Skip to main content

The Agency Problem in a Nonproprietary Theory of Union Behavior

  • Chapter
The Economics of Trade Unions

Abstract

The agency problem in unions was recognized relatively early in the modern American literature on the theory of labor organizations. Arthur Ross (1948) may have been the first to observe that union leaders, as the agents of union members, are not infrequently governed by interests at variance with their constituents. Later writers attempted to state this conflict more rigorously with varying degrees of completeness and success (Ashenfelter and Johnson, 1969; Atherton, 1973; Berkowitz, 1954; Weinstein, 1966). Although they recognized that preferences might not be identical, that information might be relatively more costly to members, and that the nature of political constraints on leaders endowed the latter with some discretionary powers, their analyses failed to adequately identify the mechanism that would permit or sustain a divergence of objectives between union management and union membership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchian, A. A. 1969. “Corporate Management and Property Rights.” In Economic Policy and the Regulation of Corporate Securities. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. A., and Demsetz, H. 1972. “Production Information Costs and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62 (December): 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, E. K. 1954. “Financial Analysis of the Local Union.” Industrial Relations 14, no. 2 (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O., and Johnson, G. 1969. “Bargaining Theory, Trade Unions and Industrial Strike Activity.” American Economic Review 59 (March): 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, W. 1973. Theory of Union Bargaining Goals. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. H. 1980. “Meany Farewell, Bid to Auto Workers, Teamsters Mark AFL-CIO. Convention.” Monthly Labor Review. Vol 103. No. 2. ( February ). Pp. 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfer, N. 1954. “Trade Union Investment Policies.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 6, no. 3 (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. 1954. “The Economics of Trade Union Organization and Administration.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 7 (July): 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R., and Goldberg, S. 1977. “Officer Performance and Compensation in Local Building Trade Unions.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 30, no. 3 (January):188–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estey, M. 1967. The Unions: Structure, Development, and Management. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estey, M., Taft, P., and Wagner, M. 1964. Regulating Union Government. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, G. S., and Pauly, M. V. 1976. “Group Health Insurance as a Local Public Good.” In The Role of Health Insurance in the Health Services Sector, ed. R. Rosett. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. 1964. The Role of Employee Benefit Structures in Manufacturing Industry. Oregon: University of Oregon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., and Meckling, W. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, R. A. 1967. “Benefits as a Preferred Form of Compensation.” Southern Economic Journal 33 (April): 492–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. L. 1980. An Ownership Theory of the Trade Union. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, A. I. 1956. “Fringe Benefits Today and Tomorrow.” Labor Law Journal, pp. 325–328, 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Industrial Conference Board. 1965. Handbook of Union Government Structure and Procedures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pencavel, J. 1971. “The Demand for Union Services: An Exercise.” Industrial Labor Relations Review, pp. 180–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, S. 1928. A Theory of the Labor Movement. Reissued New York: Kelley, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, M. 1960. “Job Scarcity and the Nature of Union Power.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 13 (April): 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R 1966. “Skill, Earnings and the Growth of Wage Supplements.” American Economic Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. 1948. Trade Union Wage Policy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayles, L., and Strauss, G. 1967. The Local Union. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senate Select Committee on Improper Practices in the Labor Management Field. 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, P. 1956. The Structure and Government of Labor Unions. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, P. 1966. “Racketeering and Labor: An Economic Analysis.” Industrial and Labor Review 14 (April): 402–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, D.L. (1984). The Agency Problem in a Nonproprietary Theory of Union Behavior. In: Rosa, JJ. (eds) The Economics of Trade Unions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1371-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1371-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-1373-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1371-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics