Abstract
Descartes was both metaphysician and natural philosopher. He used his metaphysics (among other things) to ground portions of his physics (or natural philosophy, or science of nature). However, as should be a commonplace but is not, he did not think he could spin all of his physics out of his metaphysics a priori, and in fact he both emphasized the need for appeals to experience in his methodological remarks on philosophizing about nature and constantly appealed to experience in describing his own philosophy of nature.1 It remains unclear exactly what he took to be amenable to empirical support, and how his appeal to experience was squared with his notorious demand for absolute certainty in matters philosophical.
An earlier version of this paper was presented before a joint session at the meetings of the History of Science Society and Philosophy of Science Association in Philadelphia, October, 1982. The current version has been revised as the result of further work, still in progress. I wish to thank Owen Hannaway for helpful discussion of the earlier version of this paper, and Wilda Anderson for detailed comments and criticism of recent drafts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Thomas Aquinas, Opera Omnia (Parma, 1865; reprint: New York, 1949), p. 227a, translated by Richard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Spath, and W. Edmund Thirlkel as Commentary on Aristotle’s “Physics”(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963), p. 4. Eustace characterized the subject matter of physics as “Corpus naturale ut naturale”, rather than “ens mobile” (Pt. 3, Physica, p.4); on the definition of nature he quotes Aristotle from the Physics, II.1: “Principium & causa ut id moveatur & quiescat, in quo primo, per se, & non ex accidenti inest” (ibid., p. 26). Coimbra accorded with Aquinas on both counts, cols. 33 and 249–252.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hatfield, G. (1985). First Philosophy and Natural Philosophy in Descartes. In: Holland, A.J. (eds) Philosophy, its History and Historiography. Royal Institute of Philosophy Conferences, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5317-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5317-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7661-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5317-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive