Skip to main content

Children, the Great Recession and Shifting Calculi of Risk

  • Chapter
Education and the Risk Society

Part of the book series: Contexts of Education ((CONT,volume 5))

Abstract

In 1881, Frederick Winslow Taylor, a relatively obscure foreman from the Midvale Steel Works in Philadelphia, published an essay on metal cutting that rigorously analyzed the individual steps involved in fashioning metal. It marked Taylor’s first foray into an emerging engineering field where industrial processes were studied systematically in order to eliminate waste, increase worker output, and lower costs in the production process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Apple MW. Official knowledge: democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple MW. Cultural politics and education. New York: Teachers College; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner DC, Biddle BJ. The manufactured crisis: myths, fraud and the attack on america's public schools. Cambridge, MA: Perseus; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bestor, A.E. (1953). Educational wastelands: the retreat from learning in our public schools. Urbana, IL: University of Illlinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbitt. F. (1918). The curriculum. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbitt F. Curriculum making in los angeles. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan RE. Education and the cult of efficiency: a study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of the public schools. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charters WW. The reorganization of women's education. Educational Review. 1921;62:224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charters WW, Whitley IB. Analysis of secretarial duties and traits. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban L. How teachers taught: constancy and change in american classrooms, 1890–1980. New York: Longman; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubberley EP. Public school administration: a statement of the fundamental principles underlying the organization and adminstration of public education. New York: Houghton Mifflin; 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curti M. The social ideas of american educators. Paterson, NJ: Pageant; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1956). The school and society, rev. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ede A. Scripted curriculum: is it a prescription for success? Childhood Education. 2006;86(1):29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner EW. Who decides what schools teach? In: Flinders DJ, Thornton SJ, editors. The curriculum studies reader. New York: Routledge; 1997. p. 337–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham PA. Schooling america: how the public schools meet the nation's changing needs. Oxford: New York; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter R. The age of reform: from bryan to fdr. New York: Vintage; 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones MG, Jones BD, Hargrove TY. The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Lantham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karier C. Shaping the american educational state: 1900 to present. New York: Free Press; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliebard HM. The struggle for the american curriculum, 1893–1958. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut AM. Huddled masses: the immigrant and american society, 1880–1921. Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemann N. The big test: the secret history of the american meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon G. Curriculum and the work of teachers. In: Flinders DJ, Thornton SJ, editors. The curriculum studies reader. New York: Routledge; 1997. p. 188–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D. The fall of the house of labor: the workplace, the state, and american labor activism, 1865–1925. Cambridge: New York; 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moran PW. Race, law and the desegregation of public schools. New York: LFB Scholarly; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran PW. Left behind: the federal government and elementary social studies. The Researcher. 2006;20(1):26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (1995). High school students ten years after a nation at risk. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble DF. America by design: science, technology and the rise of corporate capitalism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar WF, Reynolds WM, Slattery P, Taubman PM. Understanding curriculum: an introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. 2nd ed. New York: Peter Lang; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch D. The death and life of the great american school system: how testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese WJ. America's public schools: from the common school to no child left behind. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickover HG. Education and freedom. New York: E.P. Dutton and Co.; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeter C. Equity, democracy, and neoliberal assaults on teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Equity. 2008;24(8):1947–1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedden, D. (1925). Planning curriculum research. School and Society 22: 259–265, 287–293, 319–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring J. Education and the rise of the corporate state. Boston: Beacon; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring J. The american school: 1642–2000. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor FW. Principles of scientific management. New York: Harper; 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent A. The battle at the ampersand. Democracy and Education. 2009;18(2):26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack D. The one best system: a history of american urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler RW. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe RH. The search for order, 1877–1920. New York: Hill and Wang; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters R. Race and education, 1954–2007. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilversmit A. Changing schools: progressive education theory and practice, 1930–1960. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moran, P.W. (2012). Children, the Great Recession and Shifting Calculi of Risk. In: Education and the Risk Society. Contexts of Education, vol 5. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-961-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics