Skip to main content

Colorimetric and Hydrophilicity Properties of White and Naturally Colored Organic Cotton Fibers Before and After Pretreatment Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organic Cotton

Abstract

It is widely known that conventionally grown cotton fiber/fabrics/apparel has chemical residues on the cotton which may cause cancer and some other health related troubles. It is also certain that organic cotton production does not consume most synthetically compounded chemicals (fertilizers, insecticides, herbicides, growth regulators and defoliants) which are suggested for only conventional cotton production. Therefore, organic cotton production lead to much more environmentally cotton fiber production in comparison to conventional cotton fiber growing. So, in this chapter, colorimetric (CIE L*, a*, b*, C*, h°, K/S, and whiteness properties etc.) and hydrophilicity properties of studied two white (Nazilli 84 S and Aydın 110) and three naturally colored (Emirel, Akdemir, Nazilli DT-15) organic cotton fiber types was investigated before and after scouring (with NaOH), conventional bleaching (with H2O2) and the combination application of scouring and bleaching (scouring + bleaching) processes in comparison with their greige (un-treated) counterparts. Greige (un-treated) Akdemir naturally colored organic cotton fiber displayed the reddest (with the highest a* value), the yellowest (with the highest b* value) appearance, the highest chroma (the most saturated), the lowest lightness (the darkest) and the highest color strength (the strongest color yield) and therefore the strongest color shade amongst the studied greige (un-treated) naturally colored organic cotton fibers. After scouring process, all three naturally colored organic cotton fibers congruously exhibited darker [with the lower lightness (L*) values and higher color strength (K/S) values], slightly redder (slightly higher a* values) and slightly less yellow (slightly lower b* values) appearance in comparison to their greige (un-treated) counterparts. Overall, it can be concluded that solely bleaching process (without any prior scouring process) and combination sequential usage of scouring and bleaching processes (scouring then bleaching = scouring + bleaching) generally did not significantly affect the color properties of studied naturally colored organic cotton fibers leading to similar close colorimetric performance with their greige (un-treated) counterparts. So, after the bleaching process, scoured naturally colored organic cotton fibers which darkened due to the scouring process roughly turned back to their original colorimetric levels of greige (un-treated) versions. In this case, if the naturally colored organic cotton fibers are blended with the normal white and off-white organic cotton fibers or other cellulosic fibers, applied bleaching process does not cause a significant color change in the naturally colored organic cotton fibers and this indicates that they will approximately remain at the same color property levels as their greige (un-treated) counterparts. Moreover, the bleaching process following the scouring process slightly increases the hydrophilicity values of both white and naturally colored organic cotton fibers leading to more hydrophilic fibers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vreeland J, James M (1999) The revival of colored cotton. Scientific America, 280 (4), 112–119; Lee J (1996) A new spin on naturally colored cotton. Agri Res 44(4):20–21

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mohammadioun M, Gallaway M, Apodaca JK (1994) An economic analysis of organic cotton as a niche crop in texas. University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Business Research, Austin, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burnett P (1995) Cotton naturally. Text Horiz 15:36–38

    Google Scholar 

  4. Murthy MSS (2001) Never say dye: the story of coloured cotton. Resonance 6:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hua S, Yuan S, Shamsi IH, Zhao X, Zhang X, Liu Y, Wen G, Wang X, Zhang H (2009) A comparison of three isolines of cotton differing in fiber color for yield, quality, and photosynthesis. Crop Sci 49(3):983–989

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reddy N, Yang Y (2015) Innovative biofibers from renewable resources. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Parmar MS, Sharma RP (2002) Development of various colours and shades in naturally coloured cotton fabrics. Indian J Fibre Text Res 27:397–407

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimmel LB, Day MP (2001) New life for an old fiber: attributes and advantages of naturally colored cotton. Aatcc Rev 1(10)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gu H (2005) Research on the improvement of the moisture absorbency of naturally self-coloured cotton, 2005. J Text Inst JOTI 96(4):247–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sundaramurthy VT (1994) Indian Text J 126–128; Sundaramurthy VT (1949) Heritable relationships of brown lints in cotton. Agronomy J 188–191

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vreeland JM Jr (1996) Organic and naturally coloured native cotton from Peru, New Research in Organic Agriculture, 11th International Scientific IFOAM Conference, August 11–15, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  12. Parmar MS, Chakraborty M (2001) Thermal and burning behavior of naturally colored cotton. Text Res J 71(12):1099–1102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hustvedt G, Crews C (2005) The Ultraviolet protection factor of naturally-pigmented cotton. J Cotton Sci 49:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kang SY (2007) Investigation of color change and moisture regain of naturally colored cotton. Doct Philos Athens, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dutt Y, Wang XD, Zhu YG, Li1 YY (2004) Breeding for high yield and fibre quality in coloured cotton. Plant Breed 123:145–151 (2004). ISSN 0179-9541

    Google Scholar 

  16. de Morais Teixeira E, Correậ AC, Manzoli A, de Lima Leite F, de Oliveira CR, Mattoso LHC (2010) Cellulose nanofibers from white and naturally colored cotton fibers. Cellulose 17:595–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carvalho L, Farias F, Lima ve M, Rodrigues J (2014) Inheritance of different fiber colors in cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.). Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 14(4):256–260

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chaudry M (1992) Natural colors of cotton. ICAC Recorder, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dickerson D, Lane ve D. Rodrigues E (1999) Naturally coloured cotton: resistance to changes in color and durability when refurbished with selected laundry aid. California State University, Agricultural Technology Institute

    Google Scholar 

  20. Elesini US, Cuden AP, Richards AF (2002) Study of the green cotton fibres. Acta Chim Slov 49:815–833

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vreeland JM (1999) In organic cotton, from field to final product. In: Myers D, Stolton S (eds) Intermediate Technology, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Demir A, Özdoğan A, Özdil N, Gürel A (2011) Ecological materials and methods in the textile industry: atmospheric-plasma treatments of naturally colored cotton. J Appl Polym Sci 119:1410–1416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Carvalho LP, Dos Santos JW (2003) Respostas correlacionadas do algodoeiro com a selec¸a˜o para a colorac¸a˜o da fibra. Pesq Agropec Bras 38:79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiao YH, Zhang Z-S, Yin M-H, Luo M, Li X-B, Hou L, Pei Y (2007) Cotton flavonoid structural genes related to the pigmentation in brown fibers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358:73–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ryser U (1999) Cotton fiber initiation and histodifferentiation, in cotton fibers, developmental biology, quality improvement, and textile processing. Basra AS (ed) Haworth Press, Binghamton, New York, Chap. 1, pp. 21–29

    Google Scholar 

  26. Buschle G, Knight D, Knight C, Fox SV (1998) Proceedings beltwide cotton conferences, January 5–9, San Diego, California. National Cotton Council, 1:731

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vreeland JM (1999) Organic cotton: from field to final product (Myers D and Stolton S as editors). Intermediate Technology Publications, London, Guildford

    Google Scholar 

  28. Karmakar SR (1999) Application in the pre-treatment processes of textiles. Colourage Annu 75–84:121

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li YH, Hardin IR (1998) Enzymatic scouring of cotton—surfactants, agitation, and selection of enzymes. Text Chem Colorist 30(9):23–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Li YH, Hardin IR (1998) Treating cotton with cellulases and pectinases: effects on cuticle and fiber properties. Text Res J 68(9):671–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Li YH, Hardin IR (1997) Enzymatic scouring of cotton: effects on structural properties. Text Chem Colorist 29(8):71–76

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin CH, Hsieh YL (2001) Direct scouring of greige cotton fabrics with proteases. Text Res J 71(5):425–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hartzell-Lawson M, Durrant SK (2000) The efficiency of pectinase scouring with agitation to improve cotton fabric wettability. Textile Chem Color Am Dyest Repor 32(8)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Etters JN (1999) Cotton preparation with alkaline pectinase: an environmental advance. Text Chem Colorist Am Dyestuff Reporter 1(3):33–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Karmakar SR (1999) Chemical technology in the pre-treatment processes of textiles. vol 12, Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  36. Valko EI (1955) Bleaching. In: Ward K Jr (ed) Chemistry and chemical technology of cotton. Interscience Publishers, New York, pp 121, 152–156

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kang SY, Epps HH (2009) Effect of scouring and enzyme treatment on moisture regain percentage of naturally colored cottons. J Text Inst 100(7):598–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsaliki E, Kechagia U, Eleftheriadis I, Xanthopoulos F (2016) Effect of wet treatments on color fastness of naturally colored cotton. J Nat Fibers 13(4):502–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kang SY, Epps HH (2008) Effect of scouring on the color of naturally-colored cotton and the mechanism of color change. AATCC Rev 8(7):38–43, 6p

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tarakçıoğlu I (1979) Tekstil Terbiyesi ve Makinaları Cilt 1, Tekstil Terbiyesinde Temel İşlemker ve Selüloz Liflerinin Terbiyesi. Ege Üniversitesi Tekstil Fakültesi Yayınları No: 2, Ege Üniversitesi Matbaası, İzmir, Bornova

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozan Avinc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Soydan, A.S. et al. (2019). Colorimetric and Hydrophilicity Properties of White and Naturally Colored Organic Cotton Fibers Before and After Pretreatment Processes. In: Gardetti, M., Muthu, S. (eds) Organic Cotton. Textile Science and Clothing Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8782-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8782-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8781-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8782-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics