Skip to main content

Urban Resilience and Spatial Dynamics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 106))

Abstract

Cities, as complex systems, present different urban patterns and spatial dynamics with diverse and multiple characteristics. Urban systems change and reorganise according to the diverse outcomes of economic globalisation, based primarily on population data, but with secondary reference to trends in economic growth and restructuring, and to the various roles played by governments in shaping the urbanisation process (Bourne 1995). Thus, economic growth and restructuring resulting from globalisation creates certain population dynamics and mobility patterns that influence the reorganisation of urban spaces (drivers of the economic globalisation are discussed in detail in Chap. 5 for the case study areas introduced in this book). The reorganisation of urban space, which is strongly influenced by the adaptation strategies of cities to global processes and endogenous capacities, takes various forms. This chapter intends to explore these spatial forms and dynamics and their implications on the resilience of cities. It is argued in Chap. 1 that certain spatial patterns may provide capacity to the system to absorb disturbances and reorganise itself. In this chapter, in order to understand the extent of the spatial dynamics to address social and spatial challenges, both the inner city and peri-urbanised areas, first of all, these spatial dynamics are identified, and secondly, their relation to the attributes of resilience is clarified. In this respect this chapter aims to provide an umbrella conceptual framework for the relationship between spatial change and resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rurbanisation refers to the process of spatial transformation in rural areas at the immediate periphery of cities caused by economic, demographic and social transformations from rural functions towards more urban activities in previously rural areas.

References

  • Alberti, M. (2005). The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 168–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, M., Marzluff, J. M. (2004). Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: Linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosystems 7(3), 241–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrechts, L. (2001). How to proceed from image and discourse to action: As applied to the Flemish diamond. Urban Studies, 38(4), 733–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angel, S., Sheppard, S. C., & Civco, D. L. (2005). The dynamics of global urban expansion. Department of Transport and Urban Development. The World Bank. http://www.citiesalliance.org/ca/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/CA_Docs/resources/upgrading/urban-expansion/1.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2009.

  • Bae, C.-H. C., & Richardson, H. (2004). Introduction. In H. W. Richardson & C.-H. C. Bae (Eds.), Urban sprawl in western Europe and United States (pp. 1–10). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf, E., Kindler, A., & Haase, D. (2006). Monitoring and modelling indicators for urban shrinkage: The city of Leipzig, Germany. Paper in Center for Remote Sensing of Land Surfaces, Bonn. http://www.zfl.uni-bonn.de/earsel/papers/299-306_Banzhaf.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2008.

  • Batten, D. F. (1995). Network cities: Creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century. Urban Studies, 32(2), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2007). Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: Lessons from resilience thinking. Natural Hazards 41, 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borries, F., & Böttger, M. (2004). BürgerMeister: New tactics for shrinking cities. Advances in art. Urban Futures, 4, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, L. S. (1995). Urban growth and population redistribution in North America: A diverse and unequal landscape. Major report no: 32. Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, A. O. M., & Pagano, M. A. (2004). Terra incognita: Vacant land and urban strategies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachman, L. (2004). Turning brownfields into community assets: Barriers to redevelopment. In R. Greenstein & Y. Sungu-Eryilmaz (Eds.), Recycling the city: The use and reuse of urban land (pp. 67–88). Cambridge: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J. K. (2001). Urban sprawl: Lessons from urban economics. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 65–97, [online] URL http://www.jstor.org/pss/25058783

  • Burgess, R. (2000). The compact city debate: A global perspective. In M. Jenks & R. Burgess (Eds.), Compact cities: Sustainable urban forms for developing countries (pp. 114–121). London/New York: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, E. (2000). Compact city: Just or just compact? A preliminary analysis. Urban Studies, 37(11), 1969–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capello, R. (2000). The city network paradigm: Measuring urban network externalities. Urban Studies, 37(11), 1925–1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, J. I., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2003). Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(4), 503–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion, A. G. (2001). A changing demographic regime and evolving polycentric urban regions: Consequences for the size, composition and distribution of city populations. Urban Studies, 38(4), 657–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couch, C., Karecha, J., Nuissl, H., & Rink, D. (2005). Decline and sprawl: An evolving type of urban development – observed in Liverpool and Leipzig. European Planning Studies, 13(1), 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi, S. (2003). Polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11(8), 979–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Roo, G. (2000). Environmental conflicts in compact cities: Complexity, decisionmaking, and policy approaches. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(1), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delken, E. (2007). Happiness in shrinking cities in Germany: A research note. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1999). European spatial development perspective: Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the EU. Official document. The Committee on Spatial Development. http://ec.europa.eu. Accessed 2 Mar 2009.

  • Ewing, R. (1997). Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., & Elmqvist, T. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31, 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabi, S., Glanzmann, L., Kruse, C., & Thierstein, A. (2006). Governance strategies for the Zürich-Basel metropolitan region in Switzerland. Built Environment, 32(2), 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M. R., Wolman, H., Coleman, S., & Freihage, J. (2001). Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate, 12(4), 681–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2001). Decentralized employment and the transformation of the American city. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 2, 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2003). Sprawl and urban growth. In V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics cities and geography (pp. 2481–2527). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4(3.1), 136–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. (1997a). Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. (1997b). US population and employment trends and sprawl issues. In H. W. Richardson & C.-H. C. Bae (Eds.), Urban sprawl in western Europe and United States (pp. 217–236). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, N. (2007). Functional polycentricity: A formal definition in terms of social network analysis. Urban Studies, 44(11), 2077–2103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, R., & Sungu-Eryilmaz, Y. (Eds.). (2004). Recycling the city: The use and re-use of urban land. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Pain, K. (Eds.). (2006). The polycentric metropolis. Learning from mega-city region in Europe. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., & Gunderson L. H. (2002). Resilience and adaptive cycles. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 25–62). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell-Moroney, M. (2008). A description and exploration of recent state-led smart-growth efforts. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(4), 678–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ipenburg, D., & Lambregts, B. (Eds.). (2001). Polynuclear urban regions in North West Europe, a survey of key actor views. Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessen, J. (2006). Urban renewal: A look back to the future. The importance of models in renewing urban planning. German Journal of Urban Studies, 45, 1, http://www.difu.de/node/5993

  • Jones, C., & MacDonald, C. (2004, June 2–5). Sustainable urban form and real estate markets. In European Real Estate Conference, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, W., Kunzmann, K. R., & Schmitt, P. (2004). A cooperative spatial future for RheinRuhr. European Planning Studies, 12(3), 323–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, P. (2004). Traditional and new models explaining urban and regional form and change. Case Helsinki. In A. Borsdorf & P. Zembri (Ed.), European cities insights on outskirts: Structures (pp. 31–48). Cost action C10 report. http://www.qub.ac.uk/ep/research/costc10/findoc/dyn.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2009.

  • Lambregts, B. (2006). Polycentrism: Boon or barrier to metropolitan competitiveness? The case of the Randstad Holland. Built Environment, 32(2), 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leo, C., & Brown, W. (2000). Slow growth and urban development policy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(2), 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijers, E. (2005). Polycentric urban regions and the quest for synergy: Is a network of cities more than the sum of the parts? Urban Studies, 42(4), 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijers, E. (2007). Synergy in polycentric urban regions. Complementarity, organising capacity and critical mass. Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijers, E., & Romein, A. (2003). Realizing potential: Building regional organizing capacity in polycentric urban regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mela, A. (2008). The polycentric city and environmental resources. In G. Maciocco (Ed.), The territorial future of the city. Urban and landscapes perspectives (pp. 71–86). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Montenegro, M. (2010). Urban resilience. Seed Magazine. http://www.seedmagazine.com. Accessed 1 Feb 2011.

  • Oswalt, P., & Rieniets, T. (2006). Introduction. In P. Oswalt (Ed.), Atlas of shrinking cities (pp. 6–7). Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallagst, K. (2008). Shrinking cities. Planning challenges from an international perspective. In S. Rugare & T. Schwarz (Eds.), Cities growing smaller (pp. 5–16). Cleveland: Kent State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A., Burch, W. R., Jr., Dalton, S. E., Foresman, T. W., Grove, J. M., & Rowntree, R. (1997). A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1(4), 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resiliance Alliance. (2007). Urban resilience research prospectus, a resilience alliance initiative for transitioning urban systems towards sustainable futures. Australia/USA/Sweden: CSIRO/Arizona State University/Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieniets, T., Beyer, E., et al. (2006). Atlas of shrinking cities. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, P. (2005). Territorial cohesion in Europe? Planning Theory and Practice, 6(3), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoffham, E., & Vale, B. (1996). How compact is sustainable-How sustainable is compact? In M. Jenks, E. Burton, & K. Williams (Eds.), The compact city: A sustainable urban form? (pp. 66–73). London/Glasgow/Weinheim: E&FN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonne, W. (2009). Dwelling in the metropolis: Reformed urban blocks 1890–1940 as a model for the sustainable compact city. Progress in Planning, 72(2), 53–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, S. (2010). Planning for shrinking cities in Portugal. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Engineering. University of Oporto, Oporto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, S., & Pinho, P. (2009). Growth versus Shrinkage. In Proceedings of the CITTA 2nd Annual Conference on Planning Research Planning in Times of Uncertainty, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Oporto, Oporto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietjen, A. (2007). Imagineering urban identity in a shrinking Danish region. Working paper. The “Modernization and regionalism. Re-inventing urban identity” Conference. http://aarch.dk/fileadmin/grupper/institut_ii/PDF/working_paper_04_2007.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2009.

  • Torrens, P. M. (2008). A toolkit for measuring sprawl. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 1, 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turvani, M., & Tonin, S. (2008). Brownfields remediation and reuse: An opportunity for urban sustainable development. In C. Clini, I. Musu, & M. L. Gullino (Eds.), Sustainable development and environment management experiences and case studies (pp. 397–411). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiechmann, T. (2008). Strategic flexibility beyond growth and shrinkage. Lessons from Dresden, Germany. In S. Rugare & T. Schwarz (Eds.), Cities growing smaller (pp. 17–30). Cleveland: Kent State University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Santos Cruz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cruz, S.S., Costa, J.P.T.A., de Sousa, S.Á., Pinho, P. (2013). Urban Resilience and Spatial Dynamics. In: Eraydin, A., Taşan-Kok, T. (eds) Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning. GeoJournal Library, vol 106. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics