Skip to main content

Religion and Spirituality in Hungarian Eco-Villages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 363 Accesses

Abstract

Sustainability discourses and criticisms of modernization speak to spiritual and moral crises as well as ecological, economic and social ones. Beyond a green ideology, the inhabitants of Hungarian eco-villages are involved with a variety of other worldviews and groups related to the supernatural: with traditional religions, new religious communities, different kinds of spiritual movements and to groups that are committed to what their members consider to be traditional, ancient Hungarian culture alike. Each community is characterized by the presence of elements of eco-spirituality, a holistic attitude and nature faith at some level. In this paper, I discuss the role of religion, belief and spirituality in the life of Hungarian eco-villages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The concept of integrative spirituality religion is comprised of elements of official, folk and individual faith. See Bowman (2009).

  2. 2.

    Like many other small settlements in Hungary, Visnyeszéplak does not have its own priest.

  3. 3.

    One important reason for not finding a unified nature faith in Hungarian eco-villages is to be found in how they conceptualize nature: There are two dominant understandings of nature in these communities. For some, nature is an ethos, while for others it is an autonomous entity that is more or less independent of human society. For more detail on these questions, see: Aitamurto and Simpson (2013), Farkas (2018), Ivakhiv (2005).

References

  • Aitamurto, K., & Simpson, S. (Eds.). (2013). Modern Pagan and Native Faith Movements in Central and Eastern Europe. Durham: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, M. (1996). The philosophy of social ecology: Essays on dialectical naturalism. Montreal: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, M. (2009). From Glastonbury to Hungary: Contemporary integrative spirituality and vernacular religion in context. In G. Vargyas (Ed.), Passageways: From Hungarian ethnography to European ethnology and sociocultural anthropology (pp. 195−221). Budapest−Pécs: Department of European Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, The University of Pécs—L’Harmattan Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall, B. (1995). The ecological self. In A. Drengson & Y. Inoue (Eds.), The deep ecology movement (pp. 101–123). Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domaniczky, O., & Kuslits, B. (2020). Megújítod a Föld színét. Szentignáci lelkiségi gyakorlatok Isten, ember, természet hármasában. Budapest: Ignáci Pedagógiai Műhely. http://ignacipedagogia.hu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/lelkieszkoz_v2.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2020.

  • Drengson, A., & Devall, B. (Eds.). (2010). The ecology of wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess. Berkeley: Counterpoint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2001). Culture sits in places: Reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization. Political Geography, 20, 139–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0962-6298(00)00064-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas J. (2009). „Krisna egyik kertje.” Hitorientált életmód és környezet-átalakítás Somogyvámoson [One of Krishna’s gardens: Faith-oreinted lifestyle and the transformation of the environment]. In B. Andrásfalvy (Ed.), Antropogén ökológiai változások a Kárpát-medencében (pp. 331−346). Budapest: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, J. (2016). ‘Where is the large garden that awaits me?’: Critique through spatial practice in a Hungarian ecological community. Socio.hu, 6, Special issue in English 4, 116−134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, J. (2017). ‘Very little heroes’: History and roots of the eco-village movement. Acta Ethnographica Hungarica, 62(1), 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, J. (2018). Nature faith and native faith as integrative spiritualities in Hungarian ecovillages. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture, 12(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, J. (2019). “The body has no soul, the soul has a body”: The concept of soul and nature in the Hungarian Krishna Valley ecovillage. In É. Pócs (Ed.), Body, soul, spirits and supernatural communication (pp. 34–53). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (2001). Going ‘back-to-the-land’ again: Extending the scope of counterurbanisation. Espace, Populations, Societes, 19(1–2), 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (2003a). A place for ‘nature’? New radicalism’s rural contribution. In Rural Geography Research Group/Commission de Ge´ographie Rurale (Eds.), Innovations in rural areas, CERAMAC 22 (pp. 51–65). Clermont-Ferrand: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (2003b). Landscapes of rurality: Rural others=other rurals. In I. Roberston & P. Richards (Eds.), Studying cultural landscapes (pp. 141–169). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (2006). From dropping out to leading on? British counter-cultural back-to-the-land in a changing rurality. Progress in Human Geography, 3, 309–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (2007). Trial by space for a ‘radical rural’: Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horlings, L. G. (2015). Values in place: A value-oriented approach toward sustainable place-shaping. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 257–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1014062.

  • Ivakhiv, A. (2005). Nature and ethnicity in East European Paganism: An environmental ethic of the religious right? Pomegranate: The International Journal of Pagan Studies, 8(2), 194−225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, H., & Svensson, K. (Eds.). (2002). Ecovillage living: Restoring the earth and her people. Cambridge: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (1988). Concepts of nature in the Hebrew Bible. Environmental Ethics, 10(4), 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litfin, K. (2005). Gaia theory: Intimations for global environmental politics. In P. Dauvergne (Ed.), Handbook of environmental politics (pp. 500–518). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. N. (1994). The historical roots of our ecological crisis: A reassessment. Fides et Historia, 26, 38–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A new look at life on earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzella, J. C. (2010). Common purse, uncommon future: The long, strange trip of communes and other intentional communities. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijering, L. (2006). Making a place of their own: Rural intentional communities in Northwest Europe. Dissertation, Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society; Groningen: Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen. http://dissertations.ub.rug.nl/faculties/rw/2006/l.meijering/?pLanguage=en&pFullItemRecord=ON. Accessed 3 July 2017.

  • Miller, T. (1998). The quest for Utopia in twentieth-century America: Volume I: 1900–1960. Syracuse and New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagybán, P. E. (2017). Élő hit − élő falu? A közös vallás hatása egy ökologikus helyi közösség összetartó erejére [Living faith—Living village? The effect of common religion on social? Cohesion in a local ecological community]. Thesis, ELTE TáTK, Humánökológia szak, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1994). Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenker, B. (1986). Intentional Communities: Ideology and alienation’ in communal societies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S., & Filip, M. (2013). Selected words for modern pagan and native faith movements in Central and Eastern Europe. In K. Aitamurto, & S. Simpson (Eds.), Modern pagan and native faith movements in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 27–43). Durham: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (1990). Postmodern geographies: The reassertation of space in critical social theory. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. (Ed.). (1995). Ecological resistance movements. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. (2010a). Dark green religion: Preface. In B. Taylor, Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future (pp. ix–xii). Berkeley: University of California Press. http://www.brontaylor.com/environmental_books/dgr/preface.html#continued. Accessed 14 July 2017.

  • Taylor, B. (2010b). Introducing religion and dark green religion. In B. Taylor (Ed.), Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future (pp. 1–12). Berkeley: University of California Press. http://www.ucpress.edu/content/chapters/9957.ch01.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2017.

  • Taylor, N. (2000). Ecovillages: Dream and reality. In H. Barton (Ed.), Sustainable communities: The potential of eco-neighbourhoods (pp. 19–28). London: Earthscan Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, J. A. (2013). The ‘lacking’ narrative: Why intentional community members choose to live a more demanding lifestyle. Lecture, Ethnography Conference, Chicago. https://www.academia.edu/6590849/The_Lacking_Narrative_Why_Intentional_Community_Members_Choose_To_Live_A_More_Demanding_Lifestyle. Accessed 28 Jan 2020.

  • Van Schyndel Kasper, D. (2008). Redefining community in the ecovillage. Human Ecology Review, 15(1), 12−24.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155, 1203–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Other Online Sources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judit Farkas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Farkas, J. (2021). Religion and Spirituality in Hungarian Eco-Villages. In: Silvern, S.E., Davis, E.H. (eds) Religion, Sustainability, and Place. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7646-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7646-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7645-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7646-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics