Abstract
Electrocardiography (ECG) and surface electromyography (SEMG) are two non-invasive tests to evaluate cardiac and muscular functionality, respectively. They are both acquired by placing electrodes on the body surface so they become one the interference of the other. Typically, linear filters are used for ECG and SEMG separation: high-pass filters with cutoff at 20 Hz to attenuate ECG interference in SEMG, and low-pass filters with cut-off at 50 Hz to attenuate SEMG interference in ECG. In spite of that, linear filtering is not adequate due to the presence of a 20-50 Hz frequency-band in which the two signal spectra overlap. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of the Segmented-Beat Modulation Method (SBMM) for ECG and SEMG separation and by accurately maintaining signals characteristics. SBMM is a template-based technique for ECG denoising: under the hypothesis of ECG and SEMG linearly superimposed, it first provides an ECG estimation, and then an SEMG estimation by subtraction. In order to test the method under several conditions, SBMM was applied to simulated as well as clinical recordings with superimposed ECG and SEMG. SBMM was able to accurately estimate both ECG and SEMG in all cases. Indeed, ECG and SEMG were estimated by maintain their features such as amplitude (estimation errors <6%), heart rate and heart-rate variability. Moreover, estimated ECG was always characterized by a spectrum mostly (76.4-100.0%) included in the 0-50 Hz frequency-band, whereas estimated SEMG was always characterized by a spectrum mostly (80.9-95.6%) included in the 20-450 Hz frequency-band. Such results confirm the existence of a 20-50 Hz frequency-band in which ECG and SEMG spectral components are overlapped. Thus, SBMM is a robust filtering procedure to separate superimposed ECG and SEMG.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
1. Christov I I, Daskalov I K (1999) Filtering of electromyogram artifacts from the electrocardiogram. Med Eng Phys 21:731-736
2. Kossmann C E, Brody D A, Burch G E (1954) Recommendations for standardization of leads and of specifications for instruments in electrocardiography and vectorcardiography. Circulation 10:564-573
3. Merletti R (1999) Standards for reporting EMG data. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 9:3-4
4. Nakagawa M, Tsunemitsu C, Katoh S et al (2014) Effect of ECG filter settings on J-waves. J Electrocardiol 47:7-11
5. García-Niebla J, Serra-Autonell G (2009) Effects of inadequate low-pass filter application. J Electrocardiol 42:303-304
6. Winter D A, Rau G, Kadefors R et al (1980) Units, terms and standards in the reporting of EMG research, Report by the Ad Hoc Committee of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology
7. Redfern M S, Hughes R E, Chaffin D B (1993) High-pass filtering to remove electrocardiographic interference from torso EMG recordings. Clin Biomech, 8:44-48
8. Drake J D M, Callaghan J P (2006) Elimination of electrocardiogram contamination from electromyogram signals: An evaluation of currently used removal techniques. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 16:175-187
9. Agostinelli A, Giuliani C, Burattini L (2014) Extracting a clean ECG from a noisy recording: a new method based on segmented-beat modulation, IEEE Proc. vol. 41, Comput. Cardiol. Conference (CinC), Cambridge, United States, 2014, pp. 49-52
10. Agostinelli A, Giuliani C, Di Nardo F et al (2015) The Segmented-Beat Modulation Method for ECG Estimation, IEEE EMBS Proc. EMBC, Milan, Italy, pp. 2856-2859 DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318987
11. Agostinelli A, Giuliani C, Di Nardo F et al (2015) Robustness of the segmented-beat modulation method to noise, IEEE Proc., Comput. Cardiol. Conference (CinC), Nice, France, 2015 DOI 10.1109/CIC.2015.7408622
12. Agostinelli A, Sbrollini A, Giuliani C et al (2016) Segmented beat modulation method for electrocardiogram estimation from noisy recordings. Med Eng Phys 38:560-568 DOI 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.03.011
13. Sbrollini A, Agostinelli A, Di Nardo F et al (2016) Evaluation of the low-frequency components in surface electromyography, IEEE EMBS Proc. EMBC, Orlando, United States, 2016, pp. 3622-3625 DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591512
14. Marque C, Bisch C, Dantas R et al (2005) Adaptive filtering for ECG rejection from surface EMG recordings. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 15 310-315
15. Burattini L, Bini S, Burattini R (2011) Automatic microvolt T-wave alternans identification in relation to ECG interferences surviving preprocessing. Med Eng Phys 33:17-30 DOI 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.08.014
16. Pan J, Tompkins W J (1985) A real-time QRS detection algorithm. IEEE T Bio Med Eng 32:230-236
17. Allison G T (2003) Trunk muscle onset detection technique for EMG signals with ECG artifact. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13:209-216
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sbrollini, A. et al. (2018). Separation of Superimposed Electrocardiographic and Electromyographic Signals. In: Eskola, H., Väisänen, O., Viik, J., Hyttinen, J. (eds) EMBEC & NBC 2017. EMBEC NBC 2017 2017. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 65. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_130
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_130
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5121-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5122-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)