Skip to main content

Provision of Agricultural Ecosystem Services

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

Synonyms

Agricultural ecosystems; Conservation agriculture; Ecosystem services; Sustainable agriculture

Introduction

An ecosystem is a community of living organisms, including plants, animals, and microbes, plus the nonliving components of their environment, such as water and minerals, interacting together as a system or an ecological unit (e.g., a pasture or forest). Ecosystems may also be viewed as a form of natural capital, which provides flows of vital goods and services to humans (e.g., Daily 1997). These goods and services are called ecosystem services (ES) and are often defined as the “benefits people obtain either directly or indirectly from ecosystems” (MEA 2005). Many ES are critical to human survival (e.g., climate regulation and nutrient cycling), while others contribute to our well-being (e.g., nature recreation and rural lifestyles) (Kremen 2005).

Scientists and scholars have traditionally focused on natural ecosystems, such as wetlands and ponds, for ES provision (e.g.,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antle, J. M., & Capalbo, S. M. (2002). Agriculture as a managed ecosystem: Policy implications. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, H. W. (1997). Grass roots collective action: Agricultural opportunities. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 22, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, E. (2007). Soil biota, ecosystem services and land productivity. Ecological Economics, 64, 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (1986). Local level management and the commons problem: A comparative study of Turkish coastal fisheries. Marine Policy, 10, 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer, I., Mϋssner, R., Marsden, K., Oosterhuis, F., Rayment, M., Miller, C., & Dodoková, A. (2006). The use of market incentives to preserve biodiversity ECOLOGIC, p. 51, Final report: a project under the framework contract for economic analysis. ENV.G.1/FRA/2004/0081

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M. S. (2005). Barriers to the adoption of sustainable agriculture on rented land: An examination of contesting social fields. Rural Sociology, 70, 387–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M. S. (2006). Do you see what I see? Examining the epistemic barriers to sustainable agriculture. Rural Sociology, 71, 232–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G., Cumming, D., & Redman, C. (2006). Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: Causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. C. (Ed.). (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press. 392 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, V. H., & Polasky, S. (2007). Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 64, 286–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, M. L., & Van den Bosch, R. (1981). Introduction to integrated pest management. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., Helkowski, J. H., Holloway, T., Howard, E. A., Kucharik, C. J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J. A., Prentice, C., Ramankutty, N., & Snyder, P. K. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309, 570–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R. L., Thompson, B. H., & Daily, G. C. (2007). Institutional incentives for managing the landscape: Inducing cooperation for the production of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 64, 333–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. (2001). Breaking down the barriers: The Schoharie county local agri-preneurship project for next generation farmers. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 19, 85–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R. S., & Walker, P. (2002). How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koundouri, P., Nauges, C., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2006). Technology adoption under production uncertainty: Theory and application to irrigation technology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88, 657–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C. (2005). Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters, 8, 468–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger, T., & Casey, F. (2007). An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecological Economics, 64, 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lant, C. L., Ruhl, J. B., & Kraft, S. E. (2008). The tragedy of ecosystem services. BioScience, 58, 969–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative watershed management: A view from the grassroots. Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), 341–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrae, R. J., Henning, J., & Hill, S. B. (1993). Strategies to overcome barriers to the development of sustainable agriculture in Canada: The role of agribusiness. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 6, 21–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Current state and trends (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2009). Analyzing collective action. In Keynote papers presented in the plenary sessions of the 27th conference of the international association of agricultural economists, Beijing, 16–22 Aug 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2001). Reformulating the commons. In B. Joanna, O. Elinor, R. B. Norgaard, P. David, & B. D. Goldstein (Eds.), Protecting the commons: A framework for resource management in the Americas (pp. 17–41). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelosi, C., Goulard, M., & Balent, G. (2010). The spatial scale mismatch between ecological processes and agricultural management: Do difficulties come from underlying theoretical frameworks? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 139(4), 455–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, A. G. (2010). Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2959–2971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. (2003). Social Capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302, 1912–1914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raedeke, A. H., Nilon, C. H., & Rikoon, J. S. (2001). Factors affecting landowner participation in ecosystem management: A case study in south-central Missouri. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29(1), 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. P., & Swinton, S. M. (2005). Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, J. M., Molnar, J. J., Fazio, R. A., Sydnor, E., & Lowe, M. J. (2009). Barriers to adoption of sustainable agriculture practices: Change agent perspectives. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 24, 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, A., Ross, H., & Shrestha, K. K. (2008). A common-pool resource approach for water quality management: An Australian case study. Ecological Economics, 68, 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallman, H. R. (2011). Ecosystem services in agriculture: Determining suitability for provision by collective management. Ecological Economics, 71, 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinton, S. M., Lupi, F., Robertson, G. P., & Hamilton, S. K. (2007). Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecological Economics, 64, 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418, 671–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wossink, A., & Swinton, S. M. (2007). Jointness in production and farmers’ willingness to supply non-marketed ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 64, 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Ricketts, T. H., Kremen, C., Carney, K., & Swinton, S. M. (2007). Ecosystem services and Dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics, 64, 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi R. Stallman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stallman, H.R., James Jr., H.S. (2014). Provision of Agricultural Ecosystem Services. In: Thompson, P.B., Kaplan, D.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0929-4_137

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0929-4_137

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0928-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0929-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics