Skip to main content

Abstract

Despite increased prosperity in sustainable construction in China, numerous issues still exist hindering its further development. The process and outcome of green project evaluation is often criticised for lacking credibility and acceptability. To overcome this necessitates stakeholder engagement and the research presented has thoroughly analysed the stakeholders of sustainable construction in China through a series of interviews. As a result, 7 relevant stakeholder groups are identified comprising (1) government organizations; (2) owners; (3) designers; (4) contractors; (5) end-users; (6) non-governmental organizations; and (7) other relevant groups (e.g. material/technology providers, etc.) with respective characteristics illustrated in details. The relative importance of each stakeholder group is then rated by adopting the mean score ranking technique. The research findings are valuable for academia/practitioners to prioritise various stakeholder groups during their participation and therefore establish an effective and efficient participatory model assessing the life-cycle sustainability of green buildings in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35(4):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan DW, Kumaraswamy MM (1996) An evaluation of construction time performance in the building industry. Build Environ 31(6):569–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JL (2005) The public participation handbook: making better decisions through citizen involvement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Enserink B, Koppenjan J (2007) Public participation in China: sustainable urbanization and governance. Manage Environ Qual Int J 18(4):459–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • IAPP (2007) IAP2 core values for public participation. International Association for Public Participation, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn RL, Cannell CF (1957) The dynamics of interviewing; theory, technique, and cases. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Li TH, Ng ST, Skitmore M (2012a) Public participation in infrastructure and construction projects in China: from an EIA-based to a whole-cycle process. Habitat Int 36(1):47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Li TH, Ng ST, Skitmore M (2012b) Conflict or consensus: an investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong. Habitat Int 36(2):333–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Li TH, Ng ST, Skitmore M (2013) Evaluating stakeholder satisfaction during public participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: a fuzzy approach. Autom Constr 29:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li TH, Thomas Ng S, Skitmore M (2015a) Modeling multi-stakeholder multi-objective decisions during public participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: a decision rule approach. J Constr Eng Manage 142(3):04015087-1–04015087-13

    Google Scholar 

  • Li TH, Ng STT, Skitmore M, Li N (2015b) Investigating stakeholder concerns during public participation. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-municipal engineer. doi:10.1680/jmuen.15.00018 (accepted and ahead of print)

  • Li HY, Zhang XL, Ng ST, Skitmore M (2017) Quantifying stakeholder influence in decision/evaluations relating to sustainable construction in China – A Delphi approach. J Cleaner Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.151

  • Loh C, Civic Exchange (2002) Getting heard: a handbook for Hong Kong citizens. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng TST, Li TH, Wong JM (2012) Rethinking public participation in infrastructure projects. Proc Inst Civ Eng Municipal Eng 165(2):101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng ST, Skitmore M, Tam KY, Li TH (2014) Public engagement in major projects: the Hong Kong experience. Proc Inst Civ Eng 167(1):22–31

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) Focus on citizens: public engagement for better policy and services. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olander S (2007) Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Constr Manage Econ 25(3):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2005) A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Values 30(2):251–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Q, Zuo J, Huang R, Huang J, Pullen S (2013) Identifying the critical factors for green construction—an empirical study in China. Habitat Int 40:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WX, Li QM, Li JH, Yuan JF, Li XG (2007) Study of satisfaction evaluation model for large-scale construction project. J Chongqing Jianzhu Univ 29(4):125–128 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71501074), the State Key Lab of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, China (Grant No. 2016ZB16) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Approval No. 2015BS11; Project No. x2tj/D215315w).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongyang Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, H., Thomas Ng, S., Dong, Y. (2018). Stakeholder Analysis of Sustainable Construction in China. In: Chau, K., Chan, I., Lu, W., Webster, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_117

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics