Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy pp 1–7Cite as

International Legal Positivism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

  • 1635 Accesses

Introduction

Legal positivism has been the object of prolific discussions in legal theory and jurisprudence. The notion has similarly been the object extensive examination in international legal literature too. Yet, when discussed in relation to international law, the notion of legal positivism and the debates thereon have not always mirrored the contentions debated in legal theory and jurisprudence. The following sections leave aside the elements of the discussion of international legal positivism that strictly reflect the debates on legal positivism unfolding in legal theory and jurisprudence and, instead, zero in on the very specific ways in which the notion has been approached and debated in international legal thought.

In the international legal literature, legal positivism is commonly presented as a dominant school of thought and is associated with a wide series of grand claims, namely, state-centricism, voluntarism, immanent intelligibility, formalism and source-based...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Beckett J (2001) Behind relative normativity: rules and process as prerequisites of law. Eur J Int Law 12:627

    Google Scholar 

  • Besson S, Tasioulias J (2010) The philosophy of international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnee J, Toope S (2010) Legitimacy and legality in international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Corten O (2009a) Le Discours du Droit International Pedone

    Google Scholar 

  • Corten O (2009b) Méthodologie du Droit International Public (Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles)

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont J (2011a) The politics of deformalization in international law. Goettingen J Int Law 3:503

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont J (2011b) Formalism and the sources of international law: a theory of the ascertainment of legal rules. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont J (ed) (2011c) Participants in the international legal system – multiple perspectives on non-state actors in international law. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont J (2014) The idea of ‘rules’ in the sources of international law. Br Yearb Int Law 84:103

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont J (2015) The multidimensional process of interpretation: content-determination and law-ascertainment distinguished. In: Bianchi A, Peat D, Windsor M (eds) Interpretation in international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 111-129

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouannet J (1998) Emer de Vattel et l’Èmergence Doctrinale du Droit International Classique Pédone

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammerhofer J (2004) Uncertainty in the formal sources of international law: customary international law and some of its problems. Eur J Int Law 15:523

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammerhofer J (2009) Kelsen – which Kelsen? A re-application of the pure theory to international law. Leiden J Int Law 22:225

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammerhofer J (2010) Uncertainty in international law: a Kelsenian perspective. Abingdon, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammerhofer J, d’Aspremont J (2014) International legal positivism in a post-modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy D (1987) The sources of international law. Am Univ J Int Law Policy 2:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy D, When renewal repeats: thinking against the box’ 32 N Y Univ J Int Law Polit (1999–2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi M (2005) From apology to utopia: the structure of international legal argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi M (2007) La Politique du Droit International (Pedone)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil F (1991) Rules norms and decisions: on the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Orford A, Hoffmann F (eds) (2016) The Oxford handbook of the theory of international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Simma B, Paulus A (1999) The responsibility of individuals for human rights abuses in internal conflicts: a positivist view. Am J Int Law 93:302

    Google Scholar 

  • Skouteris T (2010) The notion of progress in international law discourse. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bernstorff J (2010) The public international law theory of Hans Kelsen: believing in universal law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoof GJH (1983) Rethinking the sources of international law. Kluwer Law, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Jean d’Aspremont

Authors
  1. Jean d’Aspremont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean d’Aspremont .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for International & Comparative Law, University of Baltimore School of Law, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

    Mortimer Sellers

  2. Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften, University of Salzburg, Austria, Salzburg, Austria

    Stephan Kirste

Section Editor information

  1. Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Patricia Mindus Ph.D

  2. Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Sebastian Andres Reyes Molina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

d’Aspremont, J. (2017). International Legal Positivism. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_63-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_63-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation