Abstract
Chapter six, by comparing the main findings of the two case studies analyzed in chap. 4 and 5, provides a more detailed theoretical discussion on the role of collective action in the provision of agri-environmental public goods. The institutional and policy implications of supporting and implementing collective action are discussed, also in the light of the current debate on the innovation needed to re-orient the EU Rural Development Policy towards a more effective provision of public goods in rural areas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manage 90(5):1692–1702
Black AW (2000) Extension theory and practice: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 40:493–502
Cooper T, Hart K, Baldock D (2009) The Provision of public goods through agriculture in the European Union. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London
Deuffic P, Candau J (2006) Farming and landscape management: how French farmers are coping with the ecologization of their activities. J Agric Environ Ethics 19(6):563–585
European Commission (2011) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy. Brussels, 19.10.2011 COM (2011) 625 final/2 2011/0280 (COD)
Hagedorn K (2008) Particular requirements for institutional analysis in nature-related sectors. Europ Rev Agric Econ 35(3):357–384
Kaul I, Mendoza RU (2003) Advancing the concept of public goods. In: Kaul I, Conceição P, LeGoulven K, Mendoza RU (eds) Providing Global Public Goods. UNDP, New York
Mantino F (2010) Understanding delivery mechanisms in EU rural development policies: an institutional approach. Paper presented at the 118th Seminar of the EAAE “Rural Development: governance, policy design and delivery”. Ljubljana, Slovenia August 25–27
Mantino F (2011) Developing a territorial approach for the CAP. A discussion paper, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London
Paavola J, Adger WN (2005) Institutional ecological economics. Ecol Econ 53(4):353–368
Petrick M, Gramzow A (2012) Harnessing communities, markets and the state for public goods provision: evidence from post-socialist rural Poland. World Devel 40(11):2342–2354
Poláková J, Tucker G, Hart K, Dwyer J, Rayment M (2011) Addressing biodiversity and habitat preservation through measures applied under the common agricultural policy. Report prepared for DG agriculture and rural development, Contract No. 30-CE-0388497/00-44. London: Institute for European Environmental Policy
Polman N, Poppe KJ, Schans JW van Der, Ploeg JD van der (2010) Nested markets with common pool resources in multifunctional agriculture. Rivista di Economia Agraria LXV(2):295–318
Pretty J (2003) Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302:1912–1914
Vanclay F, Lawrence G (1995) The environmental imperative: eco-social concerns for Australian agriculture. Central Queensland University Press, Rockhampton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vanni, F. (2014). Collective Action for Public Goods: Institutional and Policy Innovation. In: Agriculture and Public Goods. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7457-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7457-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7456-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7457-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)