Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptualising Long-Term Socio-ecological Research (LTSER): Integrating the Social Dimension

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Long-Term Ecological Research

Abstract

In order to support the emerging network of long-term ecological research (LTER) sites across Europe, the European Union has launched ALTER-Net, a network aiming at lasting integration of long-term socio-economic, ecological and biodiversity research. Due to its high population density and long history of human habitation, however, Europe’s ecosystems are generally intensively used. Social and natural drivers are so inextricably intertwined that the notion of ‘socio-ecological’ systems is appropriate. Traditional natural science-based approaches are insufficient to understand these integrated systems, as they cannot adequately capture their relevant socio-economic dimensions. This is particularly relevant because the EU launched ALTER-Net has an explicit aim to support sustainability, a goal that requires integration of socio-economic and ecological dimensions. As such, LTER is challenged to significantly expand its focus from ecological to socio-ecological systems, thus transforming itself from LTER to long-term socio-ecological research or LTSER. In order to support this transformation, this chapter explores several approaches for conceptualising socio-economic dimensions of LTSER. It discusses how the socio-economic metabolism approach can be combined with theories of complex adaptive systems to generate heuristic models of society–nature interaction which can then be used to integrate concepts from the social sciences. In particular, the chapter discusses possible contributions from the fields of ecological anthropology and ecological economics and shows how participatory approaches can be integrated with innovative agent-based modelling concepts to arrive at an integrated representation of socio-ecological systems that can help to support local communities to move towards sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abel, T. (1998). Complex adaptive systems, evolutionism, and ecology within anthropology: Interdisciplinary research for understanding cultural and ecological dynamics. Georgia Journal of Ecological Anthropology, 2, 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, W. M., Brockington, D., Dyson, J., & Vira, B. (2003). Managing tragedies: Understanding conflict over common pool resources. Science, 302, 1915–1916.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo, J., Kreileman, E., & Leemans, R. (1996). Global models meet global policy: How can global and regional modellers connect with environmental policy makers? What has hindered them? What has helped? Global Environmental Change, 6, 255–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. H. F., Bandurski, B., & King, A. (1993). The ecosystem approach: Theory and ecosystem integrity (Report to the Great Lakes Advisory Board). Windsor, Ontario: International Joint Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, R. L., Andrews, C. J., & Small, M. J. (2002). Agent-based modelling and industrial ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. U., & Simonis, U. E. (1994). Industrial metabolism: Restructuring for sustainable development. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. L., Albert, R., & Jeong, H. (2000). Scale-free characteristics of random networks: The topology of the world-wide web. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 281, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Bianconi, G. (2000). Power-law distribution of the World Wide Web. Science, 287, 2115a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, A., & Spencer, J. (1996). Encyclopedia of social and cultural anthropology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss-Smith, T. (1974). Constrains on population growth: The case of the Polynesian outlier atolls in the precontact period. Human Ecology, 2, 259–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. W. (1976). The Ecological transition: Cultural anthropology and human adaption. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (Eds.), Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2003). Socio-technical regimes and transition contexts. Brighton: University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, R. L. (1978). Alternative adaptation strategies in the prehistoric Great Basin. Journal of Anthropological Research, 34, 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1965). The conditions of agricultural growth – the economics of agrarian change under population pressure. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1981). Population and technological change – A study of long-term trends. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., & Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4, 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. R., Jr. (2002). Has the Durkheim legacy misled sociology? In R. E. Dunlap, F. H. Buttel, P. Dickens, & A. Gijswijt (Eds.), Sociological theory and the environment. Classical foundations, contemporary insights (pp. 90–115). Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. C., Crutzen, P. J., & Schellnhuber, H.-J. (2004). Science for global sustainability. In H.-J. Schellnhuber, P. J. Crutzen, W. C. Clark, M. Claussen, & H. Held (Eds.), Earth system analysis for sustainability. Report of the 91st Dahlem Workshop (pp. 1–28). Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Cumberland, J., Daly, H. E., Goodland, R., & Norgaard, R. B. (1998). An introduction to ecological economics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croll, E., & Parkin, D. (1992). Anthropology, the environment and development. In E. Croll & D. Parkin (Eds.), Bush base: Forest farm (pp. 1–10). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P. L., & Moore, S. (2001). Approaches for quantifying the metabolism of physical economies, Part I: Methodological overview. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, J. A., Graumlich, L. J., Grove, R., Grübler, A., Haberl, H., Hole, F., et al. (2006). Integrating socio-environment interactions over centennial timescales: Needs and issues. Dahlem Workshop Report 96. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffuant, G., Huet, S., Bousset, J. P., Henriot, J., Amon, G., & Weisbuch, G. (2002). Agent-based simulation of organic farming conversion in Allier department. In M. Janssen (Ed.), Complexity and ecosystem management: The theory and practice of multi-agent systems (pp. 158–187). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbaere, B. (2005). European policy review: Biodiversity research to support European policy. Journal of Nature Conservation, 13, 213–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descola, P., & Pálsson, G. (1996). Nature and society. Anthropological perspectives. London, New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R., Jr. (1994). Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalizaton of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist, 25, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R. (2002). Which function(s) of the environment do we study? A comparison of environmental and natural resource sociology. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J., Martinez, N. D. (2002). Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: Robustness increases with connectance. Ecology Letters, 5, 558–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA. (1995). Europe’s environment: The Dobris assessment. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2001). Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators. A methodological guide. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1997a). Dynamik und Selbststeuerung industrieller Gesellschaften. In M. Fischer-Kowalski, H. Haberl, W. Hüttler, H. Payer, H. Schandl, V. Winiwarter, & Zangerl-Weisz, H. (Eds.), Gesellschaftlicher Stoffwechsel und Kolonisierung von Natur. Ein Versuch in Sozialer Ökologie (pp. 203–221). Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach Fakultas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1997b). Society’s metabolism: On the childhood and adolescence of a rising conceptual star. In M. Redclift & G. R. Woodgate (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 119–137). Cheltenham, Northhampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (1997). Tons, joules and money: Modes of production and their sustainability problems. Society and Natural Resources, 10, 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (2006). Global environmental change and socio-ecological transitions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., Haberl, H., Hüttler, W., Payer, H., Schandl, H., Winiwarter, V., et al. (1997). Gesellschaftlicher Stoffwechsel und Kolonisierung von Natur. Ein Versuch in Sozialer Ökologie. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach Fakultas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Weisz, H. (1999). Society as hybrid between material and symbolic realms. Toward a Theoretical Framework of Society-Nature Interaction. Advances in Human Ecology, 8, 215–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., Walker, B., et al. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31, 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D., Swanson, F., Aber, J., Burke, I., Brokaw, N., Tilman, D., et al. (2003). The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience, 53, 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1974). Marxism, structuralism and vulgar materialism. Man, 9, 444–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25, 739–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaube, V., Adensam, H., Erb, K.-H., & Haberl, H. (2005, August). Modelling the impacts of CAP 2006 on sustainable regional development considering land use change, social structure and economic performance. An Austrian case study. Paper presented at the “45th Congress of the Regional Science Association”, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaube, V., Kaiser, C., Wildenberg, M., Adensam, H., Fleissner, P., Kobler, J., et al. (2009). Combining agent-based and stock-flow modelling approaches in a participative analysis of the integrated land system in Reichraming, Austria. Landscape Ecology, 24(9), 1149–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1995). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, D., & Kittel, T. G. F. (2002). Temporal variability of climate at the US Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites. Climate Research, 19, 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, B. (1998). Die Rohstoffe der oberösterreichischen Eisenwurzen. In: R. Sandgruber (Ed.), Land der Hämmer – Heimat Eisenwurzen. Die Oberösterreichische Landesausstellung 1998 und die Region Pyhrn-Eisenwurzen (pp. 24–35). Salzburg: Residenz-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbühel, C. M., Haberl, H., Schandl, H., & Winiwarter, V. (2003). Socio-economic metabolism and colonization of natural processes in SangSaeng village: Material and energy flows, land use, and cultural change in Northeast Thailand. Human Ecology, 31, 53–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy. Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H. (1997). Human propriation of net primary production as an environmental indicator: Implications for sustainable development. Ambio, 26, 143–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H. (2001a). The energetic metabolism of societies, Part I: Accounting concepts. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H. (2001b). The energetic metabolism of societies, Part II: Empirical examples. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., Krausmann, F., Loibl, W., Schulz, N. B., & Weisz, H. (2001). Changes in ecosystem processes induced by land use: Human appropriation of net primary production and its influence on standing crop in Austria. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 15(4), 929–942..

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Weisz, H., & Winiwarter, V. (2004). Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy, 21, 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H., Winiwarter, V., Andersson, K., Ayres, R. U., Boone, C., Castillo, A., et al. (2006). From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of long-term socioecological research. Ecology and Society, 11, 13. From URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art13/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H., Gaube, V., Díaz-Delgado, R., Krauze, K., Neuner, A., Peterseil, J., et al. (2009). Towards an integrated model of socioeconomic biodiversity drivers, pressures and impacts. A feasibility study based on three European long-term socio-ecological research platforms. Ecological Economics, 68(6), 1797–1812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. A. S. (1995). Maximum Power. The Ideas and Applications of H.T. Odum. Niwot, Colorado: The University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. A. S., Cleveland, C. J., & Kaufmann, R. K. (1986). Energy and resource quality, the ecology of the economic process. New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, M., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002). Stakeholder categorisation in participatory integrated assessment processes. Integrated Assessment, 3, 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie, J. E., Carpenter, S. R., Grimm, N. B., Gosz, J. R., & Seastedt, T. R. (2003). The US long term ecological research program. BioScience, 53, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecological Systematics, 4, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1986). The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In W. C. Clark & R. E. Munn (Eds.), Sustainable development of the biosphere (pp. 292–320). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holten-Andersen, J., Paalby, H., Christensen, N., Wier, M., & Andersen, F.M. (1995). Recommendations on Strategies for Integrated Assessment of Broad Environmental Problems. Report Submitted to the European Environmental Agency (EEA) by the National Environmental Research Institute (NERI). Copenhagen: National Environmental Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (1989). Eine sozialwissenschaftliche Interpretation der Humanökologie. In B. Glaeser(Ed.), Humanökologie, Grundlagen präventiver Umweltpolitik (pp. 57–75). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, A. M. (2004). Agent-based models. In J. Proops & P. Safonov (Eds.), Modelling in ecological economics (pp. 155–172). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasemir, B., Jäger, J., Jaeger, C. C., & Gardner, M. T. (2003). Public participation in sustainability science. A handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292, 641–642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffmann, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of complexity. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. J., Regier, H. A., Boyle, M., & Francis, G. (1999). An ecosystem approach for sustainability: Addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures, 31, 721–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1967). The ghost in the machine. London, UK: Arkana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausmann, F. (2004). Milk, manure and muscular power. Livestock and the industrialization of agriculture. Human Ecology, 32, 735–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausmann, F., & Haberl, H. (2002). The process of industrialization from the perspective of energetic metabolism. Socioeconomic energy flows in Austria 1830–1995. Ecological Economics, 41, 177–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausmann, F., Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., & Wackernagel, M. (2004). Resource flows and land use in Austria 1950–2000: Using the MEFA framework to monitor society-nature interaction for sustainability. Land Use Policy, 21, 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krech, S. I. (1978). Disease, starvation and Northern Athapaskan social organisation. American Ethnology, 5, 710–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees, S. H. (1974). Hydraulic development as a process of response. Human Ecology, 2, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1986). Ökologische Kommunikation: Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf ökologische Gefährdungen einstellen? Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luks, F. (1996). Post-Normal Science, Dematerialisierung und die Ökonomie – Über den (wirtschafts) wissenschaftlichen Umgang mit Umweltproblemen. In J. Köhn & M. J. Welfens (Eds.), Neue Ansätze in der Umweltökonomie (pp. 89–108). Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, P., & Rotmans, J. (2002). Transitions in a globalising world. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J. (1987). Ecological economics. Energy, environment and society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J. (Ed.) (1990). Ecological economics. Energy, evironment and society. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, E., Amann, C., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Bringezu, S., Hüttler, W., Kleijn, R., et al. (2000). The weight of nations: Material outflows from industrial economies. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (2006). The People and Landscape Model (PALM): An agent-based spatial model of livelihood generation and resource flows in rural households and their environment. Ecological Modelling, 194, 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R., & Selman, P. (2006). Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, K. S. (2000). The diversity-stability debate. Nature, 405, 228–233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, W. (2001). Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change. Belgium: LUCC International Project Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, W. B., & Turner, B. L. I. (1994). Changes in land use and land cover, a global perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R. M. (1993). Smallholders, householders. farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R. B. (1994). The coevolution of economic and environmental systems and the emergence of unsustainability. In R. England (Ed.), Evolutionary concepts in contemporary economics (pp. 213–225). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC. (2004). NEON, addressing the nations environmental challenges. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T., & Pinkerton, R. C. (1955). Time’s speed regulator: The Optimum efficiency for maximum power output in physical and biological systems. American Scientist, 43, 331–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith, A. (1977). Traditional agriculture, central places, and postdisaster urban relocation in Peru. American Ethnology, 4, 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlove, B. S. (1980). Ecological anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 235–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlove, B. S., & Custtred, G. (1980). The alternative model of agrarian society in the Andes: Households, networks and corporate groups. In B. S. Orlove & G. Custtred (Eds.), Land and power in Latinamerica: Agrerian economics and social processes in the Andes (pp. 31–54). New York: Holmes & Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1996). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002). Participative and stakeholder-based policy design, evaluation and modelling processes. Integrated Assessment, 3, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1976). Order through fluctuations: Self-organisation and social systems. In E. Jantsch & C. H. Waddington (Eds.), Evolution and consciousness: Human systems in transition (pp. 93–130). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1967). Pigs for the ancestors. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1971). The flow of energy in an agricultural society. Scientific American, 225, 116–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman, C. L. (1999). Human dimensions of ecosystem studies. Ecosystems, 2, 296–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman, C. L., Grove, J. M., & Kuby, L. H. (2004). Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (LTER) network: Social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems, 7, 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyna, S. P. (1975). Making do when the rain stops: Adjustment of the domestic structure to climate variation among the Barma. American Ethnologist, 2, 535–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & Van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schandl, H., & Grünbühel, C. M. (2005). Using land-time budgets to analyse farming systems and poverty alleviation policies in Lao PDR. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 5, 142–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schandl, H., & Schulz, N. B. (2002). Changes in United Kingdom´s natural relations in terms of society’s metabolism and land use from 1850 to the present day. Ecological Economics, 41, 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591–596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber, H. J. (1999). ‘Earth system’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution. Nature, 402, C19-C23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, W. H. (1997). Biogeochemistry – An analysis of global change. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. J. (2003). In the sea of influence: A world system perspective of the Nicobar Islands. Lund: Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. H. (1955). Theory of culture change. The methodology of multilinear evolution. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teich, M., Porter, R., & Gustafsson, B. (1997). Nature and society in historical context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1988). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L. I., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., et al. (2003). Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 100, 8080–8085.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2002). Global Environment Outlook 3. Past, present and future perspectives. London: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadineanu, A. (1998). Sustainable development, theory and practice. Bucarest: Bucarest University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadineanu, A. (2001). Sustainable development: Theory and practice regarding the transition of socio-economic systems towards sustainability. Bucarest: UNESCO – CEPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadineanu, A., Adamescu, M. C., Cazacu, C., Bodescu, F., & Danielescu, S. (2001). Past and future management of the Lower Danube Wetlands. Working paper of the Departement of System Ecology. Bucarest: Bucarest University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadineanu, A., Adamescu, M. C., Vadineanu, R. S., Christofor, S., & Negrei, C. (2003). Past and future management of the Lower Danube Wetland System: A bioeconomic appraisal. The Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 14, 415–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Leeuw, S. E. (2004). Why Model? Cybernetics and Systems, 35, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Leeuw, S. E., & Aschan-Leygonie, C. (2005). A long-term perspective on resilience in socio-natural systems. In H. Liljenström, & U. Svedin (Eds.), Micro, Meso, Macro. Addressing Complex Systems Couplings (pp. 227–264). New Jersey: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Keulen, H. (1993). Options for agricultural development: A new quantitative approach. In F. W. T. PenningDeVries, P. Teng, & K. Metselaar (Eds.), Systems approaches for agricultural development (pp. 355–365). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. G., Maturana, H. R., & Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems, 5, 187–196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vayda, A. P., & MacKay, B. (1977). Problems in the identification of environmental problems. In T. P. Bayliss-Smith & R. G. A. Feachem (Eds.), Subsistence and survival: Rural ecology in the Pacific (pp. 476–498). New York, London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., & Matson, P. A. (1986). Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. BioScience, 36, 363–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M. (1999). Ecological economics forum: Why sustainability analysis must include biophysical assessments. Ecological Economics, 29, 13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N. B., Deumling, D., Linares, A. C., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V., et al. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 9266–9271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, E. (1975). How the Enga cope with frost: Responses to climatic perturbations in the Central Highlands of New Guinea. Human Ecology, 3, 249–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. Retrieved from URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., & Meyers, J. A. (2004). Thresholds in Ecological and Social-Ecological Systems: A Developing Database. Science and Society, 9(2), 3. Retrieved from URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltner-Toews, D., & Kay, J. J. (2005). The evolution of an ecosystem approach: The diamond schematic and an adaptive methodology for ecosystem sustainability and health. Ecology and Society, 10(1), 38. Retrieved from URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art38/..

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltner-Toews, D., Kay, J. J., Neudoerffer, C., & Gitau, T. (2003). Perspective changes everything: Managing ecosystems from the inside out. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 1, 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of `small-world’ networks. Nature, 393, 440–442.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). World commission on environment and development: Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, H. (2002). Gesellschaft-Natur Koevolution: Bedingungen der Möglichkeit nachhaltiger Entwicklung. Dissertation, Humboldt Universität, Berlin..

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Grünbühel, C. M., Haberl, H., Krausmann, F., & Winiwarter, V. (2001). Global environmental change and historical transitions. Innovation – The European Journal of Social Sciences, 14, 117–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, H., Krausmann, F., Amann, C., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K.-H., Hubacek, K., et al. (2006). The physical economy of the European Union: Cross-country comparison and determinants of material consumption. Ecological Economics, 58, 676–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A. (1959). The evolution of culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbanks, T. J., & Kates, R. W. (1999). Global change in local places: How scale matters. Climatic Change, 43, 601–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial support by ALTER-Net, a Network of Excellence funded by the EU within its sixth Framework Programme, by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture within the projects ‘partizipA’ (Cultural Landscapes Research) and the project ‘LTSER Eisenwurzen’ (proVISION). This research also contributes to the Global Land Project (GLP). We thank H. Adensam, M. Fischer-Kowalski, K.H. Erb, S. Gingrich and F. Krausmann for useful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Social Ecology, Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies, Klagenfurt University, Schottenfeldgasse 29, 1070, Vienna, Austria

    Simron J. Singh

  2. Institute of Social Ecology, Klagenfurt University, Schottenfeldgasse 29, 1070, Vienna, Austria

    Helmut Haberl, Veronika Gaube, Julia Lutz & Martin Wildenberg

  3. Sustainable Ecosystems Division, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, Australia

    Clemens M. Grünbühel

  4. Department of Systems Ecology and Sustainability (DSES), University of Bucharest, Spl. Independentei 91-95, Sector 5, Bucharest, Romania

    Petru Lisivieveci & Angheluta Vadineanu

  5. Integrated Land Use Systems Group, Macaulay Institute, AB15 8QH, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, UK

    Robin Matthews

  6. Federal Environment Agency Austria (Umweltbundesamt), Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090, Wien, Austria

    Michael Mirtl

Authors
  1. Simron J. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helmut Haberl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Veronika Gaube
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Clemens M. Grünbühel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Petru Lisivieveci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Julia Lutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Robin Matthews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Michael Mirtl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Angheluta Vadineanu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Martin Wildenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simron J. Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ökologie-Zentrum, Universität zu Kiel, Olshausenstr. 75, Kiel, 24118, Germany

    Felix Müller

  2. Dept. Biozönoseforschung, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, Halle, 06120, Germany

    Cornelia Baessler

  3. Universität Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 3, Rostock, 18055, Germany

    Hendrik Schubert

  4. Dept. Biozönoseforschung, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, Halle, 06120, Germany

    Stefan Klotz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Singh, S.J. et al. (2010). Conceptualising Long-Term Socio-ecological Research (LTSER): Integrating the Social Dimension. In: Müller, F., Baessler, C., Schubert, H., Klotz, S. (eds) Long-Term Ecological Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8782-9_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation