Abstract
At times it can be overwhelming for the beginner to learn how to confidently interpret Rasch results. This chapter presents (1) the basics of Rasch theory, (2) a user-friendly overview of key indices in Rasch analysis and how to interpret those indices, (3) an overview of specific types of Rasch presentation techniques that can be used to communicate Rasch analyses for peer-reviewed papers, and (4) a discussion of the common aspects of Rasch that can be hard for the beginner to grasp. Upon reading this chapter—the new Rasch learner will have a solid foundation which will enable a basic Rasch analysis to be carried out. Also, the new Rasch learner will be able to confidently read articles which have made use of Rasch analysis techniques.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boone, W., Staver, J., & Yale, M. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Dordrect, Netherlands: Springer.
Boone, W., & Staver, J. (forthcoming). Advances in rasch analysis in the human sciences. Dordrect, Netherlands: Springer.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Li, C. Y., Romero, S., Bonilha, H. S., Simpson, K. N., Simpson, A. N., Hong, I., et al. (2016). Linking existing instruments to develop an activity of daily living item bank. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 41(1), 25–43.
Linacre, J. M. (2019). Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program user’s guide. Beaverton, Oregon. Winsteps.com.
Malec, J. F., Torsher, L. C., Dunn, W. F., Wiegmann, D. A., Arnold, J. J., Brown, D. A., et al. (2007). The Mayo high performance teamwork scale: Reliability and validity for evaluating key crew resource management skills. Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2(1), 4–10.
Marosszeky, N. (2013). Teaching tutorial: Building measures from raw scores—We need to use the Wright stuff! Rasch Measurement Transactions, 27(2), 1418–1421.
O’Connor, J. P., Penney, D., Alfrey, L., Phillipson, S., & Phillipson, S. (2016). The development of the stereotypical attitudes in the HPE scale. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(7), 70–87.
Plannic, M., Boone, W. J., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2019). Rasch analysis in physics education research: Why measurement matters. Physical Review Physics Education Research , 15(2), 020111-1–020111-14.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic model for some intelligence and achievement tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
Wright, B. D. (1993). Thinking with raw scores. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(2), 299–300.
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1989). Differences between scores and measures. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 3(3), 63.
Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: Mesa Press.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. (1979). Best test design. Chicago, IL: Mesa Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boone, W.J. (2020). Rasch Basics for the Novice. In: Khine, M. (eds) Rasch Measurement. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1800-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1800-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1799-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1800-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)