, that can inform the true prevalence of congenital anomaly affected births, mortality and survivors with disability. Strategically established population-based surveillance can be utilized to monitor the types and prevalence of congenital anomalies in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mai CT, Isenburg JL, Canfield MA et al (2019) National population‐based estimates for major birth defects, 2010–2014. Birth Defects Res 111(18):1420–1435

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lanzoni M, Morris J, Garne E et al (2017) European monitoring of congenital anomalies. JRC-EUROCAT report on statistical monitoring of congenital anomalies (2006–2015). EUR 29010 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. ISBN 978-92-79-77305-1. https://doi.org/10.2760/157556, PUBSY No. JRC109868. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC109868/kjna29010enn.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2018

  3. Gibson CS, Scott H, Rice R, Scheil W (2017) Birth defects in South Australia 2013. SA Birth Defects Register, Women’s and Children’s Health Network, Adelaide. Available at https://www.wch.sa.gov.au/services/az/other/phru/documents/2013_sabdr_annual_report.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2018

  4. Correa‐Villaseñor A, Cragan J, Kucik J, O’Leary L, Siffel C, Williams L (2003) The metropolitan Atlanta congenital defects program: 35 years of birth defects surveillance at the centers for disease control and prevention. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol 67(9):617–624

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mai CT, Kirby RS, Correa A, Rosenberg D, Petros M, Fagen MC (2016) Public health practice of population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract 22(3):E1–E8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Botto LD, Robert-Gnansia E, Siffel C, Harris J, Borman B, Mastroiacovo P (2006) Fostering international collaboration in birth defects research and prevention: a perspective from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Am J Public Health 96(5):774–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Irgens LM (2000) The medical birth registry of Norway. Epidemiological research and surveillance throughout 30 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Spec Issue Rev 79(6):435–439

    Google Scholar 

  8. Groisman B, Bidondo MP, Gili JA, Barbero P, Liascovich R (2013) Strategies to achieve sustainability and quality in birth defects registries: the experience of the National Registry of Congenital Anomalies of Argentina. J Registry Manag 40(1):29–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Birth defects surveillance: a manual for programme managers, second edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

    Google Scholar 

  10. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. SRS statistical report 2017. In: Estimates of mortality indicators, Chap 4. Available at https://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Report_2017/11.%20Chap%204-Estimates%20of%20Mortality%20Indicators-2017.pdf. Accessed April 2021

  11. UNICEF, WHO, World Bank, UN-DESA Population Division. Levels and trends in child mortality report 2019. Estimates developed by the UN Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Available at https://www.unicef.org/media/60561/file/UN-IGME-child-mortality-report-2019.pdf. Accessed Sept 2018

  12. Hug L, Alexander M, You D, UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (2019) National, regional, and global levels and trends in neonatal mortality between 1990 and 2017, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 7(6):e710–e720

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bhide P, Kar A (2018) A national estimate of the birth prevalence of congenital anomalies in India: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr 18(1):175

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bhide P, Gund P, Kar A (2016) Prevalence of congenital anomalies in an Indian maternal cohort: healthcare, prevention, and surveillance implications. PLoS ONE 11(11):e0166408

    Google Scholar 

  15. Modell B, Darlison MW, Moorthie S, Blencowe H, Petrou M, Lawn J (2016) Epidemiological methods in community genetics and the Modell Global Database of Congenital Disorders (MGDb). Available at https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1532179/17/Epidemiological%20Methods%20in%20Community%20Genetics%20and%20the%20Modell%20Global%20Database%202017-04.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2018

  16. Christianson A, Howson CP, Modell B (2006) March of Dimes global report on birth defects: the hidden toll of dying and disabled children. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, White Plains

    Google Scholar 

  17. Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, National Health Mission (2013) Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram. A child health screening and early intervention services under NRHM. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Available at https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/RBSK/Operational_Guidelines/Operational%20Guidelines_RBSK.pdf. Accessed 6 Aug 2019

  18. Singh AK, Kumar R, Mishra CK, Khera A, Srivastava A (2015) Moving from survival to healthy survival through child health screening and early intervention services under Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK). Indian J Pediatr 82(11):1012–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (2019) Answers data of Rajya Sabha questions for session 240/year wise physical status Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) during 2014–15 and 2015–16. Available at https://data.gov.in/node/3978901/download. Accessed 18 Nov 2019

  20. Birth Defects Registry of India. Available at https://fcrf.org.in/bdri_abus.asp. Accessed 11 Oct 2017

  21. SEAR NBBD newborn and birth defects surveillance initiative. https://origin.searo.who.int/entity/child_adolescent/nbbd/web/en/#:~:text=In%202014%2C%20WHO%2DSEARO%20created,for%20submission%20to%20the%20system. Accessed 6 Aug 2019

  22. Office of the Registrar General India. Report on medical certification of cause of death 2017 Available at https://censusindia.gov.in/2011-Documents/mccd_Report1/MCCD_Report-2017.pdf. Accessed Dec 2018

  23. Fadel SA, Rasaily R, Awasthi S, Begum R, Black RE, Gelband H et al (2017) Changes in cause-specific neonatal and 1–59-month child mortality in India from 2000 to 2015: a nationally representative survey. Lancet 390(10106):1972–1980

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu L, Chu Y, Oza S, Hogan D, Perin J, Bassani DG et al (2019) National, regional, and state-level all-cause and cause-specific under-5 mortality in India in 2000–15: a systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Glob Health 7(6):e721–e734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dandona R, Kumar GA, Henry NJ et al (2020) Subnational mapping of under-5 and neonatal mortality trends in India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2000–17. Lancet 395(10237):1640–1658

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ujagare D, Kar A (2021) Birth defect mortality in India 1990–2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease data. J Community Genet 12(1):81–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-020-00487-z. Epub 2020 Oct 15. PMID: 33063164; PMCID: PMC7846616

  27. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. Persons with disabilities in India. NSS report no. 583 (76/26/1), July–Dec 2018. Available at https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Report_583_Final_0.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2018

  28. Fall CHD (2018) Nutrition in fetal life and childhood and its linkage with adult non-communicable disease: lessons from birth cohort studies in India. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 84(4):881–889

    Google Scholar 

  29. Botto LD, Mastroiacovo P (2018) Triple surveillance: a proposal for an integrated strategy to support and accelerate birth defect prevention. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1414(1):126–136

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nagarajan TJP, Goel S (2016) Is mother and child tracking system (MCTS) on the right track? An experience from a northern state of India. Indian J Public Health 60(1):34–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gera R, Muthusamy N, Bahulekar A, Sharma A, Singh P, Sekhar A, Singh V (2015) An in-depth assessment of India’s mother and child tracking system (MCTS) in Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. BMC Health Serv Res 15(1):315

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Birth Defects and Childhood Disability Research Centre, Pune, 411020, India

    Anita Kar

  2. ICMR—National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, 411026, India

    Dhammasagar Ujagare

Authors
  1. Anita Kar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dhammasagar Ujagare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Birth Defects and Childhood Disability Research Centre, Pune, India

    Anita Kar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kar, A., Ujagare, D. (2021). Magnitude of Congenital Anomalies in India. In: Kar, A. (eds) Birth Defects in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1554-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1554-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1553-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1554-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation