Skip to main content

Retributive Justice

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
  • 37 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander L (2018) Retributive justice. In: Olsaretti S (ed) The Oxford handbook of distributive justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 177–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander L, Ferzan K (2009) Crime and culpability. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander L, Ferzan K (2018) Reflections on crime and culpability. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth A, Von Hirsch A (2005) Proportionate sentencing: exploring the principles. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman M (2008) Punishment and justification. Ethics 118(2):258–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman M (2011) Two kinds of retributivism. In: Duff RA, Green S (eds) Philosophical foundations of criminal law. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 433–457

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berman M (2013) Rehabilitating retributivism. Law Philos 32(1):83–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman M (2016) Modest retributivism. In: Ferzan K, Morse S (eds) Legal, moral, and metaphysical truths. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 34–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonin D (2008) The problem of punishment. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee K (2011) The offender’s part in the dialogue. In: Cruft R, Kramer M, Reiff M (eds) Crime, punishment, & responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 54–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso G (2020) Justice without retribution: an epistemic argument against retributive criminal punishment. Neuroethics 13(1):13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso G, Pereboom D, Shaw E (eds) (2019) Free will skepticism in law and society: challenging retributive justice. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiao V (2018) Criminal law in the age of the administrative state. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham J (1979) Varieties of retribution. Philos Q 29(116):238–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagger R (1993) Playing fair with punishment. Ethics 103:473–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagger R (2008) Punishment as fair pay. Res Publica 14(4):259–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagger R (2018) Playing fair: political obligation and the problems of punishment. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolinko D (1997) Retributivism, consequentialism, and the intrinsic goodness of punishment. Law Philos 16(5):507–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff RA (2001) Punishment, communication, and community. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff RA (2008) The incompleteness of ‘punishment as fair play’: a response to dagger. Res Publica 14(4):277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff RA (2011) Inresponse. In: Cruft R, Kramer M, Reiff M (eds) Crime, punishment, & responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 251–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff RA (2018) The realm of criminal law. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing B (2018) Recent work on punishment and criminogenic disadvantage. Law Philos 37(91):29–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin D (2018) The will to punish. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg J (1965) The expressive function of punishment. Monist 49(3):397–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnis J (1999) Retribution: punishment’s formative aim. Am J Jurisprud 44:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green S (2011) Just deserts in unjust societies: a case-specific approach. In: Duff RA, Green S (eds) Philosophical foundations of criminal law. Oxford Universty Press, New York, pp 352–376

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna N (2014) Retributivism revisited. Philos Stud 167:473–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart HLA (2008) Punishment and responsibility, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Honderich T (1984) Punishment Pelican Books, Middlesex

    Google Scholar 

  • Husak D (1992) Why punish the deserving? Noûs 26(4):447–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz L (2018) Criminal law: Political or moral? defending a complementary conception of criminal law in the age of the administrative state. Jerusalem Rev Legal Stud 17(91):111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly E (2018) The limits of blame. Harvard University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolber A (2018) Punishment and moral risk. Univ Illinois Law Rev 2:487–532. https://illinoislawrev.web.illinois.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Kolber.pdf

  • Kolber A (2019) The subjectivist critique of proportionality. In: Alexander L, Ferzan K (eds) The Palgrave handbook of applied ethics and the criminal law. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 571–595

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kolber A (2020) The time-frame challenge to retributivism. In: Tonry M (ed) Of one-eyed and Tothless Miscreants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 183–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee AYK (2017) Defending a communicative theory of punishment: the relationship between hard treatment and amends. Oxf J Leg Stud 37(1):217–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippke R (2014) Some surprising implications of negative retributivism. J Appl Philos 31(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippke R (2019) The nature of retributive justice and its demands on the state. Law Philos 38:53–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markel D (2011) What might retributive justice be? An argument for the confrontational conception of retributivism. In: White M (ed) Retributivism: essays on theory and policy. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 49–71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matravers M (2000) Justice and punishment: the rationale of Coercion. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matravers M (2011) Duff on hard treatment. In: Cruft R, Kramer M, Reiff M (eds) Crime, punishment, & responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 68–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moore M (1997) Placing blame. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore M (2016) Responses and appreciations. In: Ferzan K, Morse S (eds) Legal, moral, and metaphysical truths. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 343–427

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moraro P (2020) Review of Richard Dagger, playing fair: political obligation and the problems of punishment. Crim Law Philos 14(1):141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris H (1968) Persons and punishment. Monist 52(4):475–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J (1973) Marxism and retribution. Philos Public Aff 2(3):217–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J (2011a) Some second thoughts on retributivism. In: White M (ed) Retributivism: essays on theory and policy. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 93–106

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J (2011b) Repentance, mercy, and communicative punishment. In: Cruft R, Kramer M, Reiff M (eds) Crime, punishment, & responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 27–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roebuck G, Wood D (2011) A retributive argument against punishment. Crim Law Philos 5(1):73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler S (2000) Justice and desert in liberal theory. Calif Law Rev 88:965–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sher G (1987) Desert. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sigler M (2018) Humility, not doubt: a reply to Adam Kolber. Univ Illinois Law Rev 158–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadros V (2011) The ends of harm. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasioulas J (2003) Mercy. Proc Aristot Soc 103(1):101–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasioulas J (2006) Punishment and repentance. Philosophy 81(316):279–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasioulas J (2010) Justice and punishment. In: Skorupski J (ed) The Routledge companion to ethics. Routledge, London & New York, pp 680–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasioulas J (2011) Where is the love? The topography of mercy. In: Cruft R, Kramer M, Reiff M (eds) Crime, punishment, & responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 37–53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tonry M (ed) (2019) Of one-eyed and toothless miscreants. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunick M (1996) Is Kant a retributivist? Hist Polit Thought 17(1):60–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron J (1992) Lex Talionis. Ariz Law Rev 34:25–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Walen A (2020) Retributive justice. In Zalta E (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Fall 2020 edn. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/justice-retributive/

  • Walker N (1999) Even more varieties of retribution. Philosophy 74:595–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yankah E (2020) Punishing them all: how criminal justice should account for mass incarceration. Res Philosophica 97(2):185–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaibert L (2006) Punishment and retribution. Routledge, London & New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaibert L (2018) Rethinking punishment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ambrose Y. K. Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lee, A.Y.K. (2022). Retributive Justice. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_909-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_909-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics