Skip to main content

Semantics and Pragmatics of Sentence Connectives in Natural Language

  • Chapter
Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics

Part of the book series: Texts and Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 10))

Abstract

One need be neither a diplomat nor a lady to use the word perhaps to mean ‘yes’ one time and ‘no’ another. But what is the meaning of a word like perhaps if everyone can make it mean either ‘yes’ or ‘no’ as he pleases? Can one in any sense talk about a fixed word meaning here? But if not, what is it Voltaire is telling us when he maintains that the diplomat’s uttering “yes” as well as the lady’s uttering “no” means ‘perhaps’?

When a diplomat says “yes”, he means ‘perhaps’; when he says “perhaps”, he means ‘no’; and when he says “no”, he is no diplomat.

When a lady says “no”, she means ‘perhaps’; when she says “perhaps”, she means ‘yes’; and when she says “yes”, she is no lady.

Voltaire

For helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper I am grateful to Jerry Edmond-son, Donald Freeman, Frans Plank, and David Schwarz. I also want to express my gratitude for stimulating discussions of the material involved to students of linguistics, semiotics, and philosophy of the universities of Hamburg, Montreal, Chicago, Los Angeles, Berkeley, and Stanford. The usual disclaimers apply, of course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abraham, Werner: 1975, ‘Some Semantic Properties of Some Conjunctions,’ in S. P. Corder and E. Roulet (eds.), Some Implications of Linguistic Theory for Applied Linguistics, Brussels and Paris: Aimav and Didier, 1975, pp. 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, William P.: 1963, ‘The Quest for Meanings,’ in Mind 72 (1963), pp. 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettcher, Wolfgang and Sitta, Horst: 1972, Zusammengesetzter Satz und äquivalente Strukturen (= Deutsche Grammatik III). Frankfurt a. M.: Athenäum, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Cecil H.: 1974, Wittgensteinian Linguistics, The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Yuen Ren: 1968, Language and Symbolic Systems, Cambridge: University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jonathan L.: 1971, ‘Some Remarks on Grice’s Views about the Logical Particles of Natural Language,’ in Y. Bar Hillel (ed.), Pragmatics of Natural Languages, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1971, pp. 50–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Creelman, Marjorie B.: 1966, The Experimental Investigation of Meaning — A Review of Literature, New York: Springer, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, Marcelo: 1976, ‘Conversational Relevance,’ Working paper, Colloquium on ‘Meaning and Use’, Jerusalem, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary (ed.): 1973, Rules and Meanings — The Anthropology of Everyday Knowledge, Harmondsworth/England: Penguin, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebneter, Theodor: 1973, Strukturalismus und Transformationalismus — Einführung in Schulen und Methoden, München: List, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann, Karl Otto: 1900, Die Bedeutung des Wortes — Aufsätze aus dem Grenzgebiet der Sprachpsychologie und Logik, Leipzig: Avenarius, 1900. Reprint of the 4th edition of 1925, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Donald: 1973, ‘Keats’s “To Autumn”: Poetry as Pattern and Process,’ in Language and Style XI (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald: 1978, Formal Pragmatics for Natural Language, London and New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloy, Klaus: 1975, Sprachnormen I. — Linguistische und soziologische Analysen, Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloy, Klaus and Presch, Gunter, (eds.): 1976, Sprachnormen III. Kommunikations-orientierte Linguistik — Sprachdidaktik, Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, David and Lakoff, George: 1971, ‘Conversational Postulates,’ in Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, Herbert P.: 1968, ‘The Logic of Conversation,’ Working paper. Berkeley: University of California, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, Herbert P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation,’ in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, Hannelore and Wintermantel, Margret: 1975, Zur Entwicklung von Bedeutungen — Forschungsberichte zur Sprachentwicklung II, Weinheim and Basel: Beltz, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heringer, Hans Jürgen (ed.): 1974, Der Regelbegriff in der praktischen Semantik, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörmann, Hans: 1967, Psychologie der Sprache. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer 1967. Translated into English by H. H. Stern: Psycholinguistics — An Introduction to Research and Theory. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, Horst: 1971, Überlegungen zur Texttheorie,’ in J. Ihwe (ed.), Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, Vol. 1, Frankfurt a. M.: Athenäum, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasher, Asa: 1974, ‘Mood Implicatures: A Logical Way of Doing Generative Pragmatics,’ in Theoretical Linguistics 1 (1974), pp. 6–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempson, Ruth M.: 1915, Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics, Cambridge: University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, Franz von: 1971, Sprachphilosophie, München: Fink, 1971, 2nd edition, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, Franz von: 1975, ‘Conventions of Language and Intensional Semantics,’ in Theoretical Linguistics 2 (1975), pp. 255–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Ewald: 1977, Semantik der koordinativen Verknüpfung (= studia grammatica XIV), Berlin (GDR): Akademie-Verlag, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, Adrienne and Lehrer, Keith, (eds.): 1970, Theory of Meaning, Englewood Cliffs/N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisi, Ernst: 1953, Der Wortinhalt — Seine Struktur im Deutschen und Englischen, Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer, 1953, 4th edition 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1969, Convention — A Philosophical Study, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969. Translated into German by R. Posner and D. Wenzel: Konventionen — Eine sprachphilosophische Abhandlung, Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzer, Alfred: 1970, Sprach Zerstörung und Rekonstrukton — Vorarbeiten zu einer Metatheorie der Psychoanalyse, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, John: 1968, Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, Cambridge: University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooij, Jan J. A.: 1976, A Study of Metaphor — On the Nature of Metaphorical Expressions, with Special Reference to Their Reference, Amsterdam, New York and Oxford: North-Holland, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Charles W.: 1938, Foundations of the Theory of Signs, Chicago: University Press, 1938. Translated into German by R. Posner and J. Rehbein: Grundlagen der Zeichentheorie, München: Hanser, 1972, 2nd edition, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, Arne: 1961, ‘A Study of “or”,’ in Synthese 13 (1961), 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Roland: 1972 a, Theorie des Kommentierens — Eine Grundlagenstudie zur Semantik und Pragmatik, Frankfurt a. M.: Athenäum, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Roland: 1972 b, ‘Commenting — A Diagnostic Procedure for Semantico-Pragmatic Sentence Representations,’ in Poetics 5 (1972), pp. 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Roland: 1972c, ‘Zur systematischen Mehrdeutigkeit deutscher Lexeme,’ in Linguistik und Didaktik 12 (1972), pp. 268–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presch, Gunter and Gloy, Klaus, (eds.): 1976, Sprachnormen II Theoretische Begründungen — ausserschulische Sprachnormenpraxis, Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, Joseph: 1975, Practical Reason and Norms, London: Hutchinson, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, David A. J.: 1971, A Theory of Reasons for Action, Oxford: Clarendon, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, Bernard E.: 1976, Natural and Conventional Meaning — An Examination of the Distinction, The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadock, Jerrold M.: 1974, Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts, New York: Seminar Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmerling, Susan F.: 1975, ‘Asymmetric Conjunction and Rules of Conversation,’ in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Wilhelm: 1967, Lexikalische und aktuelle Bedeutung — Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der Wortbedeutung, Berlin (GDR): Akademie-Verlag, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R.: 1969, Speech Acts — An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuren, Pieter A. M.: 1977, Zwischen Sprache und Denken — Ein Beitrag zur empirischen Begründung der Semantik. Wiesbaden: Athenaion, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Burrhus F.: 1937, ‘The Distribution of Associated Words,’ in Psychol. Rec. 1 (1937), pp. 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, Dan I.: 1971, Psycholinguistics, Glenview/Ill. and London: Scott, Foresman and Comp., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, Edward B.: 1912, Lehrbuch der Psychologie, Part 2, Leipzig: Barth, 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, Charles: 1975, Saying and Understanding — A Generative Theory of Illocutions, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulmann, Gisela: 1975, Sprache und Wahrnehmung — Verfestigen und Aufbrechen von Anschauungen durch Wörter, Frankfurt a. M. and New York: Campus Verlag, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Ralph C. S.: 1975, ‘Conversational Implicatures,’ in Simon Blackburn (ed.): Meaning, Reference and Necessity, Cambridge: University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, John: 1919, Psychology from the Standpoint of a Behaviorist, Philadelphia and London: Lippincott 1919, 2nd edition, 1924.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Deirdre: 1976, Presuppositions and Non-truth-conditional Semantics, London, New York and San Francisco: Academic Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, ed. by G. E. M. Anscombe and R. Rhees, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Posner, R. (1980). Semantics and Pragmatics of Sentence Connectives in Natural Language. In: Searle, J.R., Kiefer, F., Bierwisch, M. (eds) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Texts and Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1045-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8964-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics