Abstract
This paper studies and explores a suitable blockchain solution for the IoT platform, enabling the platform user and physical devices or the virtual devices to participate in and make data or service transaction. We research on suitable blockchain-related technologies in use; consider the advantages when using blockchain to improve IoT platform’s ability, efficiency, and security, based on the different existing blockchain consensus; benchmark the performance in the IoT scenario; and make a comprehensive discuss.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Christidis K, Devetsikiotis M. Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things [J].
Buchman E. Tendermint: Byzantine Fault Tolerance in the Age of Blockchains [D]., 2016.
Pelc A, Peleg D. Broadcasting with locally bounded Byzantine faults [M]. Elsevier North-Holland, Inc. 2005.
Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system [J]. Consulted, 2008.
Wood G. Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger (EIP-150 revision) (2017) [J]. 2017.
Cachin C, Osborne S S, Sorniotti A, et al. Blockchains and consensus protocols [J]. 2017.
Hardjono T, Smith N. Cloud-Based Commissioning of Constrained Devices using Permissioned Blockchains [C]//Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on IoT Privacy, Trust, and Security. ACM, 2016: 29–36.
Kwon J. Tendermint: Consensus without mining [J]. Draft v. 0.6, fall, 2014.
Enhancing Accountability and Trust in Distributed Ledgers.
Lin I C, Liao T C. A Survey of Blockchain Security Issues and Challenges [J]. I J Network Security, 2017, 19(5): 653–659.
Sen, Jaydip. “Security and privacy challenges in cognitive wireless sensor networks.” arXiv preprint arXiv: 1302.2253 (2013).
P. Bailis, A. Fekete, M. J. Franklin, A. Ghodsi, J. M. Hellerstein, and I. Stoica. Coordination avoidance in database systems. In VLDB, 2014.
Biryukov A, Feher D, Khovratovich D. Guru: Universal Reputation Module for Distributed Consensus Protocols [R]. University of Luxembourg, 2017.
A. Dragojevic, D. Narayanan, E. B. Nightingale, M. Renzelmann, A. Shamis, A. Badam, and M. Castro. No compromises: distributed transactions with consistency, availability and performance. In SOSP, 2015.
Hyperledger. Blockchain technologies for business. https://www.hyperledger.org.
Dinh T T A, Wang J, Chen G, et al. BLOCKBENCH: A Framework for Analyzing Private Blockchains [J]. 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yi, H., Wei, F. (2019). Research on a Suitable Blockchain for IoT Platform. In: Patnaik, S., Jain, V. (eds) Recent Developments in Intelligent Computing, Communication and Devices. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 752. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8944-2_123
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8944-2_123
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8943-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8944-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)