Abstract
In paid crowdsourcing environment an organization post a task/problem atvarious platform like freelancer.com and the mass (crowd/developer) is invited to complete the problem. This environment is becoming an emerging trend to solve a problem with the brain of mass. At present the allocation and the payment made to the developers are mostly based on first price auction. However there is always a chance for manipulation in first price auction and also what punishment a developer should get if he try to do the same i.e. he can’t complete the task/problem within the stipulated time mentioned in his bid (if they manipulate by day to get the project) or try to manipulate the money demanded for project completion is not addressed. In this paper we have developed an incentive compatible mechanism that will prevent the developer from doing manipulation and also a novel penalty scheme is incorporated in our mechanism so that, the punishment-to-developer problem could be handle in an efficient way.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Patton, M.A., Jsang, A.: Technologies for Trust in E-Commerce. In: Proceedings of the IFIP Working Conference on E-Commerce, Salzburg, Austria (June 2001)
Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., Kuwabara, K.: Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM 43(12), 45–48 (2000); Brent Frei: Paid Crowdsourcing - Smartsheet, Produced by Smartsheet.com. A leading provider of paid crowdsourcing technology & services, Version 1.00.00 - Release Version. pp. 4, 6 (2009)
Brabham, D.C.: Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14(1), 75–90 (2008)
Horton, J.J., Zeckhauser, R.J.: Algorithmic Wage Negotiations: Applications to Paid Crowdsourcing. In: Crowd Conf. 2010, San Francisco, CA (2010)
Nishan, N., Roughgarden, T., et al.: Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press (2007)
Nisan, N., Ronen, A.: Algorithmic Mechanism Design. Games Econ. Behav. 35, 166–196 (2001)
Vickery, W.: Counter Speculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders. J. Economic Theory, 187–217 (1961)
Vukovic, M.: Crowdsourcing for Enterprises. In: 2009 World Conference on Services-I, Los Angeles, CA (2009)
Azer, M.A., El-Kassas, S.M., Hassan, A.W.F., El-Soudani, M.S.: A Survey on Trust and Reputation Schemes in Ad Hoc Networks. In: Third International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (2008)
Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., Lockwood, K.: The Value of Reputation on eBay: A Controlled Experiment. Experimental Economics 9(2), 79–101 (2006)
Hood, W., Wilson, C.S.: The Value of Reputation: The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics. Scientometrics 52(2), 291–314 (2001)
Archak, N.: Money, Glory and Cheap Talk: Analyzing Strategic Behavior of Contestants in Si-multaneous Crowdsourcing Contests on TopCoder.com. In: International World Wide Web Conference Committee, IW3C2 (2010)
Myerson, R.: Perspectives on mechanism design in economic theory. Prize Lecture, Department of Economics, University of Chicago (2008)
Narhari, Y.: Lecture notes on Mechanism Design. IISc Banglore, pp. 1–11 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer India
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gupta, S., Mukhopadhyay, S., Gosh, D. (2013). An Efficient Incentive Compatible Mechanism for Paid Crowdsourcing. In: Kumar M., A., R., S., Kumar, T. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Computing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 174. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0740-5_72
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0740-5_72
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-0739-9
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-0740-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)