Skip to main content

The Design Process as a Framework for Collaboration Between Ecologists and Designers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design

Part of the book series: Future City ((FUCI,volume 3))

Abstract

The expanding knowledge from urban ecological research will be critical for enhancing our ecological understanding of cities and for influencing the ability to shape cities to increase ecosystem functions and benefits. Even with the generation of data and the development of ecological theory pertinent to urban systems, the application of ecological understanding to the design and restructuring of urban systems requires additional steps. In particular, design practitioners still need to integrate and apply these ecological concepts. This chapter explores the design process as a tool for applied science. The design process is flexible enough to incorporate ecological input at different stages. However, the process itself favors the working methods of design. Through a case study, the chapter examines the interplay between designers and professional ecologists working together through the design process. This study suggests that facilitating the exchange between designers and ecologists requires a commitment on the part of the designer to provide multiple opportunities for ecological input in the process as well as a more proactive effort on the part of ecologists to provide input at those stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2009) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. BioScience 53:1169–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2008) The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319:769–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benton-Short L (1998) The Presidio: from army post to national park. Northeastern University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2008) Urban principles for ecological landscape design and ­management: scientific fundamentals. Cities Environ 1(2):article 4, 16p

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Grove JM (2006) Integrative approaches to investigating human-natural systems: the Baltimore ecosystem study. Nat Sci Sociétés 14:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Armbrust EV, Arzberger PW, Chapin FS, Elser JJ, Hackett EJ, Ives AR, Kareiva PM, Leibold MA, Lundberg P, Mangel M, Merchant N, Murdoch WW, Palmer MA, Peters DPC, Pickett STA, Smith KK, Wall DH, Zimmerman AS (2009) Accelerate synthesis in ­ecology and environmental sciences. BioScience 59(8):699–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins SL, Carpenter SR, Swinton SM, Orenstein DE, Childers DL, Gragson TL, Grimm NB, Grove JM, Harlan SL, Kaye JP, Knapp AK, Kofina GP, Magnuson JJ, McDowell WH, Melack JM, Ogden LA, Robertson GP, Smith MD, Whitmer AC (2011) An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social–ecological research. Front Ecol Environ 9:351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniak J (2001) Case: Downsview Park Toronto. Prestel Verlag, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson A, Pickett STA (2005) Designed experiments: new approaches to studying urban ­ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 3:549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson A, Pollak L (2010) Defining ecology in ecological urbanism. In: Mostafavi M, Doherty G (eds) Ecological urbanism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (2002) The missing catalyst: design and planning with ecology roots. In: Johnson BR, Hill K (eds) Ecology and design: frameworks for learning. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (2010) Urban ecology, Ecological reviews series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Redman CL (2004) Approaches to the study of urban ecosystems: the case of Central Arizona–Phoenix. Urban Ecosyst 7:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloran P (1998) Seeing the trees through the forest: oaks and history in the Presidio. In: Brook J, Carlsson C, Peters NJ (eds) Reclaiming San Francisco: history, politics, culture. City Lights Books, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR, Silbernagel J, Hostetler M, Mills A, Ndubisi F, Fife E, Rossiter-Hunter M (2002) The nature of dialogue and the dialogue of nature: designers and ecologists in collaboration. In: Johnson BR, Hill K (eds) Ecology and design: frameworks for learning. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundholm JT, Richardson PJ (2010) Habitat analogues for reconciliation ecology in urban and industrial environments. J Appl Ecol 47:966–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ, Breuste JH, Hahs AK (2009) Introduction: scope of the book and need for ­developing a comparative approach to the ecological study of cities. In: McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK, Breuste JH (eds) Ecology of cities and towns. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Musacchio LR (2009) The scientific basis for the design of landscape sustainability: a conceptual framework for translational landscape research and practice of designed landscapes and the six Es of landscape sustainability. Landsc Ecol 24:993–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemela J, Brueste JJ, Elmqvist T, Guntenspergen GR, James P, McIntyre NE (eds) (2011) Urban ecology: patterns, processes, and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson KL, FlorgÃ¥rd C (2009) Ecological scientific knowledge in urban and land-use planning. In: McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK, Breuste JH (eds) Ecology of cities and towns. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace ML, Hampton SE, Limburg KE, Bennett EM, Cook EM, Davis AE, Grove JM, Kaneshiro KY, LaDeau SL, Likens GE, McKnight DM, Richardson DC, Strayer DL (2010) Communicating with the public: opportunities and rewards for individual ecologists. Front Ecol Environ 8:292–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E (2004) Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304:1251–1252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pataki DE, Carreiro MM, Cherrier J, Grulke NE, Jennings V, Pincetl S, Pouyat RV, Whitlow TH, Zipperer WC (2011) Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: ecosystem ­services, green solutions, and misconceptions. Front Ecol Environ 9:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2008) Linking ecological and built components of urban mosaics: an open cycle of ecological design. J Ecol 96:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Groffman PM, Band LE, Boone CG, Burch WR, Grimmond CSB, Hom J, Jenkins JC, Law NL, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Warren PS, Wilson MA (2008) Beyond urban legends: an emerging framework of urban ecology, as ­illustrated by the Baltimore ecosystem study. BioScience 58:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presidio T (2009) The Presidio Trust strategic plan: fiscal year 2005–2009. Presidio Trust, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman CL, Grove JM, Kuby LH (2004) Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach WJ, Heffernan JB, Grimm NB, Arrowsmith JR, Eisinger C, Rychener T (2008) Unintended consequences of urbanization for aquatic ecosystems: a case study from the Arizona desert. BioScience 58:715–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (2003) Win-win ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane DG (2005) Recombinant urbanism: conceptual modeling in architecture, urban design, and city theory. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to express appreciation to EDAW AECOM for ­providing generous funding and support for the project. Thanks especially to Joe Brown, Tim Delorm, Curtis Alling, David Blau, Fran Hegeler and Amanda Walter. I am also grateful to the Presidio Trust for the opportunity to work together to explore the integration of ecology and design. I am especially grateful to Michael Boland and Allison Stone and all workshop participants. Preparation and implementation of the workshop held at the Presidio occurred through a multi-office collaboration with the Ecology and Design team. Thanks to the EDAW team members, including Alma Du Solier, Leo Edson, Debra Bishop and Dawn Cunningham, and to the other participants including Paul Tuttle, Aki Omi, Michelle Dubin, Curtis Alling, David Blau, Steven Hanson, Chris Fitzer, David Lloyd, and Dixi Carillo. An interdisciplinary team in the EDAW New York office completed the post-workshop analysis and book production: Brian Goldberg, Anthony Blanco, Renee Kaufman, Hye Young Choi, Sean Cheng, Tim Terway, Jaman Pablo, Caitrin Higgins, Shaun O’Rourke and Aaron Menkin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander J. Felson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Felson, A.J. (2013). The Design Process as a Framework for Collaboration Between Ecologists and Designers. In: Pickett, S., Cadenasso, M., McGrath, B. (eds) Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design. Future City, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics