Abstract
The argument in this chapter is that school leaders need room to manoeuvre in order to be able to think and act as leaders for learning. Their latitude to manoeuvre is in many ways framed by the structures in which they strive to lead and by the external and internal expectations, both of the school and of school leadership.
The Danish educational system provides the background for analyzing structures in contemporary Neo-Liberal Public Management (NLPM) with its decentralization of finance, administration and influence in polycentric states. It lends itself to the analysis of dominant discourses and social technologies in NLPM. Some key features are a back-to-basics trend and a mix of decentralization and re-centralization, employing both hard and soft governance. It is argued that many of the current social technologies and trends are evident at the transnational level as well. On the basis of a number of initiatives, it becomes apparent that there are developing isomorphic forms of influence.
A number of perspectives have been chosen to illustrate and discuss the broad and diverse range of expectations of school leaders. These include official expectations from government and local authorities, from ideas advanced by the OECD and from leadership theories. The chapter finishes with a presentation and discussion of findings from a successful international school principal research project which examined how school leaders are able to manoeuvre their way through diverse and often conflicting expectations and mandates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
From the Danish part (with John B. Krejsler and Klaus Kasper Kofod) of the ‘The International Successful Principal Project’ (ISSPP) with Christopher Day, University of Nottingham (England), Ken Leithwood, OISE/Utoronto (Canada), Stephen Jacobson, University of Buffalo, (USA), Jorunn Møller, University of Oslo, (Norway), Olof Johansson, University of Umea (Sweden), David Gurr, The University of Melbourne and Bill Mulford, The University of Tasmania (Australia).
References
Antunes, F. (2006). Globalisation and Europeification of education policies: Routes, processes and metamorphoses. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 38–55.
Ball, S. J. (2003). Professionalism, managerialism and performativity. In L. Moos & J. Krejsler (Eds.), Professional development. Copenhagen, Denmark: DPU Press.
Barach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
EC. (2000). Presidency Conclusion, Lisbon, 23–24 March, DOC&00&8.
Foucault, M. (1976). Viljen til viden. Seksualitetens historie 1 [The will to knowledge. The history of sexuality 1]. København, Denmark: Det Lille Forlag.
G8. (2006). http://en-g8russia.ru/news/20060602/1151807.html.
Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352.
Henry, M., Lindgard, B., Rizvi, F., & Raylor, S. (2001). The OECD, globalisation and education policy. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(Spring), 3–19.
Hopman, S. T. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4), 417–456.
Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Teachers College.
Lange, B., & Alexiadou, N. (2007). New forms of European union governance in the education sector? A preliminary analysis of the open method of coordination. European Educational Research Journal, 6(4), 321–335.
Lawn, M., & Lingard, B. (2002). Constructing a European policy space in educational governance: The role of transnational policy actors. European Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 290–307.
Leithwood, K., & Day, C. (Eds.). (2007). Successful school principals: International perspectives. Toronto, Ontario Springer.
Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. L. (1999). A century’s quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook on research on educational research AERA. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership. New York: Teacher College Press.
Leithwood, K., Begley, P., & Cousins, J. B. (1994). Developing expert leadership for future schools. London: Falmer press.
Lingard, B. (2000). It is and it isn’t: Vernacular globalization, educational policy, and restructuring. In N. C. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Martin, H.-P., & Schumann, H. (1997). Globaliseringsfælden. Angrebet på demokrati og velstand [The globalizational trap. The attack on democracy and welfare]. København, Denmark: Borgen.
Ministry of Education. (2006). Consolidation Act No. 170 of 2 June 2006. Ministry of Education.
Moos, L. (2006a). A real change or a change in rhetoric? – Comments to two OECD reviews on educational research: England in 2002 and Denmark in 2004. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 63–67.
Moos, L. (2006b). Fra politiske demokratidiskurser mod markedsorienterede effektivitetsdiskurser [From political discourses of democracy towards market oriented efficiency discourses]. Nordisk Pedagogik, 26(4), 322–332.
Moos, L. (2006c). What kinds of democracy in education are facilitated by supra- and transnational agencies? European Educational Research Journal, 5(3 & 4), 160–168.
Moos, L. (2008) School leadership for ‘Democratic Bildung’: Fundamentlist beliefs or critical reflection? In: School Leadership and Management, 28(3), 229–246.
Moos, L. (2009a). Hard and soft governance: The journey from transnational agencies to school leadership. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 397406.
Moos, L. (2009b). A general context for new social technologies. Nordic Educational Research, 29(1), 79–92.
Moos, L., & Johansson, O. (2009). The international successful school principalship project: Success sustained? Journal of Educational Administration, 47(6), 765–780.
Moos, L., & Kofod, K. K. (2009). Danish successful school leadership – revisited. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(6), 709–718.
Moos, L., Krejsler, J., Kofod, K., & Jensen, B. B. (2005). Successful school principalship in Danish schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 563–572.
Moos, L., Krejsler, J., Kofod, K., & Jensen, B. B. (2007). Communicative strategies among successful Danish school principals. In C. Day & K. Leithwood (Eds.), Principal leadership in times of change. Twente, the Netherlands: Springer.
Moos, L., Kofod, K., & Krejsler, J. (2008). Successful principals: Telling or selling? – On the importance of context for school leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(4), 341–352.
OECD. (1998). Education catalogue. Paris: OECD.
Pedersen, D. (2005). Ledelsesrummet i managementstaten [The leadership space in the management state]. In D. Pedersen (Ed.), Offentlig ledelse i managementstaten [Public leadership in the management state]. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.
Pitman, A. (2008). Capacity-building in South-East Asian Universities: International challenges. Paper presented at the Korean Education Research Association, Seul, South Korea.
Schuller, T. (2006). Reviewing OECD’s educational research reviews. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 57–61.
Schuller, T., Jochems, W., Moos, L., & Zanten, Av. (2006). Evidence and policy research. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 57–70.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34.
Stacey, R. D. (2000). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity. Harlow, UK: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
Warren, M. E. (1999). Democratic theory and trust. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Weick, K. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization: The impermanent organization. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Zanten, Av. (2006). Evidence and policy in education: A complex relationship. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 67–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moos, L. (2011). Transnational and Local Conditions and Expectations on School Leaders. In: Townsend, T., MacBeath, J. (eds) International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1349-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1350-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)