Skip to main content

First Philosophy and Natural Philosophy in Descartes

  • Chapter
Philosophy, its History and Historiography

Part of the book series: Royal Institute of Philosophy Conferences ((RIPC,volume 3))

Abstract

Descartes was both metaphysician and natural philosopher. He used his metaphysics (among other things) to ground portions of his physics (or natural philosophy, or science of nature). However, as should be a commonplace but is not, he did not think he could spin all of his physics out of his metaphysics a priori, and in fact he both emphasized the need for appeals to experience in his methodological remarks on philosophizing about nature and constantly appealed to experience in describing his own philosophy of nature.1 It remains unclear exactly what he took to be amenable to empirical support, and how his appeal to experience was squared with his notorious demand for absolute certainty in matters philosophical.

An earlier version of this paper was presented before a joint session at the meetings of the History of Science Society and Philosophy of Science Association in Philadelphia, October, 1982. The current version has been revised as the result of further work, still in progress. I wish to thank Owen Hannaway for helpful discussion of the earlier version of this paper, and Wilda Anderson for detailed comments and criticism of recent drafts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Thomas Aquinas, Opera Omnia (Parma, 1865; reprint: New York, 1949), p. 227a, translated by Richard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Spath, and W. Edmund Thirlkel as Commentary on Aristotle’s “Physics”(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963), p. 4. Eustace characterized the subject matter of physics as “Corpus naturale ut naturale”, rather than “ens mobile” (Pt. 3, Physica, p.4); on the definition of nature he quotes Aristotle from the Physics, II.1: “Principium & causa ut id moveatur & quiescat, in quo primo, per se, & non ex accidenti inest” (ibid., p. 26). Coimbra accorded with Aquinas on both counts, cols. 33 and 249–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hatfield, G. (1985). First Philosophy and Natural Philosophy in Descartes. In: Holland, A.J. (eds) Philosophy, its History and Historiography. Royal Institute of Philosophy Conferences, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5317-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5317-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7661-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5317-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics