Abstract
Australia is currently involved in a national debate about the possibility of constitutional recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Since 2010 both of the major political parties have supported a process that leads to constitutional recognition but, beneath the surface, it remains an issue that engenders considerable political division. It is a matter of concern that no clear process for dealing with the issue has been articulated by political leaders and the future of Indigenous-settler relations after a referendum—whether the constitution is amended or not—is deeply contested. Amidst all of this uncertainty, this chapter contends that it is beneficial to seek guidance from the experiences of other societies that have attempted to formalize and institutionalize modes of conflict transformation. In particular, it discusses the processes in South Africa and Northern Ireland to evaluate the extent to which they are instructive in the decisions that face Australia. Ultimately, I argue that there are valuable lessons about the processes—albeit in different contexts—which are not being heeded by Australia’s failure to understand its process and the implications of current decisions for the future of Indigenous-settler.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aughey, A. (2005). The politics of Northern Ireland: Beyond the Belfast Agreement. London: Routledge.
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2016). Closing the gap: Australia is failing to close the gap on Indigenous disadvantage. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-10/australia-failing-to-close-the-gap-on-indigenous-disadvantage/7153234. Accessed July 13 2016.
Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). (no date). Historical lessons for a successful referendum. https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/constitutional-reform-fact-sheet-historical-lessons-successful-referendum. Accessed 13 July 2016.
Bennan, S., Gunn, B., & Williams, G. (2004). ‘Laws, J. 2000, Interview with John Howard, Prime Minister of Australia (Sydney, 29 May 2000), quoted in Bennan, S. Gunn, B. and Williams, G. 2004, “‘Sovereignty’ and its Relevance to Treaty-Making Between Indigenous Peoples and Australian Governments”, in the Sydney Law Review, Volume 26, Number 3, p. 308.
Browers, M. (2003). The reconciliation of political theory and comparative politics. In J. S. Holmes (Ed.), New approaches to comparative politics: Insights from political theory. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Calma, T. (2008). Let the Healing Begin: Response to Government to the National Apology to the Stolen Generations. Sydney: Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission, February 13.
Chalmers, M. (2016). Turnbull attacks shorten on treaty, contradicts government’s own ‘recognise’ campaign. New Matilda, https://newmatilda.com/2016/06/14/turnbull-attacks-shorten-on-treaty-contradicts-governments-own-recognise-campaign/. Accessed 13 July 2016.
Dallmayr, F. (ed.) (2010a). Introduction. In Comparative political theory: An introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–6.
Dallmayr, F. (ed.) (2010b). Beyond monologue: For a comparative political theory. In Comparative political theory: An introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 7–20.
Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC). (2016). Referendum Council Communique, 10 May 2016. https://www.dpmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/referendum-council-communique-10-may-2016.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2016.
Dixon, P. (2002). Political skills or lying and manipulation? The choreography of the Northern Ireland peace process. Political Studies, 50(4), 725–741.
Doxtader, E. (2009). With faith in the works of words: The beginnings of reconciliation in South Africa, 1985–1995. Cape Town: David Philip.
du Toit, F. (2017). A broken promise? Evaluating South Africa’s reconciliation process twenty years on. International Political Science Review (forthcoming).
Euben, R. (1997). Comparative political theory: An islamic fundamentalist critique of rationalism. The Journal of Politics, 59(1), 28–55.
Freeden, M. (2007). Editorial: The comparative study of political thinking. Journal of Political Ideologies, 12(1), 1–9.
Freeden, M., & Vincent, A. (Eds.). (2013). Comparative political thought: Theorizing practices. London: Routledge.
Glad, B., & Blanton, R. (1997). FW de Klerk and Nelson Mandela: A study in cooperative transformational leadership. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 27(3), 565–590.
Godrej, F. (2011). Cosmopolitan political thought: method, practice, discipline. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodman, T. (2009). Staging solidarity: Truth and reconciliation in a new South Africa. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Gormley-Heenan, C., Byrne, J., & Robinson, G. (2013). The Berlin walls of Change to Belfast. British Politics, 8(3), 357–382.
Hayes, B. C., & McAllister, I. (2001). Who voted for peace? Public support for the 1998 Northern Ireland agreement. Irish Political Studies, 16(1), 73–93.
Hayner, P. B. (2010). Unspeakable truths: Transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions. London: Routledge.
Jenco, L. (2007). “What does heaven ever say?” A methods-centered approach to cross-cultural engagement. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 741–755.
Jenco, L. (2016). New pasts for new futures: A temporal reading of global thought. Constellations (forthcoming).
Little, A. (2009a). Sunningdale for slow learners: Towards a complexity paradigm. In R. Taylor (Ed.), Consociational Theory. London: Routledge.
Little, A. (2009b). The Northern Ireland paradox. In A. Little & M. Lloyd (Eds.), The politics of radical democracy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Little, A. (2014). Enduring conflict: Challenging the signature of peace and democracy. New York: Bloomsbury.
Little, A. (2017). Fear, hope and disappointment: The politics of reconciliation and the dynamics of conflict transformation. International Political Science Review (forthcoming).
Little, A., & Macmillan, M. (2016). Invisibility and the politics of reconciliation in Australia: Keeping conflict in view. Ethnopolitics. doi:10.1080/17449057.2016.1219473.
Lundy, P., & McGovern, M. (2008). Truth, justice and dealing with the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland, 1998–2008. Ethnopolitics, 7(1), 177–193.
Maddison, S. (2011). Beyond white guilt. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
March, A. F. (2009). What is comparative political theory. The Review of Politics, 71, 531–565.
McEvoy, K. (2007). Beyond legalism: Towards a thicker understanding of transitional justice. Journal of Law and Society, 34(4), 411–440.
McGarry, J. (Ed.). (2001). Northern Ireland and the divided world: Post-agreement Northern Ireland in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McVeigh, R., & Rolston, B. (2007). From Good Friday to good relations: Sectarianism, racism and the Northern Ireland State. Race and Class, 48(4), 1–23.
Minow, M. (2009). Breaking the cycles of hatred: Memory, law, and repair. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Moon, C. (2008). Narrating political reconciliation: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Lanham, Md: Lexington Books.
Norval, A. J. (1998). Memory, Identity and the (im)possibility of Reconciliation: The work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa. Constellations, 5(2), 250–265.
Parel, A. J., & Keith, R. C. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative political philosophy: Studies under the upas tree. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Recognise. (2014). Once in a generation opportunity. http://www.recognise.org.au/blogs/once-in-a-generation-opportunity/. Accessed 13 July 2016.
Recognise. (no date). Strengthening relations between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. http://www.recognise.org.au/wp-content/uploads/shared/downloads/c6fcbd6e605aa813d4e1.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2016.
Schulze, K. E., & Smith, M. L. R. (2000). Decommissioning and paramilitary strategy in Northern Ireland: A problem compared. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 23(4), 77–106.
Sydney Morning Herald. (2016, June 14). Indigenous leaders push for treaty negotiations as Macolm Turnbull agrees with “invasion”. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/federal-election-2016-indigenous-leaders-push-for-treaty-negotiations-as-malcolm-turnbull-agrees-with-invasion-20160614-gpiwqg.html. Accessed July 13, 2016.
Taylor, R. (Ed.). (2009). Consociational theory: McGarry and O’Leary and the Northern Ireland conflict. London: Routledge.
The Australian. (2016, April 30). Recognise the limits of constitutional recognition. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/recognise-the-limits-of-indigenous-constitutional-recognition/news-story/75f38b448ed42b91ba66ba2e027734cc. Accessed 13 July 2016.
The Guardian. (2016, May 9). Labor’s Patrick Dodson says Indigenous treaty should be an option. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/may/09/labors-patrick-dodson-says-indigenous-treaty-should-be-an-option. Accessed 13 July 2016.
Victorian Government. (2016, March 26). Statement on self-determination. http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/statement-on-self-determination. Accessed 13 July 2016.
Wilford, R. (Ed.). (2001). Aspects of the Belfast agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, M. S., & Warren, M. E. (2013). A democratic case for comparative political theory. Political Theory, 42(1), 26–57.
Wilson, R. (2001). The politics of truth and reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the post-apartheid state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Little, A. (2016). What Is at Stake in Constitutional Recognition?. In: Maddison, S., Clark, T., de Costa, R. (eds) The Limits of Settler Colonial Reconciliation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2654-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2654-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2653-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2654-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)