Abstract
Developing an effective communication strategy about different food hazards depends not only on technical risk assessments (for example related to health or the environment) but must also take into account consumer perceptions and preferences. In addition, consumers make decisions about food choices or the acceptability of food processing technologies based on their assessment of both risks and benefits, which may include those related to socio-economic or ethical factors. Perceptions and priorities may vary both regionally and within the human life cycle. For example, health is a consumer priority, although the predominant issues of concern vary considerably according to local conditions. In Western and (in some sectors of) emerging economies, obesity continues to represent an important determinant of health. In addition, the ageing population in many countries means that diet may be linked to the development of healthy ageing trajectories, in particular associated with ensuring optimal quality of life through the entirety of the human life cycle. In other regions food security is a priority. Developing effective risk communication about food safety issues requires understanding of consumer perceptions, needs and behaviours and how these vary between different consumers. Risk (benefit) communication is likely to be most effective when targeted at specific groups of consumers with similar needs and interests. Understanding how individuals differ in, for example, their food safety information needs and preferences, how different individuals process food-related risk (and benefit) information, and how these may vary according to psychological and other individual differences will help risk communicators in developing and communicating their messages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bredahl L (2001) Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods – results of a cross-national survey. J Consum Policy 24:23–61
Cope S, Frewer LJ, Houghton J, Rowe G, Fischer ARH, de Jonge J (2010) Consumer perceptions of best practice in food risk communication and management: implications for risk analysis policy. Food Policy 35(4):349–357
Fife-Schaw C, Rowe G (1996) Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: a psychometric study. Risk Anal 16(4):487–500
Fischer ARH, Frewer LJ (2008) Food safety practices in the domestic kitchen: demographic personality and experiential determinants. J Appl Soc Psychol 38:2869–2884
Fischer A, Frewer LJ (2009) Familiarity with foods and the perception of food-related risks and benefits. Food Qual Prefer 20:576–585
Frewer LJ, Shepherd R, Sparks P (1994) The interrelationship between perceived knowledge, control and risk associated with a range of food related hazards targeted at the self, other people and society. J Food Saf 14:19–40
Frewer LJ, Lassen J, Kettlitz B, Scholderer J, Beekman V, Berdal KG (2004) Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food Chem Toxicol 42(7, special issue ENTRANSFOOD):1181–1193
Frewer LJ, Bergmann K, Brennan M, Lion R, Meertens R, Rowe G, Siegrist M, Vereijken C (2011) Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies. Trends in Food Science and Technology 22(8):442–456
Judge TA, Locke EA, Durham CC, Kluger AN (1998) Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations. J Appl Psychol 83(1):17–34
Nauta MJ, Fischer ARH, van Asselt ED, de Jong AEI, Frewer LJ, de Jonge R (2008) Food Safety in the domestic environment: the effect of consumer risk information on human disease risks. Risk Anal 28:179–192
Slovic P, Finucane M, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24(2):311–322
Stewart-Knox BJ, Bunting BP, Gilpin S, Parr HJ, Pinha S, Strain SS, de Almeida MDV, GibneyM (2009) Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sampleof European consumers, British Journal of Nutrition 101:982–989
Tuorila H, Lähteenmäki L, Pohjalainen L, Lotti L (2001) Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Qual Prefer 12:29–37
Van Dijk H, Fischer ARH, De Jonge J, Rowe G, Frewer LJ (in press) The impact of balanced risk-benefit information and prior attitudes on post-information attitudes. J Appl Soc Psychol
Van Dijk H, Fischer ARH, Frewer L (2011) Consumer responses to integrated risk-benefit information associated with the consumption of food. Risk Anal 31(3):429–439
Van Kleef E, Frewer LJ, Chryssochoidis G, Houghton JR, Korzen-Bohr S, Krystallis T, LassenJ, Pfenning U, Rowe G (2006) Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders:results from a cross-European study. Appetite 47(1):46–63
Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Frewer LJ, Sioen I, De Henauw S, Von Camp J (2008) Communicating risks and benefits from fish consumption: impact on belgian consumers’ perception and intention to eat fish, Risk Analysis 28(4):951–967
Verplanken, Orbell S (2003). Refl ections on past behavior. A self report index of habit strength.J Appl Soc Psychol 33(6):1313–1330
Weinstein ND (1987) Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample. J Behav Med 10:481–500
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Frewer, L.J. (2012). Risk Perception, Communication and Food Safety. In: Alpas, H., Smith, M., Kulmyrzaev, A. (eds) Strategies for Achieving Food Security in Central Asia. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2502-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2502-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2501-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2502-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)