Skip to main content

Cultural Influences in Probabilistic Thinking

  • Chapter
Probabilistic Thinking

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

Decisions concerning business, industry, employment, sports, health, weather predictions, law, risk and opinion polling are made using an understanding of probabilistic reasoning. The importance of probability in everyday life and workplace has led to calls for an increased attention to probability in the mathematics curriculum. A number of research studies from different theoretical perspectives show that students tend to have conceptions about probability which impact on their learning.

The chapter has five sections. The first section outlines the importance of probability in both formal (school) and out-of-school situations and makes a case for teaching probability. The second section considers the different interpretations of probability. Although we use informal probabilistic notions daily in making decisions, research on probability has mostly focused on the classical and frequentist approaches, research on the subjective approach is almost non-existent. Further, the common culture may influence the informal ideas of probability. Yet, there appears to be minimal literature that deals with the educational implications of the role of culture. Hence, the third section draws on mathematics education research to discuss the interaction between mathematical cognition and social settings and culture. It will be argued that probability is no different and early notions as well misconceptions need to be addressed via this lens. It would help clarify the aims, purpose and limitations of probability education.

The next section will report on the effects of culture on students’ probabilistic thinking. I will draw on examples from my work and few others who have studied cultural influences on probabilistic thinking to explain how probability is related to human culture and tied to cultural practices. The final section will consider the issues arising out of the literature and offer suggestions for meeting these challenges. Specifically, suggestions for teaching, assessment and further research will be outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbas, T. (2002). Teacher perceptions of South Asians in Birmingham schools and colleges. Oxford Review of Education, 28(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir, G., & Williams, J. (1999). Cultural influences on children’s probabilistic thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(10), 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, R., Anderson, D., Easton, H., Te Maro, P., Smith, D., & Hynds, A. (2009). Culturally response teaching of mathematics: three models from linked studies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 157–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M. (1998). Dealing with misconceptions about probability. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 54(10), 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batanero, C., Henry, M., & Parzysz, B. (2005). The nature of chance and probability. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 15–37). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benn, R., & Burton, R. (1996). Mathematics: a peek into the mind of God? Philosophy of Mathematics Education Newsletter, 9, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. (1988a). Mathematical enculturation: a cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. J. (1988b). Mathematics education in its cultural context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(2), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. J. (1994). Cultural conflicts in mathematics education. Developing a research agenda. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2009). Recency effects in primary-age children and college students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3), 259–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. (2001). Cross-cultural issues with students from the South Pacific. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 57(1), 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrosio, U. (2001). What is ethnomathematics, and how can it help children in schools? Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 308.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Abreu, G., Bishop, A. J., & Pompeu, G. (1992). Approaches to research into cultural conflicts in mathematics learning. In Proceedings of the 16th PME conference. Durham: University of New Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollard, C. (2011). Pre-service elementary teachers and the fundamentals of probability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 10(2), 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R., & Konold, C. (1992). The psychology of learning probability. In F. Sheldon & G. Sheldon (Eds.), Statistics for the twenty-first century (pp. 151–164). Washington: Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fijian Ministry of Education, Women, Culture, Science and Technology (1994). Primary mathematics prescriptions. Suva: Curriculum Development Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1991). Factors affecting probabilistic judgements in children and adolescents. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 523–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Schaeffer, R. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: a pre-K-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria: American Statistical Association. Online: http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/GAISEPreK-12_Full.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K. (1996). Gambler way: Indian gaming in mythology, history, and archaeology in North America. Boulder: Johnson Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2005). Towards “Probability Literacy” for all citizens: building blocks and instructional dilemmas. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 39–63). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Edwards, A. (2003). Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight. British Medical Journal, 327(7417), 741–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, B. (2001). Understanding probabilistic thinking: the legacy of Efraim Fischbein. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45, 15–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, G., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2005). Teaching and learning the mathematization of uncertainty: historical, cultural, social and political contexts. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 297–324). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., & Mooney, E. S. (2007). Research in probability: responding to classroom realities. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 909–955). Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kapadia, R. (2009). Chance encounters—20 years later fundamental ideas in teaching probability at school level. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3), 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C. (1991). Understanding students’ beliefs about probability. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 139–156). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning and legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: its development in social context (pp. 67–94). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. (2002). Research, reform, and equity in US mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2/3), 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecoutre, M. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in purely random situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 557–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (2006). Mathematics learning and participation as racialized forms of experience: African–American parents speak on the struggle for mathematics literacy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8, 197–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, C., Kallman, C., & Fisher, M. (1990). Task analyses of critical evaluations of quantitative arguments: first steps in critical interpretation of graphically presented data. In Proceedings of annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA (pp. 2–22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, L. (2002). Mathematics education and critical consciousness’. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 369–376). Norwich: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, N. S., Hand, V., & Taylor, E. V. (2008). Culture and mathematics: boundaries between “Cultural” and “Domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Review of Research in Education, 32, 187–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickson, M. (1992). The culture of the mathematics classroom: an unknown quantity? In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 101–114). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peard, R. (1995). The effect of social background on the development of probabilistic reasoning. In A. J. Bishop (Ed.), Regional collaboration in mathematics education (pp. 561–570). Melbourne: Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polaki, M. V. (2002). Using instruction to identify key features of lesotho elementary students’ growth in probabilistic thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 285–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. (2007). The role of culture in teaching and learning mathematics. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 435–458). Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. J. (2003). Exploring the probabilities of “Who wants to be a millionaire?”. Teaching Statistics, 25(3), 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schield, M. (2010). Assessing statistical literacy: take care. In P. Bidgood, N. Hunt, & F. Jolliffe (Eds.), Assessment methods in statistical education: an international perspective (pp. 133–152). New York: Wiley. Chapter 11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (1997). Statistical ideas of high school students: some findings from Fiji. Unpublished PhD thesis, Waikato University, Hamilton, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2009). Dealing with students’ intuitions about probability: a social constructivist perspective. R. Averill & R. Harvey (Eds.) Teaching secondary school mathematics and statistics: evidence-based. Practice (Vol. 2). Wellington: NZCER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: reflections and directions. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M., & Zawojewski, J. S. (1999). Secondary students’ performance on data and chance in the 1996 NAEP. The Mathematics Teacher, 92(8), 713–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, H. (2005). Probability in teacher education and development. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 297–324). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strutchens, M. E., & Silver, E. A. (2000). NAEP findings regarding race/ethnicity: the students, their performance, and their classrooms. In E. A. Silver & P. A. Kenney (Eds.), Results from the seventh mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 45–72). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, W. F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: an update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 652–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truran, K. M. (1994). Children’s understandings of random generators. In C. Beesey & D. Rasmussen (Eds.), Mathematics without limits. Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematical Association of Victoria (pp. 356–362). Melbourne: Mathematical Association of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vithal, R., & Skovsmose, O. (1997). The end of innocence: a critique of “Ethnomathematics”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(2), 131–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 24–38). Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: growth and goals. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wax, M. L. (1993). How culture misdirects multiculturalism. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(2), 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, C. (1998). Ethnomathematics and multicultural mathematics education. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(9), 502–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, G. M., & Jones, G. A. (2002). Probability simulation: what meaning does it have for high school students? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematic and Technology Education, 2(2), 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sashi Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sharma, S. (2014). Cultural Influences in Probabilistic Thinking. In: Chernoff, E., Sriraman, B. (eds) Probabilistic Thinking. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics