Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cultivating Supply Chain Agility: Managerial Actions Derived from Established Antecedents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supply Chain Risk Management

Abstract

Today’s marketplace is characterized by intense competitive pressures as well as high levels of turbulence and uncertainty. Organizations require agility in their supply chains to provide superior value and also manage disruption risks and ensure uninterrupted service to customers. The cultivation of agility can be approached as a risk management initiative that enables a firm to anticipate as well as respond rapidly to marketplace changes and disruptions in the supply chain. Agility is thus of value for both risk mitigation and response. This chapter provides an updated perspective of an emerging body of literature devoted to supply chain agility. Next, based on our own research stream on this topic, we propose a set of supply chain initiatives as antecedents for cultivation of agility. These include internal integration measures, external integration with suppliers and customers, cultivation of external flexibility, and lean practices. We also provide more fundamental, cultural drivers for cultivating agility, which include market orientation, learning orientation and organizational culture types that are conducive for agility. These antecedents were established through empirical research, and we translate them into a set of managerial practices to address the cultivation of agility for both mitigation and response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2006). Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(1), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Rexhausen, D. (2013). Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1295–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunscheidel, M. J., Suresh, N. C., & Boisnier, A. D. (2010). Investigating the impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration. Human Resource Management, 49(5), 883–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, J. A., & Jehn, K. A. (1994). Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: How different can you be? Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 522–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, C., Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, C., & Suresh, N. C. (2012). An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm’s supply chain agility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(1), 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., & Towill, D. R. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., & Towill, D. R. (2002). Developing market specific supply chain strategies. International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E., Jr. (1993). Corporate culture customer orientation, and innovativeness in japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droge, C., Jayaram, J., & Vickery, S. K. (2004). The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22(6), 557–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, D. E., & Williams, F. P. (2000). Toward a taxonomy of manufacturing flexibility dimensions. Journal of Operations Management, 18(5), 577–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enz, C. A. (1988). The role of value congruity in intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 284–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fliedner, G., & Vokurka, R. J. (1997). Agility: Competitive weapon of the 1990s and beyond? Production & Inventory Management Journal, 38(3), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gligor, D. M., & Holcomb, M. C. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of supply chain agility: Establishing the link to firm performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 33(4), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gligor, D. M., Holcomb, M. C., & Stank, T. P. (2013). A multidisciplinary approach to supply chain agility: Conceptualization and scale development. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 94–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, B. T., Harris, S. G., Armenakis, A. A., & Shook, C. L. (2009). Organizational culture and effectiveness: A study of values, attitudes, and organizational outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 62(7), 673–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2012). The effect of supply chain disruptions on corporate performance. In Handbook of integrated risk management in global supply chains (pp. 51–78). Wiley handbooks in operations research and management science. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, L. W. (1998). Validating the competing values model as a representation of organizational cultures. International Journal of Organizational Analysis (1993–2002), 6(3), 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koste, L. L., & Malhotra, M. K. (1999). A theoretical framework for analyzing the dimensions of manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 18(1), 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M., & Jayaram, J. (2005). Internal and external integration for product development: The contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decision Sciences, 36(1), 97–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouvelis, P., Dong, L., Boyabatli, O., & Li, R. (2012). Integrated risk management: A conceptual framework with research overview and applications in practice. In Handbook of integrated risk management in global supply chains (pp. 3–12). Wiley handbooks in operations research and management science. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Chen, C., Goldsby, T. J., & Holsapple, C. W. (2008). A unified model of supply chain agility: The work-design perspective. International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(3), 408–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Goldsby, T. J., & Holsapple, C. W. (2009). Supply chain agility: Scale development. International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(3), 408–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Engineering the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2(1), 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R., Swink, M., & Kim, S. W. (2006). Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 440–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, B., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. (1989). Corporations, culture, and commitment: motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31(4), 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M. (2004). Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics. Journal of Operations Management, 22(5), 459–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulraj, A., & Chen, I. J. (2007). Strategic buyer-supplier relationships, information technology and external logistics integration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 43(2), 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prater, E., Biehl, M., & Smith, M. A. (2001). International supply chain agility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5/6), 823–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. B., & Caniato, F. (2003). Building a secure and resilient supply network. Supply Chain Management Review, 7(5), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, E. D., Roth, A. V., & Dean, J. W. (2003). the influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: An exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, X. (2013). Supply chain characteristics and disruption mitigation capability: An empirical investigation in China. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 16(4), 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y., & Rice, J. B. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G. C. (1989). Integrating the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management, 19(8), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2008). Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(2), 288–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 9(1), 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upton, D. M. (1995). What really makes factories flexible? Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoek, R. I. (2000). The thesis of leagility revisited. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2(3), 196–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Mieghem, J. A. (2012). Risk management and operational hedging: an overview. In Handbook of integrated risk management in global supply chains (pp. 13–49). Wiley Handbooks in operations research and management science. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, S. K., Droge, C., Setia, P., & Sambamurthy, V. (2010). Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: Complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 7025–7042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, S. K., Jayaram, J., Droge, C., & Calantone, R. (2003). The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 21(5), 523–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation (First Free Press edition, Revised and updated). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, Y. Y., Gunasekaran, A., Adeleye, E. O., & Sivayoganathan, K. (2004). Agile supply chain capabilities: Determinants of competitive objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., & Lim, J. (2003). Manufacturing flexibility: Defining and analyzing relationships among competence, capability, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Canisius College, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Michael J. Braunscheidel

  2. Department of Operations Management and Strategy, School of Management, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Nallan C. Suresh

Authors
  1. Michael J. Braunscheidel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nallan C. Suresh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Braunscheidel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Program in Business and Development Studies, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan

    Yacob Khojasteh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Braunscheidel, M.J., Suresh, N.C. (2018). Cultivating Supply Chain Agility: Managerial Actions Derived from Established Antecedents. In: Khojasteh, Y. (eds) Supply Chain Risk Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4106-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation