Abstract
Detailed spatial models generated by conditional simulation provide a powerful tool for case-specific optimization of sampling designs. The entire process of sampling, estimation, and decision can be simulated on such a model by a Monte-Carlo approach. Optimization can be based on economic functions or on decision quality constraints rather than simple minimization of estimation variance. Efficient algorithms and 32-bit desktop computers make simulation feasible for routine use. A design solution based on conditional simulation will approach the true optimum only to the degree that the simulations accurately reflect the relevant real-world characteristics. The quality of a simulation depends on a number of factors including the number of conditioning data, the accuracy of the variogram model, and the use of data transformations. The method is illustrated with two examples — one based on the well-known Walker Lake model and the other on an actual case study involving remediation of contaminated soils. For practical purposes, the method appears to be accurate, precise, and robust.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alabert, F.G. (1987), Stochastic imaging of spatial distributions using hard and soft information, MSc thesis, Stanford University.
Barnes, R. (1989) “Sampling design for geologic site characterization”, in M. Armstrong (ed.), Geostatistics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 809–822.
Burgess, T., Webster, R., and McBratney, A. (1981) “Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. IV Sampling strategy”, Journal of Soil Science 32, 643–659.
Davis, M. (1987) “Production of conditional simulations via the LU triangular decomposition of the covariance matrix”, Mathematical Geology 19, 91–98.
Deutsch, G, and Journel, A. (1992, in press) GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library, Oxford University Press, New York.
Easley, D., Borgman, L., and Weber, D. (1991) “Monitoring well placement using conditional simulation of hydraulic head”, Mathematical Geology 23, 1059–1080.
Englund, E. (1992) “A variance of geostatisticians”, Mathematical Geology 22, 417–455.
Isaaks, E. and Srivastava, R. M. (1989) An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics, Oxford University Press, New York.
Journel, A. (1974), “Geostatistics for conditional simulation of ore bodies”, Economic Geology 69, 673–687.
Olea, R. (1975) Optimum Mapping Techniques Using Regionalized Variable Theory, Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence.
Rendu, J.M. (1980) “Optimization of sampling policies: a geostatistical approach”, Fourth Joint Meeting MMIJ-AIME 1980, Tokyo.
Ryti, R., Neptune, D. and Groskinsky, B. (1991) “Superfund soil cleanup”, Environmental Testing and Analysis, Jan/Feb.
Srivastava, R.M. (1987) “Minimum variance or maximum profitability?”, CIM Bulletin, 80:63–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Englund, E.J., Heravi, N. (1993). Conditional Simulation: Practical Application for Sampling Design Optimization. In: Soares, A. (eds) Geostatistics Tróia ’92. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1739-5_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1739-5_48
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-2157-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1739-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive