Synonyms
Gravity: spectral methods; Potential field transforms
Definition
Spectral analysis. Estimation and analysis of global frequency content of a signal, assumed stationary, most often using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT).
Potential field transformations. Process of converting gravity (or magnetic) survey data into a new and physically meaningful form to facilitate its geological interpretation.
Euler and Werner deconvolution. Methods for automatically estimating depths to sources from gravity (or magnetic) survey data.
Wavelet analysis. Estimation and analysis of local frequency content of a non-stationary signal, using a wavelet transform (WT).
Introduction
The use of spectral analysis to interpret gravity anomalies goes back to the 1930s, but the modern approach in terms of the Fourier transform (FT) was developed in the 1960s and 1970s. Most of the methods are equally applicable to magnetic data, which is their more common area of use because of the huge volume of...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Addison, P. S., 2002. The Illustrated Wavelet Transform Handbook. Bristol: Institute of Physics.
Antoine, J.-P., Murenzi, R., Vandergheynst, P., and Ali, S. T., 2004. Two-dimensional Wavelets and Their Relatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blakely, R. J., 1995. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chambodut, A., Panet, I., Mandea, M., Diament, M., Holschneider, M., and Jamet, O., 2005. Wavelet frames: an alternative to spherical harmonic representation of potential fields. Geophysical Journal International, 163, 875–899.
Dransfield, M. H., and Lee, J. B., 2004. The Falcon® airborne gravity gradiometer survey systems, in R.J.L. Lane, ed. Airborne Gravity 2004 - Abstracts from the ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2004 Workshop: Geoscience Australia Record 2004/18, 15–19.
FitzGerald, D., Reid, A., and McInerney, P., 2004. New discrimination techniques for Euler deconvolution. Computers and Geosciences, 30, 461–469.
Foufoula-Georgiou, E., and Kumar, P. (eds.), 1994. Wavelets in Geophysics. San Diego: Academic.
Grant, F. S., and West, G. F., 1965. Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics. New York: McGraw Hill.
Grossman, A., and Morlet, J., 1984. Decomposition of Hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 15, 723–736.
Hornby, P., Boschetti, F., and Horowitz, F. G., 1999. Analysis of potential field data in the wavelet domain. Geophysical Journal International, 137, 175–196.
Jacobsen, B. H., 1987. A case for upward continuation as a standard separation filter for potential field maps. Geophysics, 52, 1138–1148.
Keller, W., 2004. Wavelets in Geodesy and Geodynamics. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kirby, J. F., 2005. Which wavelet best reproduces the Fourier power spectrum? Computers and Geosciences, 31, 846–864.
Kirby, J. F., and Swain, C. J., 2009. A reassessment of spectral T e estimation in continental interiors: the case of North America. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, B08401, doi:10.1029/2009JB006356.
Klees, R., and Haagmans, R. (eds.), 2000. Wavelets in the Geosciences. Berlin: Springer.
Kumar, P., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E., 1997. Wavelet analysis for geophysical applications. Reviews of Geophysics, 35, 385–412.
Li, X., 2006. Understanding 3D analytic signal amplitude. Geophysics, 71, L13–L16, doi:10.1190/1.2184367.
Mikhailov, V., Pajot, G., Diament, M., and Price, A., 2007. Tensor deconvolution: a method to locate equivalent sources from full tensor gravity data. Geophysics, 72, 161–169, doi:10.1190/1.2749317.
Moreau, F., Gibert, D., Holschneider, M., and Saracco, G., 1997. Wavelet analysis of potential fields. Inverse Problems, 13, 165–178.
Mushayandebvu, M. F., Lesur, V., Reid, A. B., and Fairhead, J. D., 2001. Magnetic source parameters of two-dimensional structures using extended Euler deconvolution. Geophysics, 66, 814–823.
Nabighian, M. N., 1984. Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations. Geophysics, 49, 780–786.
Nabighian, M. N., 2005. Historical development of the gravity method in exploration. Geophysics, 70, 63ND–89ND, doi:10.1190/1.2133785.
Nabighian, M. N., and Hansen, R. O., 2001. Unification of Euler and Werner deconvolution in three dimensions via the generalised Hilbert transform. Geophysics, 66, 1805–1810.
Nettleton, L. L., 1976. Gravity and Magnetics in Oil Prospecting. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Panet, I., Chambodut, A., Diament, M., Holschneider, M., and Jamet, O., 2006. New insights on intraplate volcanism in French Polynesia from wavelet analysis of GRACE, CHAMP, and sea surface data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, B09403, doi:10.1029/2005JB004141.
Parker, R. L., 1972. The rapid calculation of potential anomalies. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 31, 447–455.
Reid, A. B., Allsop, J. M., and Granser, H., 1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics, 55, 80–91.
Ridsdill-Smith, T. A., and Dentith, M. C., 1999. The wavelet transform in aeromagnetic processing. Geophysics, 64, 1003–1013.
Spector, A., and Grant, F. S., 1970. Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics, 35, 293–302.
Thompson, D. T., 1982. EULDPH: a new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics, 47, 31–37.
Torrence, C., and Compo, G. P., 1998. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 779, 61–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Swain, C.J., Kirby, J.F. (2011). Gravity Data, Advanced Processing. In: Gupta, H.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8702-7_89
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8702-7_89
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8701-0
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8702-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences