Skip to main content

Combining Ensemble of Classifiers Using Voting-Based Rule to Predict Radiological Ratings for Lung Nodule Malignancy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Emerging Research in Electronics, Computer Science and Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 248))

Abstract

In this paper, we are proposing new ensemble strategy for classification of lung nodules based on their malignancy ratings. The procedure we followed is simpler. In the first step, we construct different homogenous ensemble models such as bagged decision tree (BaDT), boosted decision tree (BoBT), and random subspace–based decision tree (RSSDT). In the next step, we combine previously constructed models with voting scheme to yield ensemble of homogenous ensemble of classifiers. We also examine the behavior of our method for heterogeneity in the system. This is done by constructing ensemble of heterogeneous ensemble of classifiers. For this, we have also considered bagged KNN (BaKNN), boosted KNN (BoKNN), bagged PART (BaPART), and boosted PART classifier (BoPART). The results we are obtaining from our strategy are significant compared to homogenous ensemble model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) available at http://ncia.nci.nih.gov

  2. Varutbangkul E, Mitrovic V, Aichu D, Furst J (2008) Combining boundaries abd rating from multiple observers for predicting lung nodule characteristics. In: IEEE international conference on biocomputing, bioinformatics and biomedical technologies, pp 82–87

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ebadollahi S, Johnson DE (2008) Diao M. Retrieving clinical cases through a concept space representation of text and images. SPIE Med, Imaging Symp

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nakumura K, Yoshida H, Engelmann R. MacMahon H, Kasturagawa S, Ishida T, et al (2000) Computerized analysis of the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with use of artificial neural networks. Radiology, pp 823–30

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kuncheva LI, Rodr′ıguez JJ, Plumpton CO, Linden DEJ, Johnston SJ (2010) Random subspace ensembles for fMRI classification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(2):531–542

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zinovev D, Raicu D, Furst J, Armato SG (2009) Predicting radiological panel opinions using a panel of machine learning classifiers. Algorithms 2:1473–1502. doi:10.3390/a2041473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vinay K, Rao A, Hemantha Kumar G Comparative study on performance of single classifier with ensemble of classifiers in predicting radiological experts ratings on lung nodules. Indian international conference on artificial intelligence (IICAI-11). ISBN: 978-0-9727412-8-6, pp 393–403

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vinay K, Rao A, Hemantha Kumar G Computerized analysis of classification of lung nodules and comparison between homogeneous and heterogeneous ensemble of classifier model. 2011 third national conference on computer vision, pattern recognition, image processing and graphics, 978-0-7695-4599-8/11, IEEE doi:10.1109/NCVPRIPG.2011.56, pp 231–234

  9. Kuncheva LI (2004) Combining pattern classifiers: methods and algorithms. Wiley, Inc, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Kittler, M. Hatef, Robert P.W. Duin, J. Matas (1998). On combining classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 20(3):226–239

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Breiman. Bagging predictors. Technical Report 421, Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Freund Y, Schapire RE (1997) A decision–theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55(1):119–139

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho TK (1998) The random space method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20(8):832–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Vinay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vinay, K., Rao, A., Hemanthakumar, G. (2014). Combining Ensemble of Classifiers Using Voting-Based Rule to Predict Radiological Ratings for Lung Nodule Malignancy. In: Sridhar, V., Sheshadri, H., Padma, M. (eds) Emerging Research in Electronics, Computer Science and Technology. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 248. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1157-0_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1157-0_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1156-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1157-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics