Skip to main content

Risk Assessment Among Patients Receiving Primary ADT for Prostate Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hormone Therapy and Castration Resistance of Prostate Cancer
  • 585 Accesses

Abstract

Many risk assessment tools have been developed for prostate cancer patients. The risk classifications, for example, the D’Amico classification and NCCN classification, are widely used. In addition, a nomogram to predict pathological stage and prognosis has also been developed. In this chapter, J-CAPRA score for all stage of patients treated by androgen depletion therapy is explained in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz BS, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or internal radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280:969–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf

  3. Japanese Urological Association Edit. Clinical practice guideline for prostate cancer. Tokyo: Medical Review Co., Ltd.; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Partin AW, Kattan MW, Subong EN, et al. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. JAMA. 1997;227:1445–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Naito S, Kuroiwa K, Kinukawa N, et al. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2008;180:904–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Bianco FJ Jr, Dotan ZA, Fearn PA, Kattan MW. Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(10):715–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka A, Ohori M, Paul L, Yu C, Kattan MW, Ohno Y, Tachibana M. External validation of preoperative nomograms predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43(12):1255–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeung VH, Chiu Y, SS Y, WH A, Chan SW. Are preoperative Kattan and Stephenson nomograms predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy applicable in the Chinese population? ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:506062. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/506062.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. ISBN: 978-1-4443-5896-4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kimura T, Onozawa M, Miyazaki J, Kawai K, Nishiyama H, Hinotsu S, Akaza H. Validation of the prognostic grouping of the seventh edition of the tumor-nodes-metastasis classification using a large-scale prospective cohort study database of prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy. Int J Urol. 2013;20(9):880–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooperberg MR, Hinotsu S, Namiki M, Ito K, Broering J, Carroll PR, Akaza H. Risk assessment among prostate cancer patients receiving primary androgen deprivation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(26):4306–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooperberg MR, Pasta DJ, Elkin EP, et al. The University of California, San Francisco cancer of the prostate risk assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;173:1938–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kitagawa Y, Hinotsu S, Shigehara K, Nakashima K, Kawaguchi S, Yaegashi H, Mizokami A, Akaza H, Namiki M. Japan cancer of the prostate risk assessment for combined androgen blockade including bicalutamide: clinical application and validation. Int J Urol. 2013;20(7):708–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cooperberg MR, Hinotsu S, Namiki M, Carroll PR, Akaza H. Trans-Pacific variation in outcomes for men treated with primary androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2016;117(1):102–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiro Hinotsu M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hinotsu, S. (2018). Risk Assessment Among Patients Receiving Primary ADT for Prostate Cancer. In: Arai, Y., Ogawa, O. (eds) Hormone Therapy and Castration Resistance of Prostate Cancer. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7013-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7013-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7012-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7013-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics