Skip to main content

Numerical Modeling of Tsunami Generation by Submarine and Subaerial Landslides

  • Chapter
Submarine Landslides and Tsunamis

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((NAIV,volume 21))

Abstract

Recent catastrophic tsunamis at Flores Island, Indonesia (1992), Skagway, Alaska (1994), Papua New Guinea (1998), andİzmit, Turkey (1999) have significantly increased scientific interest in landslides, and slide-generated tsunamis. Theoretical investigations and laboratory modeling further indicate that purely submarine landslides are ineffective at tsunami generation compared with subaerial slides. In the present study, we undertook several numerical experiments to examine the influence of the subaerial component of slides on surface wave generation, and to compare the tsunami generation efficiency of viscous, and rigid-body slide models. We found that a rigid-body slide produces much higher tsunami waves than a viscous (liquid) slide. The maximum wave height, and energy of generated surface waves were found to depend on various slide parameters, and factors, including slide volume, density, position, and slope angle. For a rigid-body slide, the higher the initial slide above sea level, the higher the generated waves. For a viscous slide, there is an optimal slide position (elevation) which produces the largest waves. An increase in slide volume, density, and slope angle always increases the energy of the generated waves. The added volume associated with a subaerial slide entering the water is one of the reasons that subaerial slides are much more effective tsunami generators than submarine slides. The critical parameter determining the generation of surface waves is the Froude number, Fr (the ratio between slide, and wave speeds). The most efficient generation occurs near resonance when Fr = 1.0. For purely submarine slides with p 2 ≤0.2 g-cm-3, the Froude number is always less than unity, and resonance coupling of slides, and surface waves is physically impossible. For subaerial slides there is always a resonant point (in time and space) where Fr = 1.0 for which there is a significant transfer of energy from a slide into surface waves. This resonant effect is the second reason that subaerial slides are much more important for tsunami generation than submarine slides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jiang, L., and LeBlond, P.H.: 1994, Three-dimensional modeling of tsunami generation due to a submarine mudslide, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 24(3), 559–572.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Imamura, F., and Gica, E.C.: 1996, Numerical model for tsunami generation due to subaqueous landslide along a coast, Science of Tsunami Hazards 14(1), 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tappin, D. et al.: 1999, Sediment slump likely caused 1998 Papua New Guinea tsunami, EOS 80, 329, 334, 340.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heinrich, P., Piatensi, A., Okal, E., and Hébert, H.: 2000, Near-field modeling of the July 17, 1998 tsunami in Papua New Guinea, Geophys. Res. Let. 27, 3037–3040.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Altinok, Y., Alpar, B., Ersoy, S., and Yalciner, A.C.: 1999, Tsunami generation of the Kocaeli Earthquake (August 17th, 1999) in the Izmit Bay: Coastal observations, bathymetry, and seismic data, Turkish J. Marine Sciences 5(3), 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kulikov, E.A., Rabinovich, A.B., Thomson, R.E., and Bornhold, B.D.: 1996, The landslide tsunami of November 3, 1994, Skagway Harbor, Alaska, J. Geophys. Res. 101(C3), 6609–6615.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kowalik, Z.: 1997, Landslide-generated tsunami in Skagway, Alaska, Science of Tsunami Hazards 15(2), 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rabinovich, A.B., Thomson, R.E., Kulikov, E.A., Bornhold, B.D., and Fine, I.V.: 1999, The landslidegenerated tsunami of November 3, 1994 in Skagway Harbor, Alaska: A case study, Geophys. Res. Let. 26, (19), 3009–3012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. LeBlond, P.H., and Jones, A.T.: 1995, Underwater landslides ineffective at tsunami generation, Science of Tsunami Hazards 13(1), 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, D.J.: 1960, The Alaska Earthquake on July 10, 1958: Giant wave in Lituya Bay, Bull. Seism. Soc. America 50(2), 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lander, J.F.: 1996, Tsunamis Affecting Alaska, 1737–1996. Boulder, US Dep. Comm., 195 p.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raichlen, F., J.J. Lee, C. Petroff, and P. Watts, 1996: The generation of waves by a landslide: Skagway, Alaska: A case study, Proc. 25 th Coastal Eng. Conf., ASCE, Orlando, Florida, 1478–1490.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, L., and LeBlond, P.H.: 1992, The coupling of a submarine slide, and the surface waves which it generates, J. Geophys. Res. 97(C8), 12,731-12,744.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fine, I.V., Rabinovich, A.B., Kulikov, E.A., Thomson, R.E., and Bornhold, B.D.: 1998, Numerical modelling of landslide-generated tsunamis with application to the Skagway Harbor tsunami of November 3, 1994, Proc. Int. Conf. on Tsunamis, Paris, 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomson, R.E., Rabinovich, A.B., Kulikov, E.A., Fine, I.V., and Bornhold, B.D.: 2001, On numerical simulation of the landslide-generated tsunami of November 3, 1994 in Skagway Harbor, Alaska, in Tsunami Research at the End of a Critical Decade, edited by G. Hebenstreit, Kluwer, Dorderecht, 243–282.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Titov, V.V., and González, F.: 2001, Numerical study of the source of the July 1998 PNG tsunami, in Tsunami Research at the End of a Critical Decade, edited by G. Hebenstreit, Kluwer, Dorderecht, 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Imamura, F., Hashi, K., and Imteaz, Md.M.A.: 2001, Modeling for tsunamis generated by landsliding and debris flow, in Tsunami Research at the End of a Critical Decade, edited by G. Hebenstreit, Kluwer, Dorderecht, 209–228.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Assier-Rzadkiewicz, S., Heinrich, P., Sabatier, P.C., Savoye, B., and Bourillet, J.F.: 2000, Numerical modelling of landslide-generated tsunami: The 1979 Nice event, Pure Appl. Geophys. 157, 1707–1727.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heinrich, P.: 1992, Nonlinear water waves generated by submarine, and aerial landslides, J. Waterways, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Eng., ASCE, 118(3), 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heinrich, P., Mangeney, A., Guibourg, S., Roche, R., Boudon, G., and Vheminée, J.-L.: 1998, Simulation of water waves generated by a potential debris avalanche in Montserrat, Lesser Antilles, Geophys. Res. Let. 25 (19), 3697–3700.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Norem, H., J. Locat, and B. Schieldrop: 1991, An approach to the physics, and modeling of submarine flowslides, Mar. Geotechnol. 9, 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harbitz, C.B.: 1992, Model simulations of tsunamis generated by the Storegga slides, Marine Geology 105, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Imamura, F.: 1996, Review of tsunami simulation with finite difference method, in Long-Wave Runup Models, edited by H. Yeh, P. Liu, and C. Synolakis, World Scientific, Singapore, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roache, P.J., 1976: Computational Fluid Dynamics, Hermosa Publ., Albuquerque, N.M., 446 p.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mader, C.L.: 1988, Numerical Modeling of Water Waves, Univ. California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Titov, V.V., and Synolakis, C.E.: 1998, Numerical modeling of tidal wave runup, J. Waterw., Port, Coastal and Ocean Eng., ASCE, 124(3), 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wiegel, R.L.: 1955, Laboratory studies of gravity waves generated by the movement of a submerged body, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 36(5), 759–774.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Proudman, J.: 1953, Dynamic Oceanography, Methuen, and Co., London, 409 p.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pelinovsky, E., and Poplavsky, A.: 1996, Simplified model of tsunami generation by submarine landslides, Phys. Chem. Earth 21(12), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Watts, P.: 1998, Wavemaker curves for tsunamis generated by underwater landslides, J. Waterways, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Eng., ASCE, 124(3), 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Watts, P.: 2000, Tsunami features of solid block underwater landslides, J. Waterways, Port, Coastal and Ocean Eng., ASCE, 126(3), 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Watts, P., Imamura, F., and Grilli, S.: 2000, Comparing model simulations of three benchmark tsunami generation cases, Science of Tsunami Hazards 16(2), 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Andresen, A., and Bjerrum, L.: 1967, Slides in subaqueous slopes in loose sand, and silt, in Marine Geotechnique, edited by A.F. Richards, Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana, 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chaudhry, M.H., Mercer, A.G., and Cass, D.: 1983, Modeling of slide-generated waves in a reservoir, J. Hydr. Engin., ASCE, 109(11), 1505–1520.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mofjeld, H.O., González, F.I., and Newman, J.C.: 1999, Tsunami prediction in U.S. coastal regions, in Coastal Ocean Prediction, Ch. 14, Coastal, and Estuarine Studies 56 edited by C.N.K. Mooers, AGU, Washington, 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fine, I.V., Rabinovich, A.B., Thomson, R.E., Kulikov, E.A. (2003). Numerical Modeling of Tsunami Generation by Submarine and Subaerial Landslides. In: Yalçiner, A.C., Pelinovsky, E.N., Okal, E., Synolakis, C.E. (eds) Submarine Landslides and Tsunamis. NATO Science Series, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0205-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0205-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1349-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0205-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics