Skip to main content

Inverse Theory, Linear

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series ((EESS))

Introduction

The activity of solving inverse problems is all pervading. We perform this activity throughout our life right since birth. As a new born baby the first inverse problem we solve, albeit through pattern recognition, is identification of mother in a group of persons. In this vein, the geophysical inverse problems are just a member of the class of inverse problems encountered and studied in science. Formally, the inverse problem can be defined as an estimation of system parameters together with their uncertainties from the observed system response to a given source excitation. In contrast, the forward problem is defined as computation of response of the system for a given model of its properties and for a given source excitation. Most of the geophysical inverse problems are nonlinear by virtue of the system response being a nonlinear function of system parameters. However, a widely employed class of methodologies solves the nonlinear inverse problems through...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aki, K., and Richards, P. G., 2002. Quantitative Seismology. Sausalito: University Science Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus, G. E., 1970. Inference from inadequate and inaccurate data. Proceedings of the National Academic Science, 65, 1–7, 281–287; 67, 282–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus, G. E., 1996. Trimming and procrastination as inversion techniques. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 98, 101–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus, G. E., and Gilbert, J. F., 1967. Numerical applications of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 13, 247–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus, G., and Gilbert, J. F., 1968. Numerical applications of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 16, 169–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus, G., and Gilbert, J. F., 1970. Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London A, 266, 123–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorck, A., 1996. Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems. Philadelphia: SIAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcea, L., 2002. Electrical impedance tomography – topical review. Inverse Problems, 18(6), R99–R136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvetti, D., Morigi, S., Reichel, L., and Sgallari, F., 2000. Tikhonov regularization and the L-curve for large discrete ill-posed problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 123, 423–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, D. P., 1971a. The application of linear filter theory to the direct interpretation of geoelectrical resistivity sounding measurements. Geophysical Prospecting, 19, 192–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, D. P., 1971b. Inverse filter coefficients for the computation of resistivity standard curves for a horizontally stratified earth. Geophysical Prospecting, 19, 769–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P. K., 1998. The Backus Gilbert method. In Indira, N. K., and Gupta, P. K. (eds.), Inverse Methods: General Principles and Applications in Earth System Sciences. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, Chap. 7, pp. 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P. K., Sri Niwas, and Gaur, V. K., 1996. Straightforward inversion scheme (SIS) for one-dimensional magnetotelluric data. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Science (EPS), 105(4), 413–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P. K., Niwas, S., and Gaur, V. K., 1997. Straightforward inversion of vertical electrical sounding data. Geophysics, 62(3), 775–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habashy, T. M., and Abubakar, A., 2004. A General framework for constraint minimization for the inversion of electromagnetic measurements. Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER, 46, 265–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J., 1902. Sur les problemes aux derives partielles et leur signification physique. Princeton University Bulletin, 13, 49–52. Reprinted in his Oeuvres, Vol. III, Centre Nat. Recherche Sci., Paris, 1968, 1099–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. C., 1992. Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve. SIAM Review, 34, 561–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indira, N. K., and Gupta, P. K. (eds.), 1998. Inverse Methods: General Principles and Applications to Earth System Sciences. New Delhi: Narosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. D., 1972. Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient, and inconsistent data. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 28, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. D., 1979. The use of a-priori data to resolve non-uniqueness in linear inversion. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 57, 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunetz, G., 1972. Processing and interpretation of magnetotelluric soundings, Geophysics, 37, 1005–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C. L., and Hanson, R. J., 1995. Solving Least Squares Problems. Philadelphia: SIAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lines, L. R., and Treitel, S., 1984. Tutorial: a review of least-squares inversion and its application to geophysical problems. Geophysical Prospecting, 32, 159–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallat, S., 2009. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing: The Sparse Way. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menke, W., 1984. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E. H., 1920. On the reciprocal of the general algebraic matrices. Bulletin of American Mathematical Society, 26, 394–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, D. W., 1976. Calculation of Fourier transform by the Backus-Gilbert method, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 44(2), 413–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, D. W., and Li, Y., 2004. Inversion for Applied Geophysics – A Tutorial, presented at EMI workshop held at Hyderabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R., 1955. A generalized inverse for matrices. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 51, 406–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A. R., and Bhimasankaram, P., 1992. Linear Algebra. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R., and Mitra, S. K., 1971. Generalized Inverse of Matrices and Its Applications. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlinson, N., Pozgay, S., and Fishwick, S., 2010. Seismic tomography: a window into deep Earth – review. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 178, 101–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichel, L., and Sadok, H., 2008. A new L-curve for ill-posed problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 219, 493–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezghi, M., and Hosseini, S. M., 2009. A new variant of L-curve for Tikhonov regularization. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 231, 914–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M., and Sorensen, D. C., 2002. A trust region approach to the regularization of large scale discrete forms of ill-posed problems. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing, 23(6), 1843–1861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Tarantola, S., and Campolongo, F., 2006. Sensitivity analysis practices: strategies for model based inferences – review. Reliability Engineering and Safety, 91, 1109–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scales, J. A., Smith, M. L., and Treitel, S., 2001. Introductory Geophysical Inverse Theory. Golden, White River Junction: Smizdat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneider, R., and Trampert, J., 1999. Inverse problems in geophysics. In Wirgin, A. (ed.), Wavefield Inversion. New York: Springer, pp. 119–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarantola, A., 2005. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. Philadelphia: SIAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikhanov, A. N., and Arsenin, V. Y., 1977. Solutions Ill-Posed Problems. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treitel, S., and Lines, L., 2001. Past, present, and future of geophysical inversion – a new millennium analysis. Geophysics, 66(1), 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twomey, S., 1977. Introduction to the Mathematics of Inversion in Remote Sensing and Indirect Measurements. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhdanov, M. S., 2002. Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pravin K. Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Gupta, P.K. (2011). Inverse Theory, Linear. In: Gupta, H.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8702-7_151

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics