Abstract
Managing in recovering markets is focused on the improvement of business performance. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) business solutions are key enablers for transforming business processes which lead to better business performance. Companies are facing the challenge of how to improve the use of ERP business solutions by its employees, and therefore, understanding of factors that impact ERP acceptance by employees is very important. Technology acceptance model (TAM) is one of the most widely used models for explaining the behavioural intention and actual usage and can improve understanding of how influence on actual usage could help increase efficiency and effectiveness of business solutions and other solutions use. This paper analyses existing extensions of TAM regarding ERP business solutions acceptance in organisations and proposes further factors which are needed for more comprehensive explanations of ERP business solutions acceptance. The cognitive construct of work compatibility is included in the model and the construct of extended use which replaces the construct of actual use is introduced. Furthermore, the impact of cognitive construct of work compatibility, solutions usefulness and solution ease of use on attitude towards using the solution are explained and the construct of extended use of business solution is discussed. Survey data has been collected from ERP business solutions users in companies where the ERP system has been in use for more than 1 year, and therefore, the solutions use can be defined as a mature one. The research model was analysed by using the PLS approach and some key findings are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adam F, Sammon D (2004) The enterprise resource planning decade: lesson learned and issues for the future. Idea Group Publishing, USA
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179â211
Amoako-Gyampah K, Salam AF (2004) An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inf Manag 41:731â745
Bradford M (2008) Modern ERP â select, implement & use todayâs advanced business systems. College of management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Bradley J, Lee CC (2007) ERP training and user satisfaction: a case study. Int J Enterp Inf Syst 3(4):33â55
Brown SA, Massey AP, Montoya-Weiss MM, Burkman JR (2002) Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. Eur J Inf Syst 11(4):283â295
Bueno S, Salmeron JL (2008) TAM-based success modelling in ERP. Interact Comput 20(6):515â523
Calisir F, Gumussoy CA, Bayram A (2009) Predicting the behavioural intention to use enterprise resource planning systems â an exploratory extension of the technology acceptance model. Manag Res Newsl 32(7):597â613
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319â340
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982â1003
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Gattiker TF, Goodhue DL (2005) What happens after ERP implementation: understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Q 29(3):559â585
Heijden H (2001) Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in the Netherlands. e-Everything: e-Commerce, e-Government, e-Household, e-Democracy in 14th Bled electronic commerce conference. Bled Slovenia
Hong KK, Kim YG (2002) The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. Inf Manag 40(1):25â40
Hsieh JJPA, Wang W (2007) Explaining employeesâ extended use of complex information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 16(3):216â227
Hwang YJ (2005) Investigating enterprise systems adoption: uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation and the technology acceptance model. Eur J Inf Syst 14(2):150â161
Kwahk KY, Lee JN (2008) The role of readiness for change in ERP implementation: theoretical bases and empirical validation. Inf Manag 45(7):474â481
Lee DH, Lee SM, Olson DL, Chung SH (2010) The effect of organizational support on ERP implementation. Ind Manag Data Syst 110(1â2):269â283
Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P (2003) Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manag 40:191â204
Liu L, Ma Q (2006) Perceived system performance: a test of an extended technology acceptance model. J Organ End User Comput 18(3):1â24
Lu J, Chun-Sheng Y, Liu C, Yao JE (2003) Technology acceptance model for wireless internet, internet research. Electron Netw Appl Policy 13(3):206â222
Markus LM, Tanis C (2000) The enterprise system experience: from adoption to success. Framing the domains of IT management: projecting the future through the past. Pinnafex Educational Resources Inc., Cincinnati
Motiwalla LF, Thompson J (2009) Enterprise systems for management. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Nah FF, Tan X, Teh SH (2004) An empirical investigation on end-usersâ acceptance of enterprise systems. Inf Resour Manag J 17(3):32â53
Pijpers GGM, Montfort K (2006) An investigation of factors that influence senior executives to accept innovations in information technology. Int J Manag 23(1):11â23
Ross JW, Vitale MR (2000) The ERP revolution: surviving vs. Thriving. Inf Syst Front 2(2):233â241
Saeed K, Abdinnour S, Lengnick-Hall ML, Lengnick-Hall CA (2010) Examining the impact of pre-implementation expectations on post-implementation use of enterprise systems: a longitudinal study. Decis Sci 41(4):659â688
Scott JE, Walczak S (2009) Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance. Inf Manage 46(4):221â232
Shih YY, Huang SS (2009) The actual usage of ERP systems: an extended technology acceptance perspective. J Res Pract Inf Technol 41(3):263â276
Shivers-Blackwell SL, Charles AC (2006) Ready, set, go: examining student readiness to use ERP technology. J Manag Dev 25(8):795â805
Simon SJ, Paper D (2007) User acceptance of voice recognition technology: an empirical extension of the technology acceptance model. J Organ End User Comput 19(1):24â50
Sun Y, Bhattacherjee A, Ma Q (2009) Extending technology usage to work settings: the role of perceived work compatibility in ERP implementation. Inf Manag 46:351â356
Uzoka FME, Abiola RO, Nyangeresi R (2008) Influence of product and organizational constructs on ERP acquisition using an extended technology acceptance model. Int J Enterp Inf Syst 4(2):67â83
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186â205
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis FD, Davis GB (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425â479
Youngberg E, Olsen D, Hauser K (2009) Determinants of professionally autonomous end user acceptance in an enterprise resource planning system environment. Int J Inf Manag 29:138â144
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zabukovšek, S.S., Bobek, S. (2015). ERP Business Solutions Acceptance in Companies. In: Chatterjee, S., Singh, N., Goyal, D., Gupta, N. (eds) Managing in Recovering Markets. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1979-8_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1979-8_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1978-1
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1979-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)