Introduction
The activity of solving inverse problems is all pervading. We perform this activity throughout our life right since birth. As a new born baby the first inverse problem we solve, albeit through pattern recognition, is identification of mother in a group of persons. In this vein, the geophysical inverse problems are just a member of the class of inverse problems encountered and studied in science. Formally, the inverse problem can be defined as an estimation of system parameters together with their uncertainties from the observed system response to a given source excitation. In contrast, the forward problem is defined as computation of response of the system for a given model of its properties and for a given source excitation. Most of the geophysical inverse problems are nonlinear by virtue of the system response being a nonlinear function of system parameters. However, a widely employed class of methodologies solves the nonlinear inverse problems through...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Aki, K., and Richards, P. G., 2002. Quantitative Seismology. Sausalito: University Science Book.
Backus, G. E., 1970. Inference from inadequate and inaccurate data. Proceedings of the National Academic Science, 65, 1–7, 281–287; 67, 282–289.
Backus, G. E., 1996. Trimming and procrastination as inversion techniques. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 98, 101–142.
Backus, G. E., and Gilbert, J. F., 1967. Numerical applications of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 13, 247–273.
Backus, G., and Gilbert, J. F., 1968. Numerical applications of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 16, 169–205.
Backus, G., and Gilbert, J. F., 1970. Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London A, 266, 123–192.
Bjorck, A., 1996. Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems. Philadelphia: SIAM.
Borcea, L., 2002. Electrical impedance tomography – topical review. Inverse Problems, 18(6), R99–R136.
Calvetti, D., Morigi, S., Reichel, L., and Sgallari, F., 2000. Tikhonov regularization and the L-curve for large discrete ill-posed problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 123, 423–446.
Ghosh, D. P., 1971a. The application of linear filter theory to the direct interpretation of geoelectrical resistivity sounding measurements. Geophysical Prospecting, 19, 192–217.
Ghosh, D. P., 1971b. Inverse filter coefficients for the computation of resistivity standard curves for a horizontally stratified earth. Geophysical Prospecting, 19, 769–775.
Gupta, P. K., 1998. The Backus Gilbert method. In Indira, N. K., and Gupta, P. K. (eds.), Inverse Methods: General Principles and Applications in Earth System Sciences. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, Chap. 7, pp. 60–68.
Gupta, P. K., Sri Niwas, and Gaur, V. K., 1996. Straightforward inversion scheme (SIS) for one-dimensional magnetotelluric data. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Science (EPS), 105(4), 413–429.
Gupta, P. K., Niwas, S., and Gaur, V. K., 1997. Straightforward inversion of vertical electrical sounding data. Geophysics, 62(3), 775–785.
Habashy, T. M., and Abubakar, A., 2004. A General framework for constraint minimization for the inversion of electromagnetic measurements. Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER, 46, 265–312.
Hadamard, J., 1902. Sur les problemes aux derives partielles et leur signification physique. Princeton University Bulletin, 13, 49–52. Reprinted in his Oeuvres, Vol. III, Centre Nat. Recherche Sci., Paris, 1968, 1099–1105.
Hansen, P. C., 1992. Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve. SIAM Review, 34, 561–580.
Indira, N. K., and Gupta, P. K. (eds.), 1998. Inverse Methods: General Principles and Applications to Earth System Sciences. New Delhi: Narosa.
Jackson, D. D., 1972. Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient, and inconsistent data. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 28, 97–109.
Jackson, D. D., 1979. The use of a-priori data to resolve non-uniqueness in linear inversion. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 57, 137–158.
Kunetz, G., 1972. Processing and interpretation of magnetotelluric soundings, Geophysics, 37, 1005–1021.
Lawson, C. L., and Hanson, R. J., 1995. Solving Least Squares Problems. Philadelphia: SIAM.
Lines, L. R., and Treitel, S., 1984. Tutorial: a review of least-squares inversion and its application to geophysical problems. Geophysical Prospecting, 32, 159–186.
Mallat, S., 2009. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing: The Sparse Way. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Menke, W., 1984. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. Orlando: Academic.
Moore, E. H., 1920. On the reciprocal of the general algebraic matrices. Bulletin of American Mathematical Society, 26, 394–395.
Oldenburg, D. W., 1976. Calculation of Fourier transform by the Backus-Gilbert method, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 44(2), 413–431.
Oldenburg, D. W., and Li, Y., 2004. Inversion for Applied Geophysics – A Tutorial, presented at EMI workshop held at Hyderabad.
Penrose, R., 1955. A generalized inverse for matrices. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 51, 406–413.
Rao, A. R., and Bhimasankaram, P., 1992. Linear Algebra. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
Rao, C. R., and Mitra, S. K., 1971. Generalized Inverse of Matrices and Its Applications. New York: Wiley.
Rawlinson, N., Pozgay, S., and Fishwick, S., 2010. Seismic tomography: a window into deep Earth – review. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 178, 101–135.
Reichel, L., and Sadok, H., 2008. A new L-curve for ill-posed problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 219, 493–508.
Rezghi, M., and Hosseini, S. M., 2009. A new variant of L-curve for Tikhonov regularization. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 231, 914–924.
Rojas, M., and Sorensen, D. C., 2002. A trust region approach to the regularization of large scale discrete forms of ill-posed problems. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing, 23(6), 1843–1861.
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Tarantola, S., and Campolongo, F., 2006. Sensitivity analysis practices: strategies for model based inferences – review. Reliability Engineering and Safety, 91, 1109–1125.
Scales, J. A., Smith, M. L., and Treitel, S., 2001. Introductory Geophysical Inverse Theory. Golden, White River Junction: Smizdat.
Sneider, R., and Trampert, J., 1999. Inverse problems in geophysics. In Wirgin, A. (ed.), Wavefield Inversion. New York: Springer, pp. 119–190.
Tarantola, A., 2005. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. Philadelphia: SIAM.
Tikhanov, A. N., and Arsenin, V. Y., 1977. Solutions Ill-Posed Problems. New York: Wiley.
Treitel, S., and Lines, L., 2001. Past, present, and future of geophysical inversion – a new millennium analysis. Geophysics, 66(1), 21–24.
Twomey, S., 1977. Introduction to the Mathematics of Inversion in Remote Sensing and Indirect Measurements. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific.
Zhdanov, M. S., 2002. Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems. New York: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Gupta, P.K. (2011). Inverse Theory, Linear. In: Gupta, H.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8702-7_151
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8702-7_151
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8701-0
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8702-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences