Abstract
This chapter explores how lay publics respond to potential disasters. It contends that the current risk perception field largely neglects the common-sense beliefs and emotions that lie at the root of public responses to risks. The chapter challenges several of the assumptions that buttress the conventional construal of the terms ‘risk’ and ‘perception’. It proposes that the current focus on how the individual mind cognitively processes predictable, calculable phenomena should be replaced by emphasis on how emotional and socio-cultural beings represent often unknowable potential catastrophes. Social representations theory is put forward as a viable theoretical framework within which this shift could be achieved. The chapter illustrates the value of a social representations approach to studying risk by presenting the findings of a cross-cultural study examining social representations of earthquakes in cities at risk of earthquakes in the US, Japan and Turkey. The chapter concludes by proposing routes by which the findings of such studies could be channelled into behavioural intervention programmes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The term ‘return period’ refers to the average intervals of time between hazard events such as fl oods or earthquakes.
References
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211
Bauer MW (2009) The evolution of public understanding of science – discourse and comparative evidence. Sci Technol Soc 14(2):221–240
Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London
Beck U (1996) Risk society and the provident state. In: Lash S, Szerszynski B, Wynne B (eds) Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. Sage, London, pp 27–43
Beck U (2006) Living in the world risk society. Econ Soc 35(3):329–345
Bernstein PL (1998) Against the gods: the remarkable story of risk. Wiley, New York
Bish A, Michie S (2010) Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review. Br J Health Psychol 15(4):797–824
Douglas M (1992) Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. Routledge, London
Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley
Duveen G (2008) Social actors and social groups: a return to heterogeneity in social psychology. J Theory Soc Behav 38(4):369–374
Epstein S (1994) Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am Psychol 49(8):709–724
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Fishbein M, Cappella JN (2006) The role of theory in developing effective health communications. J Commun 56(s1):S1–S17
Graham H (1993) When life’s a drag: women, smoking and disadvantage. HMSO, London
Hilgartner S (1990) The dominant view of popularisation: conceptual problems, political uses. Soc Stud Sci 20(3):519–539
Höijer B (2010) Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Underst Sci 19(6):717–731
Hollway W, Jefferson T (2000) Doing qualitative research differently: free association, narrative and the interview method. Sage, London
Hough S (2010) Predicting the unpredictable: the tumultuous science of earthquake prediction. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Joffe H (1996) AIDS research and prevention: a social representational approach. Br J Med Psychol 69(3):169–190
Joffe H (1999) Risk and ‘the other’. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Joffe H (2003) Risk: from perception to social representation. Br J Soc Psychol 42(1):55–73
Joffe H (2011) Public apprehension of emerging infectious diseases: are changes afoot? Public Underst Sci 20(4):446–460
Joffe H (2013) The L’Aquila quake decision and the stigma against science. Risk Manage 60(1):6–7
Joffe H, Elsey J (under review) The free associative interview technique
Joffe H, Haarhoff G (2002) Representations of far-flung illnesses: the case of Ebola in Britain. Soc Sci Med 54(6):955–969
Joffe H, Rossetto T, Bradley C, O’Connor C (submitted) Stigma in science: the case of earthquake prediction
Joffe H, Rossetto T, Solberg C, O’Connor C (in press) Social representations of earthquakes: a study of people living in three highly seismic areas. Earthquake Spectra
Judah G, Aunger R, Schmidt W-P, Michie S, Granger S, Curtis V (2009) Experimental pretesting of hand-washing interventions in a natural setting. Am J Public Health 99(S2):S405–S411
Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D (2010) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 14(2):147–174
Leiserowitz T (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery and values. Clim Chang 77(1–2):45–72
Lerner JS, Gonzalez RM, Small DA, Fischhoff B (2003) Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: a national field experiment. Psychol Sci 14(2):144–150
Moscovici S (1961/2008) Psychoanalysis: its image and its public. Polity Press, Cambridge
Moscovici S (1984) The myth of the lonely paradigm: a rejoinder. Soc Res 51(4):939–969
Moscovici S (1988) Notes towards a description of social representations. Eur J Soc Psychol 18(3):211–250
Nishikawa S (2011) Japan’s preparedness and the great earthquake and tsunami. In: Funabashi Y, Takenaka H (eds) Lessons from the disaster. The Japan Times, Tokyo, pp 17–47
Peters EM, Burraston B, Mertz CK (2004) An emotion-based model of risk perception and stigma susceptibility: cognitive appraisals of emotion, affective reactivity, worldviews, and risk perceptions in the generation of technological stigma. Risk Anal 24(5):1349–1367
Rossetto T, Joffe H, Solberg C (2011) A different view on human vulnerability to earthquakes: lessons from risk perception studies. In: Spence RJ, So E, Scawthorn C (eds) Human casualties in earthquakes: progress in modelling and mitigation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 291–304
Rubin GJ, Potts HWW, Michie S (2010) The impact of communications about swine flu (influenza A H1N1v) on public responses to the outbreak: results from 36 national telephone surveys in the UK. Health Technol Assess 14(34):183–266
Sarewitz D (2010) World view: tomorrow never knows. Nature 463:24
Scoones I, Foster P (2010) Unpacking the international response to avian influenza: actors, networks and narratives. In: Scoones I (ed) Avian influenza, science, policy and politics. Earthscan, London, pp 19–64
Sjöberg L (2007) Emotions and risk perception. Risk Manage 9(4):223–237
Slovic P (ed) (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan, London
Slovic P (ed) (2010) The feeling of risk. Earthscan, London
Slovic P, Peters E (2006) Risk perception and affect. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15(6):322–325
Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24(2):311–322
Slovic P, Peters E, Finucane ML, MacGregor DG (2005) Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychol 24(4):S35–S40
Smith N, Joffe H (2013) How the public engages with global warming: a social representations approach. Public Underst Sci 22:16–32
Smith N, Leiserowitz A (2012) The rise of global warming scepticism: exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Anal 32(6):1021–1032
Solberg C, Rossetto T, Joffe H (2010) The social psychology of seismic adjustment. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 10(8):1663–1677
Wagner W, Duveen G, Farr R, Jovchelovitch S, Lorenzi-Cioldi F, Markova I (1999) Theory and method of social representations. Asian J Soc Psychol 2(1):95–125
Washer P (2004) Representations of SARS in the British newspapers. Soc Sci Med 59(12):2561–2571
Washer P (2006) Representations of mad cow disease. Soc Sci Med 62(2):457–466
Washer P, Joffe H (2006) The “hospital superbug”: social representations of MRSA. Soc Sci Med 63(8):2141–2152
Washer P, Joffe H, Solberg C (2008) Audience readings of media messages about MRSA. J Hosp Infect 70(1):42–47
Weinstein ND (1978) Cognitive processes and information seeking concerning an environmental health threat. J Human Stress 4(1):32–41
Weinstein ND (2003) Exploring the links between risk perceptions and preventive health behavior. In: Suls J, Wallston KA (eds) Social psychological foundations of health and illness. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 22–53
World Health Organisation (2012) The Great East Japan earthquake: a story of devastating natural disaster, a tale of human compassion. WHO Press, Geneva
Yamori K (2013) A historical overview of social representation of earthquake risk in Japan: Fatalism, social reform, scientific control and collaborative risk management. In: Joffe H, Rossetto T, Adams J (eds) Cities at risk: living with perils in the twenty-first century. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 73–91
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Joffe, H., O’Connor, C. (2013). Risk Society and Representations of Risks: Earthquakes and Beyond. In: Joffe, H., Rossetto, T., Adams, J. (eds) Cities at Risk. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6184-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6184-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6183-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6184-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)