Abstract
While there are several definitions of sustainability, its premise is recognition of the exhaustible nature of environmental quality and recognition that the lack of well-defined property rights on environmental quality creates incentives for its overexploitation. The flow of polluting residues, which inevitably accompany production processes, could be larger than the assimilative capacity of the environment and, thus, could hinder the attainment of sustainability. Pollution is an externality associated with human activities that, in the absence of government regulation or well-defined property rights on environmental quality, individuals have no incentive to control. This implies that there is a role for environmental policy, which creates incentives to control pollution and induces a shift toward production processes that reduce the generation of polluting residuals. For sustainable development to be consistent with the growing demand for food and manufactured goods, it needs to be accompanied by technological development that increases input productivity while it reduces the generation of pollution perunit of input or per-unit of output. Numerous technologies with these features have been developed in the past, but their adoption has been limited because of a lack of incentives. In the future, government may play an important role for inducing the adoption of efficient technologies and for developing improved technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abler, D.G. and J.S. Shortle. 1999. Handbook of Environmental Economics.London, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.
Ayres, R.U. and A.V. Kneese. 1969. “Production, Consumption and Externalities.” American Economic Review 59(3): 282–297.
Babcock, B.A., P.G. Lakshminarayan, J. Wu, and D. Zilberman. 1997. “Targeting Tools for the Purchase of Environmental Amenities.” Land Economics 73(3): 325–339.
Batie, S.S. 1989. “Sustainable Development: Challenges to the Profession of Agricultural Economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(5): 1083–1101.
Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates. 1974. The Theory of Environmental Policy.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Binswanger, H.P. and V.W. Ruttan. 1978. Inducted Innovations: Technology, Institution, and Development.Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bogen, K. 1985. “Uncertainty in Environmental Health Risk Assessment: A Framework for Analysis and Application to a Risk Assessment Involving Chronic Carcinogen Exposure.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Carlson, G.A. and M.E. Wetzstein. 1993. “Pesticides and Pest Management,” in G.A. Carlson and D. Zilberman, eds., Agricultural and Environmental Resource Economics.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Caswell, M. 1991. “Irrigation Technology Adoption Decisions: Empirical Evidence,” in A. Dinar and D. Zilberman, eds., The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture.Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Caswell, M., E. Lichtenberg, and D. Zilberman. 1990. “The Effects of Pricing Policies on Water Conservation and Drainage.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72: 883–890.
Caswell, M. and D. Zilberman. 1986. “The Effects of Well Depth and Land Quality on the Choice of Irrigation Technology.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68: 798–811.
Coase, R.H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.
Dinar, A. and D. Zilberman. 1991. “Effects of Input Quality and Environmental Conditions on the Selection of Irrigation Technologies,” in A. Dinar and D. Zilberman, eds., The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture.Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Feder, G., R.E. Just, and D. Zilberman. 1985. “Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 30: 59–76.
Griliches, Z. 1957. “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change.” Econometrica 25: 501–522.
Groves, T. 1973. “Incentives in Teams.” Econome trica 41: 617–631.
Hayami, Y. and V.M. Ruttan. 1985. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective.Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Khanna, M. and D. Zilberman. 1997. “Incentives, Precision Technology and Environmental Quality.” Ecological Economics 23(1): 25–43.
Lancaster, K.L. 1968. Consumer Demand: A New Approach.New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Lichtenberg, E. and D. Zilberman. 1988. “Efficient Regulation of Environmental Health Risks.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 103: 167–178.
Linder, S. and M. McBride. 1984. “Enforcement Costs and Regulatory Reform: The Agency and Firm Response.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11: 327–346.
Malik, A. 1993. “Self-reporting and the Design of Policies for Regulating Stochastic Pollution.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24: 241–257.
Marra, M. and D. Zilberman. 1993. “Agricultural Externalities,” G.A. Carlson, D. Zilberman, and J.A. Miranowski, in eds., Agricultural and Environmental Resource Economics.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Millock, K., D. Sunding, and D. Zilberman. 1997. “An Information-revealing Incentive Mechanism for Nonpoint-source Pollution.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Olmstead, J., D. Sunding, D. Parker, R. Howitt, and D. Zilberman. 1997. “Water Marketing in the 90s: Entering the Electronic Age.” Choices 3rd Quarter: 24–28.
Parker, D. and D. Zilberman. 1996. “The Use of Information Services: The Case of CIMIS.” Agribusiness 12: 209–218.
Ruttan, V. 1994. “Constraints on the Design of Sustainable Systems of Agricultural Production.” Ecological Economics 10: 209–219.
Segerson, K. 1988. “Uncertainty and Incentives for Nonpoint Pollution Control.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15: 87–98.
Weitzman, M.L. 1974. “Prices vs. Quantities.” Review of Economic Studies 41: 477–491.
Yarkin, C., D. Sunding, D. Zilberman, and J. Siebert. 1994. “Methyl Bromide Regulation … All Crops Should Not Be Treated Equally.” California Agriculture 48(3): 10–15.
Zilberman, D., C. Yarkin, and A. Heiman. 1997. “Agricultural Biotechnology: Economic and International Implications.” Paper presented at the XXIII International Conference of Agricultural Economists, Food Security, Diversification, and Resource Management: Refocusing the Role of Agriculture? Sacramento, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khanna, M., Millock, K., Zilberman, D. (1999). Sustainability, Technology and Incentives. In: Casey, F., Schmitz, A., Swinton, S., Zilberman, D. (eds) Flexible Incentives for the Adoption of Environmental Technologies in Agriculture. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4395-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4395-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5888-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4395-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive