Skip to main content

Governance Practices and Disclosure by Not-for-Profit Organizations: Effect on the Individual Donating Decision

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Empowering 21st Century Learners Through Holistic and Enterprising Learning

Abstract

This study aims to (1) examine how individual donating decision could be affected by demographic factors and (2) determine perception of public towards governance disclosure practiced by non-profit organizations in Malaysia. This study uses positivist approach and survey instrument to obtain data that generated subsequent statistical analyses. Using snowballing and simple random sampling, this study manages to secure a sample of 255 respondents. SPSS ANOVA, product–moment correlation and multiple regressions are used to generate results for the testable propositions. The results for Pearson moment correlation of governance practices and disclosure are statistically significant (p < 0.01). Gender is the only influencer that revealed differences between groups in respect of donating decision. The findings also showed that information disclosures about governance (β = 0.288, p < 0.001), background (β = 0.199, p < 0.003) and performance (β = 0.210, p < 0.000 with the exception of finance (β = 0.078, p > 0.001) are strong predictors of individual donating decision. The insight of this study offers senior officials and decision-makers of not-for-profits and charity organizations the essence of governance practices disclosure, revealing sufficient background and performance information for potential donors to make informed decisions. In spite of the popularity of the governance research over the years, this study is one of the novel investigations using not-for-profit organizations in relation to the proclivity for individual giving intention, the results of which could be applicable to emerging markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd, H. M. N., Nurul, A. M. I., Hamidah, M. I., Hasan, B., Arifin, M. S., & Abdul, R. R. (2015). Characteristic affecting charitable donations behaviour: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AbouAssi, K. (2015). Testing resource dependency as a motivator for NGO self-regulation suggestive evidence from the Global South. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1255–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arshad, R., Bakar, N. A., Thani, N. Y., & Omar, N. (2013). Board composition and accountability of non-profit organizations. Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(4), 1021–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., & Savani, S. (2002). Predicting the accuracy of public perceptions of charity performance. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 11(4), 326–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., & Savani, S. (2003). Predicting the accuracy of public perceptions of charity performance. Journal of Targeting Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 11, 326–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchheit, S., & Parsons, L. M. (2006). An experimental investigation of accounting information’s influence on the individual giving process. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25, 666–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, C., & Hyndman, N. (2013). Towards charity accountability: Narrowing the gap between provision and needs? Public Management Review, 15(7), 945–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deborah, L. J. (2013). Charitable giving: Baby boomers donate more, study shows. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/deborahljacobs/2013/08/08/charitable-giving-baby-boomers-donate-more-study-shows/#2c8774707d78. Accessed on June 30, 2016.

  • Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2011). Population distribution and basic demographic characteristic report 2010. www.statistics.gov.my

  • Dvorak, T., & Toubman, S. R. (2013). Are women more generous than men? Evidence from alumni donations. Eastern Economic Journal, 39, 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2000). Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In C. Plott & V. L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of results in experimental economics. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J. (2014). Charitable giving by the generations. http://nonprofit.about.com/od/fundraising/a/generationalgivingstudy.htm. Accessed on February 22, 2016.

  • Gregory, D. S., Kuo, J. S., & Ho, Y. C. (2016). The determinants of voluntary financial disclosure by nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1051–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, F., & Katz, E. (2008). Donating behaviour: If time is money, which to give? A preliminary analysis. Journal of Economic Studies, 35(4), 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haski-Leventhal, D., & Foot, C. (2016). The relationship between disclosure and household donations to nonprofit organizations in Australia. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundley, K., & Taggart, K. (2013). Above the law: America’s worst charities. The Cable News Network (CNN). http://edition.cnn.com/2013/06/13/us/worst-charities/. Accessed on May 28, 2016.

  • Hyndman, N., & McDonnell, P. (2009). Governance and charities: An exploration of key themes and the development of a research agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, 25, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, G. (2004). Informed giving: Ensuring charities inform donors. IPA Backgrounder, 16(3), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jos, V. I., & Ton, V. D. W. (2008). Charities: How important is performance to donors? International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasri, R. A. (2013). Giving behaviours in Indonesia: Motives and marketing implications for Islamic charities. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 306–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letts, C. W., Ryan, W. P., & Grossman, A. (1999). High performance nonprofit organizations: Managing upstream for greater impact. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lwin, M., Phau, I., & Lim, A. (2013). Charitable donations: Empirical evidence from Brunei. Asia Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 5(3), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, R. D. (2011). William Aramony, united way leader who was jailed for fraud, dies at 84. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/business/william-aramony-disgraced-leader-of-united-way-dies-at-84.html?_r=0. Accessed on July 4, 2016

  • Noorbijan, A. B., Roshayani, A., Normah, O., & Wan, A. A. W. M. R. (2014). Governance and financial reporting practices: Assessment of FATF and APG guidelines on Malaysia companies limited by guarantee. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 145, 254–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman, R., & Ali, N. (2014). NPO, internal controls, and supervision mechanisms in a developing country. Voluntas, 25(1), 201–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. A., & Roberts, C. R. (2012). Money matters: Does the symbolic presence of money affect charitable giving and attitudes among adolescents? Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, 13(4), 329–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, L. S., & Sharon, L. O. (2010). Charitable giving to not-for-profit organizations: Factors affecting donations to non-profit organizations. Innovative Marketing, 6(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. (2002). The resilient sector: The state of nonprofit America. In L. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 3–64). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G. D., Neely, D. G., & Guo, C. (2011). Web disclosure and the market for charitable contributions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33, 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B. B., Love, A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1997). Response to different charity appeals: The impact of donor characteristics on the amount of donations. European Journal of Marketing, 31(8), 548–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnepf, S. V., & Piper, G. (2007). Gender differences in charitable giving. Discussion paper series presented at The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), December 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, S., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). UK: West Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simaens, A., & Koster, M. (2013). Reporting on sustainable operations by third sector organizations: A signalling approach. Public Management Review, 15, 1040–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamilchelvi, S. V. C., & Ramachandran, T. (2015). The perception of donors on existing regulations and code of governance in Singapore on charities and non-profit organizations—A conceptual study. Asian Social Science, 11(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teah, M., Lwin, M., & Cheah, I. (2014). Moderating role of religious beliefs on attitudes towards charities and motivation to donate. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(5), 738–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Heijden, H. (2013). Charities in competition: Effects of accounting information on donating adjustments. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. G., Megehee, C. M., & Ogle, A. (2009). Perspectives on cross-cultural, ethnographic, brand image, storytelling, unconscious needs, and hospitality guest research. Advances in Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3(4), 215–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, K. (2015). Who gives? The determinants of charitable giving, volunteering, and their relationship. Wharton Research Scholar Journal, 5, 126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, S. J., & Linette, L. (2013). Fund-raising scams creating confusion. The Straits Times. www.straitstimes.com/singapore/fund-raising-scams-creating-confusion. Accessed on July 4, 2016.

  • Zainon, S., Atan, R., Yap, B. W., & Roland, Y. T. N. (2011). Institutional donors’ expectation of information from the non-profit organizations (NPOs) reporting: A pilot survey. International NGO Journal, 6(8), 170–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zainon, S., Atan, R., & Yap, B. W. (2014). An empirical study on the determinants of information disclosure of Malaysian non-profit organizations. Asian Review of Accounting, 22(1), 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy C. M. Yeo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yeo, A.C.M., Yun Chong, C., Carter, S. (2017). Governance Practices and Disclosure by Not-for-Profit Organizations: Effect on the Individual Donating Decision. In: Teh, G., Choy, S. (eds) Empowering 21st Century Learners Through Holistic and Enterprising Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4241-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4241-6_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4240-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4241-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics