Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Brief Primer on Participation: Philosophy and Practice

  • Chapter
Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation

Part of the book series: Technology, Risk, and Society ((RISKGOSO,volume 10))

Abstract

In countries with the Anglo-Saxon tradition, public participation is synonymous with participatory democracy. People there associate the very concept of democracy with the activity of participating in government decision making. Although many do little more than vote, the term embraces much more. In some European countries, namely Germany, the Netherlands, and the Scandinavian countries, public participation practices evolved largely from the labor movement, in particular with regard to co-determination of corporate management. It is only recently that participation has spread to governmental activities (Guild 1979). Participation in Germany, for example, is largely realized through the institution of political parties. To be involved, even at a local level, one must first join one of the local political parties. In recent years, however, Germany as well as the several other European countries has experienced the emergence of many social movements which demand more direct democracy, in particular in decisions related to environmental quality and technological choices (Brand 1987: 31).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Umweltstandards (de Gruyter: Berlin 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., and S. Verba, The Civic Culture (Little Brown: Boston 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S., “A Ladder of Citizen Participation,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (1969), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, J. B., “Citizen Participation at Government Expense,” Public Administration Review, 39 (1979), 477–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique (Little Brown: Boston 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B., P. Lazarsfeld, and W. McPhee, Voting (University of Chicago Press: Chicago 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, K.-W., “Kontinuität und Diskontinuität in den neuen sozialen Bewegungen,” in: R. Roth und D. Rucht (eds.), Neue Soziale Bewegungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Campus: Frankfurt am Main 1987), pp. 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. R., and Überhorst, R., Creative Democracy: Systematic Conflict Resolution and Policymaking in a World of High Science and Technology (Praeger: New York 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E., “Citizen Participation Strategies,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (1968), 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkoway, B., “The Politics of Public Hearings,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, No. 4 (1981), 566–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkoway, B., and J. Van Til, “What Do We Know About Citizen Participation? A Selective Review of Research,” in: S. Langton (ed.) Citizen Participation in America (Lexington Books: Lexington 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, D.,“A Generic Design for Public Involvement Programs,” Constructive Citizen Participation, 21 (June … September 1993), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, J. L., “The Use of Values: Public Participation in the Planning Process,” in: G. A. Daneke, M. W. Garcia and J. Delli Priscoli (eds.), Public Involvement and Social Impact Assessment (Westview Press: Boulder 1983), pp. 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupps, D. S., “Emerging Problems of Citizen Participation,” Public Administration Review, 37 (1977), 478–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A., Democracy and its Critics (Yale University Press: New Haven 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A., Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City (Yale University Press: New Haven 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneke, G. A., M. W. Garcia, and J. Delli Priscoli (eds.), Public Involvement and Social Impact Assessment (Westview Press: Boulder 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C., “Public Involvement in Hazardous Waste Siting Decisions,” Polity, 19. No. 2 (1986), 296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Sario, J., and S. Langton, “Toward a Metapolicy for Social Planning,” in: J. De Sario and S. Langton (eds.), Citizen Participation in Public Decision Making (Greenwood Press: Westport 1987), pp. 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienel, P. C., “Contributing to Social Decision Methodology: Citizen Reports on Technological Projects,” in: C. Vlek and G. Cvetkovich (eds.), Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects (Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht 1989), pp. 133–151.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., “Public Opinion on the Environment in the Reagan Era,” Environment, 29, No. 6 (July/August 1987), 7–11 and 32-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, M., “Improving Community Acceptance of Hazardous Waste Facilities Through Alternative Systems for Mitigating and Managing Risk,” Hazardous Waste, 1 (1984), 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A., and H. Nowotny, Über den Umgang mit Unsicherheit. Die Entdeckung der Gestaltbarkeit von Gesellschaft (Suhrkamp: Frankfurt/Main 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M., “Karl Marx and the Concept of Political Participation,” in: G. Parry (ed.), Participation in Politics (Manchester University Press: Manchester 1972), pp. 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino, D., “Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms,” Science, Technology, … Human Values, 15, No. 2 (1990), 226–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino, D., “Environmental Risk and Democratic Process: A Critical Review,” Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 14, No. 2 (1989), 501–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaberson, William, “Coping in the Age of ‘NIMBY’,” The New York Times June 19, Section 3:1 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk, D. R., and B. Stiftle, “Making Waves: Public Participation in State Water Planning,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 17 (1981), 597–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, F. I., The American Party System and the American People (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grima, A. P., “Analyzing Public Inputs to Environmental Planning” in: G. A. Daneke, M. W. Garcia and J. Delli Priscoli (eds.), Public Involvement and Social Impact Assessment (Westview Press: Boulder 1983), pp. 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guild, Nicholas K. Technology on Trial: Public Participation in Decision Making Related to Science and Technology (Paris: OECD, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadden, S., A Citizen’s Right-to-Know: Risk Communication and Public Policy (Westview Press: Boulder 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadden, S., “Public Perception of Hazardous Waste,” Risk Analysis, 11, No. 1 (1991), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, M., “From ‘Not in My Backyard’ to ‘Not in Anybody’s Backyard!’ Grassroots Challenge to Hazardous Waste Facility Siting,” Journal of American Planning Association, 56, No. 3 (1990), 359–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D., An Inquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, edited and introduced by C.W. Hendel (Bobbs-Merill: Indianapolis 1957 [1751]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S., “The Democratic Distemper,” The Public Interest, 41 (1970), 9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. E., “Participating in Public Affairs: Theories and Issues,” in: R. Kasperson and M. Breitbart (eds.), Participation, Decentralization, and Advocacy Planning. Resource Paper 25 (Association of American Geographers: Washington, DC, 1974), pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky, S., “Citizen Participation in Scientific and Technological Decision Making,” in: Stuart Langton (ed.), Citizen Participation Perspectives. Proceedings of the National Conference on Citizen Participation, Washington, DC, Sept. 28 — Oct. 1, 1978. (Tufts University Lincoln Filene Center for Citizenship and Public Affairs: Medford 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laksmanan, J., “An Empirical Argument for Nontechnical Public Members on Advisory Committees: FDA as a Model,” Risk Issues in Health and Safety, 1 (1990), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, S.,“Citizen Participation in America: Current Reflections On State Of the Art,” in: S. Langton (ed.), Citizen Participation in America (Lexington Books: Lexington 1978), pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, S., “Evolution of a Federal Citizen Involvement Policy,” Policy Studies Review, 1 (1981), 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leminsky, G., “Bürgerbeteiligung, Mitbestimmung und Gewerkschaften — Eine vorläufige Übersicht,” in: Hans Matthöfer (ed.), Bürgerbeteiligung und Bürgerinitiativen. Argumente in der Energiediskussion. Vol. 3 (Neckar Verlag: Villingen 1977), pp. 282–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Adeline Gordon Love Canal: Science, Politics, and People (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, F. M., “Public Participation in Risk Management Decisions: The Right to Define, The Right to Know, and The Right to Act,” Risk Issues in Health and Safety, 1 (1990), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, D., “Participatory Democracy in a Federal Agency,” in: John Pierce and Harvey Doerksen (eds.), Water Politics and Public Involvement (Science Publishers: Ann Arbor 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, Daniel and David Morell, “The NIMBY Syndrome: Facility Siting and the Failure of Democratic Discourse,” in: Norman J. Vig and Micheal E. Kraft, (eds.), Environmental Policy in the 1990’ s. Toward a New Agenda (CQ Press: Washington DC, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, L. W., “Citizen Surveys as Citizen Participation,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, No. 4 (1981), 478–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S., Considerations on Representative Government (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1873).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morell, D. and Magorian, C. Siting Hazardous Waste Facilities: Local Opposition and the Myth of Preemption (Ballinger: Cambridge 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, Daniel Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding (Maximillian: New York, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D., and M. Pollak, “The Politics of Participation in the Nuclear Debate in Sweden, the Netherlands, and Austria,” Public Policy, 25, No. 3, (1977), 333–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Legislative Committee on Toxic Substances and Hazardous Wastes, Hazardous Waste Facility Siting: A National Survey (New York Legislative Committee: Albany, June 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T., and B. Wynne, “Regulating Environmental Risk: A Comparative Perspective,” in: Paul R. Kleindorfer and Howard C. Kunreuther (Eds.), Insuring and Managing Hazardous Risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and Beyond. (Springer, Berlin 1987), pp. 389–410.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V., The Mind and Society: A Teatise on General Sociology. Translated by A. Livingstone (Harcourt, Brace: New York 1934), Volumes 1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parson, T. E., The Social System (Free Press: Glencoe 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carol Participation and Democratic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C., Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies (Basic Books: New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plough, A., and S. Krimsky, “The Emergence of Risk Communication Studies: Social and Political Context,” Science, Technology, and Human Values, 12 (1987), 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagan, M., and V. Fedor-Thurman, “Public Participation: Reflections on the California Energy Policy Experience,” in: J. De Sario and S. Langton (eds.), Citizen Participation in Public Decision Making (Greenwood; Westport 1987), pp. 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., “Risk Communication in the Community: European Lessons from the Seveso Directive,” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 40, No. 9 (1989), 1301–1308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, E. A., “NAMBY PAMBY and NIMBY PIMBY: Public Issues in the Siting of Hazardous Waste Facilities,” Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 3 (1988), 114–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, N., “Citizen Participation and Democratic Theory,” in: S. Langton (ed.), Citizen Participation in America (Lexington Books: Lexington 1978), pp. 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, W., “Elitism and Citizen Participation,” in: S. Langton (ed.), Citizen Participation Perspectives. Proceedings of the National Conference on Citizen Participation, Washington, DC, Sept. 28 — Oct. 1, 1978. (Tufts University Lincoln Filene Center for Citizenship and Public Affairs: Medford 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosener, J., “Making Bureaucracy Responsive: A Study of the Impacts of Citizen Participation and Staff Recommendations on Regulatory Decision Making,” Public Administration Review, 42 (1982), 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J., The Social Contract. Translated by Maurice Cranston, (Penguin: Harmondsworth UK, 1968 [1762]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip T. V.A. and the Grass Roots (New York: Harper and Row, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K., “Scientific Method, Anti-Foundationalism, and Public Policy,” Risk Issues in Health and Safety, 1 (1990), 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., “Perception of Risk,” Science, 236, No. 4799 (1987), 280–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, “Perceived Risk: Psychological Factors and Social Implications,” in: Proceedings of the Royal Society, A376 (Royal Society: London 1981), pp. 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. C., “Public Involvement in Public Management: Adapting and Testing a Borrowed Theory,” Public Administration Review, 50 (1990), 435–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, Community Relations in Superfund: A Handbook (US EPA: Washington, DC, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valey, T. L., and J. C. Petersen, “Public Service Science Centers: The Michigan Experience,” in: J. De Sario and S. Langton (eds.), Citizen Participation in Public Decision Making (Greenwood Press: Westport 1987), pp. 39–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., and N. H. Nie, Participation in America. Political Democracy and Social Equality (Harper and Row: New York 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, N. S. J., “Mobilisierungspotential und gesellschaftliche Bedeutung der neuen sozialen Bewegungen,” in: R. Roth and D. Rucht (Eds.), Neue Soziale Bewegungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Campus, Frankfurt/Main 1987), pp. 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesendahl, E., “Neue soziale Bewegungen und moderne Demokratietheorie,” in: R. Roth und D. Rucht (eds.), Neue Soziale Bewegungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Campus, Franfurt/Main 1987), pp. 364–384.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Thomas Webler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ortwin Renn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Technology Assessment, Stuttgart, Germany

    Ortwin Renn

  2. Antioch New England Graduate School, Keene, New Hampshire, USA

    Thomas Webler

  3. National Research Center, Jülich, Germany

    Peter Wiedemann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Webler, T., Renn, O. (1995). A Brief Primer on Participation: Philosophy and Practice. In: Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P. (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3518-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0131-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation