Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 71))

  • 561 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess and analyse the oncologic postoperative outcome of patients after robotic surgery for rectal cancer We conducted a study on patients with rectal cancer undergoing robotic surgery at the 5th Surgery Clinic of the Municipal Clinical Hospital in Cluj-Napoca between January 2010 and December 2013 and evaluated postoperative survival after 5 year follow-up. There were 10 patients, median age was 62 ± 11 years. Five anterior rectal resections, three lower rectal resections and two abdominoperineal resections were performed. Most tumors were stage III (6 cases). Of the patients included in the study, 7 patients survived and 3 patients died during the 5-year follow-up period. Survival at 5 years after robotic surgery was similar to open or laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery may be an alternative to laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer, especially with regard to the identification and preservation of nerve plexuses and dissection in a narrow pelvis with similar oncologic outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baik, S.H., Ko, Y.T., Kang, C.M., Lee, W.J., Kim, N.K., Sohn, S.K., et al.: Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg. Endosc. 22, 1601–1608 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baik, S.H.: Robotic colorectal surgery. Yonsei Med. J. 49, 891–896 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Micu, B., Micu, C., Leucuta, D.C., Crivii, C., Constantea, N.: The role and prognostic impact of lymph node ratio on stage III colorectal cancer. Clujul Med. 86(3), 245–249 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, C.N., Bae, S.U., Lee, S.G., Yang, S.H., Hyun, I.G., Jang, J.H., et al.: Clinical and oncologic outcomes of totally robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial results in a center for minimally invasive surgery. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 31(4), 843–852 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hellan, M., Ouellette, J., Lagares-Garcia, J.A., Rauh, S.M., Kennedy, H.L., Nicholson, J.D., et al.: Robotic rectal cancer resection: a retrospective multicenter analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22(7), 2151–2158 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park, S., Kim, N.K.: The role of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: overcoming technical challenges in laparoscopic surgery by advanced techniques. Korean Med. Sci. 30(7), 837–846 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Araujo, S.E., Seid, V.E., Klajner, S.: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes. World J. Gastroenterol. 20(39), 14359–14370 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feroci, F., Vannucchi, A., Bianchi, P.P., Cantafio, S., Garzi, A., Formisano, G., Scatizzi, M.: Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs robotic surgery. World J. Gastroenterol. 22(13), 3602–3610 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Crolla, R.M.P.H., Tersteeg, J.J.C., van der Schelling, G.P., Wijsman, J.H., Schreinemakers, J.M.J.: Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of clinical T4b tumours of distal sigmoid and rectum: initial results. Surg. Endosc., 16 May 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6210-4

  10. Pinar, I., Fransgaard, T., Thygesen, L.C., Gögenur, I.: Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6862-2

  11. Fransgaard, T., Pinar, I., Thygesen, L.C., Gögenur, I.: Association between robot-assisted surgery and resection quality in patients with colorectal cancer. Surg. Oncol. 27(2), 177–184 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2018.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. de Jesus, J.P., Valadão, M., de Castro Araujo, R.O., Cesar, D., Linhares, E., Iglesias, A.C.: The circumferential resection margins status: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 42(6), 808–812 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bogdan Vasile Micu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Micu, B.V. et al. (2019). Oncological Outcome After Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer. In: Vlad, S., Roman, N. (eds) 6th International Conference on Advancements of Medicine and Health Care through Technology; 17–20 October 2018, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 71. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6207-1_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6207-1_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6206-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6207-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics