Abstract
Decisions concerning business, industry, employment, sports, health, weather predictions, law, risk and opinion polling are made using an understanding of probabilistic reasoning. The importance of probability in everyday life and workplace has led to calls for an increased attention to probability in the mathematics curriculum. A number of research studies from different theoretical perspectives show that students tend to have conceptions about probability which impact on their learning.
The chapter has five sections. The first section outlines the importance of probability in both formal (school) and out-of-school situations and makes a case for teaching probability. The second section considers the different interpretations of probability. Although we use informal probabilistic notions daily in making decisions, research on probability has mostly focused on the classical and frequentist approaches, research on the subjective approach is almost non-existent. Further, the common culture may influence the informal ideas of probability. Yet, there appears to be minimal literature that deals with the educational implications of the role of culture. Hence, the third section draws on mathematics education research to discuss the interaction between mathematical cognition and social settings and culture. It will be argued that probability is no different and early notions as well misconceptions need to be addressed via this lens. It would help clarify the aims, purpose and limitations of probability education.
The next section will report on the effects of culture on students’ probabilistic thinking. I will draw on examples from my work and few others who have studied cultural influences on probabilistic thinking to explain how probability is related to human culture and tied to cultural practices. The final section will consider the issues arising out of the literature and offer suggestions for meeting these challenges. Specifically, suggestions for teaching, assessment and further research will be outlined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbas, T. (2002). Teacher perceptions of South Asians in Birmingham schools and colleges. Oxford Review of Education, 28(4).
Amir, G., & Williams, J. (1999). Cultural influences on children’s probabilistic thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(10), 85–107.
Averill, R., Anderson, D., Easton, H., Te Maro, P., Smith, D., & Hynds, A. (2009). Culturally response teaching of mathematics: three models from linked studies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 157–186.
Barnes, M. (1998). Dealing with misconceptions about probability. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 54(10), 17–20.
Batanero, C., Henry, M., & Parzysz, B. (2005). The nature of chance and probability. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 15–37). New York: Springer.
Benn, R., & Burton, R. (1996). Mathematics: a peek into the mind of God? Philosophy of Mathematics Education Newsletter, 9, 5–9.
Bishop, A. (1988a). Mathematical enculturation: a cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Bishop, A. J. (1988b). Mathematics education in its cultural context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(2), 179–191.
Bishop, A. J. (1994). Cultural conflicts in mathematics education. Developing a research agenda. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 15–18.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2009). Recency effects in primary-age children and college students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3), 259–274.
Clark, M. (2001). Cross-cultural issues with students from the South Pacific. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 57(1), 17–20.
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.
D’Ambrosio, U. (2001). What is ethnomathematics, and how can it help children in schools? Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 308.
De Abreu, G., Bishop, A. J., & Pompeu, G. (1992). Approaches to research into cultural conflicts in mathematics learning. In Proceedings of the 16th PME conference. Durham: University of New Hampshire.
Dollard, C. (2011). Pre-service elementary teachers and the fundamentals of probability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 10(2), 27–47.
Falk, R., & Konold, C. (1992). The psychology of learning probability. In F. Sheldon & G. Sheldon (Eds.), Statistics for the twenty-first century (pp. 151–164). Washington: Mathematical Association of America.
Fijian Ministry of Education, Women, Culture, Science and Technology (1994). Primary mathematics prescriptions. Suva: Curriculum Development Unit.
Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 96–105.
Fischbein, E., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1991). Factors affecting probabilistic judgements in children and adolescents. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 523–549.
Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Schaeffer, R. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: a pre-K-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria: American Statistical Association. Online: http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/GAISEPreK-12_Full.pdf.
Gabriel, K. (1996). Gambler way: Indian gaming in mythology, history, and archaeology in North America. Boulder: Johnson Books.
Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–24.
Gal, I. (2005). Towards “Probability Literacy” for all citizens: building blocks and instructional dilemmas. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 39–63). New York: Springer.
Gigerenzer, G., & Edwards, A. (2003). Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight. British Medical Journal, 327(7417), 741–744.
Greer, B. (2001). Understanding probabilistic thinking: the legacy of Efraim Fischbein. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45, 15–53.
Greer, G., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2005). Teaching and learning the mathematization of uncertainty: historical, cultural, social and political contexts. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 297–324). New York: Springer.
Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., & Mooney, E. S. (2007). Research in probability: responding to classroom realities. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 909–955). Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kapadia, R. (2009). Chance encounters—20 years later fundamental ideas in teaching probability at school level. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3), 371–386.
Konold, C. (1991). Understanding students’ beliefs about probability. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 139–156). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning and legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: its development in social context (pp. 67–94). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lubienski, S. (2002). Research, reform, and equity in US mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2/3), 103–125.
Lecoutre, M. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in purely random situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 557–568.
Martin, D. (2006). Mathematics learning and participation as racialized forms of experience: African–American parents speak on the struggle for mathematics literacy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8, 197–229.
McKnight, C., Kallman, C., & Fisher, M. (1990). Task analyses of critical evaluations of quantitative arguments: first steps in critical interpretation of graphically presented data. In Proceedings of annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA (pp. 2–22).
Ministry of Education (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
Moreira, L. (2002). Mathematics education and critical consciousness’. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 369–376). Norwich: University of East Anglia.
Nasir, N. S., Hand, V., & Taylor, E. V. (2008). Culture and mathematics: boundaries between “Cultural” and “Domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Review of Research in Education, 32, 187–240.
Nickson, M. (1992). The culture of the mathematics classroom: an unknown quantity? In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 101–114). New York: Macmillan.
Peard, R. (1995). The effect of social background on the development of probabilistic reasoning. In A. J. Bishop (Ed.), Regional collaboration in mathematics education (pp. 561–570). Melbourne: Monash University.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Polaki, M. V. (2002). Using instruction to identify key features of lesotho elementary students’ growth in probabilistic thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 285–314.
Presmeg, N. (2007). The role of culture in teaching and learning mathematics. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 435–458). Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Quinn, R. J. (2003). Exploring the probabilities of “Who wants to be a millionaire?”. Teaching Statistics, 25(3), 81–84.
Schield, M. (2010). Assessing statistical literacy: take care. In P. Bidgood, N. Hunt, & F. Jolliffe (Eds.), Assessment methods in statistical education: an international perspective (pp. 133–152). New York: Wiley. Chapter 11.
Sharma, S. (1997). Statistical ideas of high school students: some findings from Fiji. Unpublished PhD thesis, Waikato University, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Sharma, S. (2009). Dealing with students’ intuitions about probability: a social constructivist perspective. R. Averill & R. Harvey (Eds.) Teaching secondary school mathematics and statistics: evidence-based. Practice (Vol. 2). Wellington: NZCER Press.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: reflections and directions. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). New York: Macmillan.
Shaughnessy, J. M., & Zawojewski, J. S. (1999). Secondary students’ performance on data and chance in the 1996 NAEP. The Mathematics Teacher, 92(8), 713–718.
Stohl, H. (2005). Probability in teacher education and development. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 297–324). New York: Springer.
Strutchens, M. E., & Silver, E. A. (2000). NAEP findings regarding race/ethnicity: the students, their performance, and their classrooms. In E. A. Silver & P. A. Kenney (Eds.), Results from the seventh mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 45–72). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Tate, W. F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: an update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 652–679.
Truran, K. M. (1994). Children’s understandings of random generators. In C. Beesey & D. Rasmussen (Eds.), Mathematics without limits. Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematical Association of Victoria (pp. 356–362). Melbourne: Mathematical Association of Victoria.
Vithal, R., & Skovsmose, O. (1997). The end of innocence: a critique of “Ethnomathematics”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(2), 131–157.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 24–38). Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: growth and goals. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Wax, M. L. (1993). How culture misdirects multiculturalism. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(2), 99–115.
Zaslavsky, C. (1998). Ethnomathematics and multicultural mathematics education. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(9), 502–503.
Zimmermann, G. M., & Jones, G. A. (2002). Probability simulation: what meaning does it have for high school students? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematic and Technology Education, 2(2), 221–236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharma, S. (2014). Cultural Influences in Probabilistic Thinking. In: Chernoff, E., Sriraman, B. (eds) Probabilistic Thinking. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7154-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7155-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)