Abstract
In Europe and North America, long-term ecological research (LTER) networks are changing their treatment of human activity from exogenous ‘disturbances’ to endogenous behaviour. The engagement of social scientists in LTER networks currently takes forms ranging from nonexistent, to research in parallel with ecological research but with minimal interaction, to truly collaborative long-term socio-ecological research (LTSER). Successful collaboration of social and ecological scientists can be facilitated by a ‘jazz band’ approach that allows shifting multidisciplinary leadership along with disciplinary research solos. Socio-ecological simulation modelling can serve as a common tool for analysing complex dynamics of the interacting systems. The design criteria for an LTSER network should include socio-economic as well as ecological factors in order to ensure that findings can be extrapolated in both dimensions, an approach currently being followed in Europe. However, due to evolving societal needs, socio-ecological research should also be occurring outside the network of LTSER sites. New governmental initiatives on both sides of the Atlantic have the potential to enable more and better socio-ecological research than in the past.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Grove, J. Morgan. Personal communication by email to Scott M. Swinton, October 6, 2007.
- 2.
A criterion for the spatial extent of the sites to be selected - although important in ecological studies - was intentionally not included in the list. The size of the social system is determined by other criteria, such as income, markets and demography. Therefore the number and characteristics of ecological units (ecosystems, watersheds) should be adjusted to the meta-level aim of improving research collaboration between natural and social scientists to enhance our understanding of the interacting systems, society and nature.
References
Antle, J. M., Capalbo, S. M., Elliott, E. T., Hunt, H. W., Mooney S., & Paustian, K. H. (2001). Research needs for understanding and predicting the behavior of managed ecosystems: Lessons from the study of agroecosystems. Ecosystems, 4, 723–735.
Benedick, R. E. (1991). Ozone diplomacy. Harvard: University Press.
Bockstael, N. E., Freeman, A. M., Kopp, R. J., Portney, P. R., & Smith, V. K. (2000). On measuring economic values for nature. Environmental Science & Technology, 34, 1384.
Carpenter, S. R., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Mooney, H. A., Polasky, S., Reid, W. V., et al. (2006). Millennium ecosystem assessment: Research needs. Science, 314, 257–258.
Collins, S. L., Swinton, S. M., Anderson, C. W., Benson, B. J., Brunt, J., Gragson, T., et al. (2007). Integrated science for society and the environment: A strategic research initiative. Publication #23 of the U.S. LTER Network, LTER Network Office. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.
COM. (2005). Draft declaration on guiding principles for sustainable development. Communication from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council and the European Parliament 218. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2005/com2005_0218en01.pdf.
Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., DeGroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260.
Cumming, G. S., Cumming, D. H., & Redman, C. L. (2006). Scale mismatches in socio-ecological systems: Causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecology and Society, 11, 14.
Dirnböck, Th., Bezák, P., Dullinger, S., Haberl, H., Lotze-Campen, H., Mirtl, M., et al. (Eds.). (2006). Scaling issues in long-term socio-ecological biodiversity research: A review of European cases. Social Ecology Working Paper 100. Vienna: KlagenfurtUniversity.
Drechsler, M., Grimm, V., Mysiak, J., & Wätzold, F. (2007). Differences and similarities between ecological and economic models for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics, 62, 232–241.
Drechsler, M., Johst, K., Ohl, C., & Wätzold, W. (2007). Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity. Conservation Biology, 21, 1475–1486.
EEA. (1999a). Environment in the European Union at the turn of the century. Environmental assessment report No 2. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
EEA. (1999b). Environmental indicators: Typology and overview. Technical report No 25. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
Gragson, T. L., & Grove, M. (2006). Social science in the context of the Long Term Ecological Research Program. Society and Natural Resources, 19(1), 93–100.
Gragson, T. L., & Bolstad, P. V. (2006). Land use legacies and the future of Southern Appalachia. Society and Natural Resources, 19(1), 175–190.
Grimm, N., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T. A., & Redman, C. L., (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience, 50, 571–584.
Grove, J. M., Cadenasso, M. L., Burch, W. R., Pickett, S. T. A., Schwarz, K., Neil-Dunne, J., et al. (2006). Data and methods comparing social structure and vegetation structure of urban neighborhoods in Baltimore, Maryland. Society and Natural Resources, 19(1), 117–136.
Haberl, H., Winiwarter, V., Andersson, K., Ayres, R. U., Boone, C., Castillo, A., et al. (2006). From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of long-term socioecological research. Ecology and Society, 11(2). Retrieved from URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art13/.
Jentsch, A., Wittmer, H., Jax, K., Ring, I., & Henle, K. (2003). Biodiversity. Emerging issues for linking natural and social sciences. GAIA, 12, 121–128.
Johst, K., Drechsler, M., & Wätzold, F. (2002). An ecological-economic modelling procedure to design effective and efficient compensation payments for the protection of species. Ecological Economics, 41, 37–49.
Kareiva, P., Watts, S., McDonald, R., & Boucher, T. (2007). Domesticated nature: Shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science, 316, 1866–1869.
King, R. P., Lybecker, D. W., Regmi, A., & Swinton, S. M. (1993). Bioeconomic models of crop production systems: Design, development, and use. Review of Agricultural Economics, 15, 393–405.
MASR. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Scientific Report). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Mirtl, M. (2004, July). LTER in Austria: Implementing multifunctional research platforms (MFRPs) for LTER. Paper presented at the ILTERN Coordinating Committee Meeting 7–9 July, Manaus, Brazil. Retrieved from http://www.ilternet.edu/meetings/.
Nelson, G. C., Bennett, E., Berhe, A. A., Cassman, K., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., et al.. (2006). Anthropogenic drivers of ecosystem change: An overview. Ecology and Society, 2, 29. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art29/.
Nowak, P., Bowen, S., & Cabot, P. E. (2006). Disproportionality as a framework for linking social and biophysical systems. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 153–173.
Oberthür, S., & Ott, H. E. (1999). The Kyoto protocol. Berlin: Springer.
Ohl, C., Krauze, K., & Grünbühel, C. (2007). Towards an understanding of long-term ecosystem dynamics by merging socio-economic and environmental research. Criteria for Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research Sites Selection. Ecological Economics, 63, 383–391.
Parr, T. (2006). Research Integration for the CBD. ALTERNews, 02, Retrieved from http://www.alter-net.info.
Pearce, D. 1998. Auditing the Earth. Environment, 40, 23.
Perrings, C. (2002). Modelling sustainable ecological-economic development. International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001/2, 179–201.
Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M., Nilon, C. H., Pouyat, R. V., Zipperer, W. C., et al. (2001). Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 127–157.
Redman, C. L., Grove, J. M., & Kuby, L. H. (2004). Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (LTER) network: Social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems, 7, 161–171.
Roughgarden, J. (2001). Guide to diplomatic relations with economists. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 82, 85–88.
Shogren, J. F., Parkhurst, G. M., & Settle, C. (2003). Integrating economics and ecology to protect nature on private lands: Models, methods and mindsets. Environmental Science and Policy, 6, 233–242.
Siepel, H. (2006). LTSER-sites in Europe. A preliminary selection. Retrieved from http://www.alter-net.info.
Siepel, H., & Furman, E. (2006). Biodiversity at Stake: Do we need a multi-disciplinary approach? ALTERNews, 02. Retrieved from http://www.alter-net.info.
Spalatro, F., & Provencher, B. (2001). An analysis of minimum frontage zoning to preserve lakefront amenities. Land Economics, 77, 469–481.
Svarstad, H., Petersen, L. K., Rothman, D., Siepel, H., & Wätzoldt, F. (2008). Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR. Land Use Policy, 25, 116–125.
Swinton, S. M., Lupi, F., Robertson, G. P., & Hamilton, S. K. (2007). Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecological Economics, 64, 245–252.
Swinton, S. M., Lupi, F., Robertson, G. P., & Landis, D. A. (2006). Ecosystem services from agriculture: Looking beyond the usual suspects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88, 1160–1166.
Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Lehman, C. (2005). Diversity, productivity and temporal stability in the economies of humans and nature. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49, 405–426.
Tschirhart, J. (2004). A new adaptive system approach to predator-prey modeling. Ecological Modelling, 176, 255–276.
UFZ Biodiversity Research Strategy. (2007). Biodiversity and ecosystem functions under global change. Concept paper. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ.
U.S. National Research Council. (2005). Decision making for the environment.
UNMP. (2005). Investing in development: A practical plan to achieve the millennium development goals, overview (United Nations Millennium Project). Washington, DC: Communications Development Inc.
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science, 277, 494–499.
Wätzold, F., Drechsler, M., Armstrong, C. W., Baumgärtner, S., Grimm, V., Huth, A., et al. (2006). Ecological-economic modelling for biodiversity management: Potential, pitfalls, and prospects. Conservation Biology, 20, 1043–1041.
Wätzold, F., Lienhoop, N., Drechsler, M., & Settele, J. (2008): Estimating optimal conservation in agricultural landscapes when costs and benefits of conservation measures are heterogeneous in space and over time, Ecological Economics, 68(1–2), 295–305.
Wear, D. N., & Bolstad, P. (1998). Land-use changes in Southern Appalachian landscapes: Spatial analysis and forecast evaluation. Ecosystems, 1, 575–594.
Zhang, W., & Swinton, S. M. (2009). Incorporating natural enemies in an economic threshold for dynamically optimal pest management. Ecological Modelling, 220, 1315–1324.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge support from ALTER Net (A Long-Term Biodiversity, Ecosystem and Awareness Research Network) funded by the EU’s sixth Framework Programme, as well as support from the National Science Foundation under Long-Term Ecological Rresearch (KBS-LTER) Grant No. 0423627. We thank Frank Wätzold, Irene Ring, Ted Gragson, Morgan Grove and Bill Provencher for helpful comments. We are also indebted to Prof. em. Wolfgang Haber and to an anonymous referee for stimulating comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ohl, C., Swinton, S.M. (2010). Integrating Social Sciences into Long-Term Ecological Research. In: Müller, F., Baessler, C., Schubert, H., Klotz, S. (eds) Long-Term Ecological Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8782-9_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8782-9_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8781-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8782-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)