Skip to main content

Urban Dualism in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area

  • Chapter
Megacities

Part of the book series: Library for Sustainable Urban Regeneration ((LSUR,volume 10))

Abstract

The growth of the Jakarta Metropolitan Areas (JMA) has been very rapid and intense, particularly in the last three decades. Jakarta began as a tiny town named Sunda Kelapa in 1527 with a population of less than 100,000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jabodetabek was formerly known as Jabotabek, based on a plan which was initially developed with the assistance of the Dutch Government in 1970. (The concept of Jabotabek was coined by a Dutch consultant in 1970.) The planning concept was inspired by the model of Randstad in the Netherlands (Giebels 1986). The concept includes self-contained growth centers. Two main models were introduced, one concentric and the other linear. Since then, the plan has been reviewed three times; however there has been no significant alteration to the basic concept, except for updated forecasts of population growth. The last review, conducted in 1992, reiterated the plan for development along east-west and north-south axes. The plan, however, is not legally binding.

  2. 2.

    Silver (2008) noted that the spatial change actually started after the 1900s with the colonization of Batavia.

  3. 3.

    In 2008 the companies registered as members of REI was 1,900 (interview with REI President, March 2008).

  4. 4.

    Kampung is an Indonesian word for an informal and incrementally developed settlement in an urban area.

  5. 5.

    The concept of sustainable urban form has been much debated recently; see for instance Williams et al. (2000). Borrowing from their work, urban form is taken to be sustainable if it “enables the city to function within its natural and man-made carrying capacity; is ‘user friendly’ for its occupants; and promotes social equity.”

  6. 6.

    Cultuurstelsel was a system enforced by the Dutch colonial government whereby peasants were required to grow export crops on a certain percentage of their land or, alternatively, to work for a number of days annually on state plantations or other state projects (Marcussen 1990).

  7. 7.

    Menteng is an expensive housing area in the centre of Jakarta now. This area was a European quarter just at the end of the old Batavia.

  8. 8.

    Kebayoran Baru is a new town in the south of Jakarta, planned by Thomas Karsten, a prominent architect involved in the creation of the first planning act in Indonesia in 1945, and planner for several other cities in Indonesia.

  9. 9.

    Perseroan Terbatas means Limited Company.

  10. 10.

    Ciputra became the most prominent person in land development in Indonesia. He was the president of the International Real Estate Federation (FIABCI), and owns several of the largest real estate companies in Indonesia.

  11. 11.

    Pertamina is the only state oil company which had an important role during the first decade of the Suharto’s administration. Ibnu Sutowo, the president of the company, acted as the president’s political financier (Winters 1991). In an interview with Winters, Sutowo is reported to have said: “You can’t find a single road or school or hospital that wasn’t at least partly funded by the money I borrowed through Pertamina.” Winters’s dissertation on the political economy in Indonesia gives a good picture of the role of Pertamina at that time.

  12. 12.

    The Rupiah depreciated from approximately 2,500 Rupiah per US$1 in 1995 to approximately 10,000 Rupiah per US$1 in May 1998.

  13. 13.

    In 1976, the number of poor people was 54.2 million (or 40.08 % of total population). The number had decreased to about 22.5 million (11.34 %) in 1996, just before the crash.

  14. 14.

    The increasing number of people living in poverty was due to a rise in the level of the poverty line, from Rp. 42.220 (US$4.20) in 1996 to about Rp. 96.959 (US$9.60) in 1998 in urban areas and from Rp. 31.141 (US$3.15) to Rp. 72.780 (US$7.20) in rural areas. The shift in the poverty line was the result of substantial changes in relative prices.

  15. 15.

    This information is based on statistical data which defines urban as functionally urban. “Urban” in Indonesia has two definitions: one is by function, and the other is by administrative area. According to the functional definition, each of the smallest administrative units (desa or kelurahan) is accorded a functional urban or rural status based on its characteristics. BPS (Indonesia’s Statistical Bureau) defines urban by function and this definition can be changed over time as areas become more densely populated or less agricultural, or as they gain urban facilities and services (Gardiner and Gardiner 2006).

  16. 16.

    An exchange rate of Rp. 1 million = US$100 is used throughout this article.

  17. 17.

    Winarso (2002) notes that average household size in new towns in Kabupaten Tangerang is 4.3, lower than the figure for Jakarta (4.7) or for Indonesia (4.5).

  18. 18.

    Sinar Mas Group is owned by Muchtar Wijaya, an Indonesian real estate tycoon.

  19. 19.

    In Indonesia, where the total population reached 206.6 million in 2000 (BPS 2000) those living in urban areas in 2000 made up 42.0% of the total population (BPS 2000). Almost 71% of the urban population consisted of those from moderate- and low-income groups. The current median monthly household incomes (50th percentile) for urban areas within and outside DKI Jakarta are Rp. 950, 000 and Rp. 892, 000, respectively. The median household income in rural areas is Rp. 579,300 (Hoek-Smit 2001). Only about 15% of the urban population can afford to buy a better house. The large majority, 45%, can buy only simple houses and require loans or subsidies to do so.

  20. 20.

    These figures are from BPS (1994). The inflation rate is not calculated.

  21. 21.

    At least three conservation plans for Condet were prepared in the 1990s by Dinas Tata Bangunan & Pemugaran (Building and Conservation Office), Dinas Kebudayaan (Culture Office), and Dinas Tata Kota (Urban Planning Office) in DKI Jakarta.

References

  • Alexander HB (2004) “City walk, town square, walk around, and soon ……”. In: Properti Indonesia, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa EM (2001). Urban spatial segregation and social differentiation: foundation for a typological analysis. In: Conference paper. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt G et al. (2006) Immigrants on the housing market: spatial segregation and relocation dynamics. In: Paper for the ENHR conference “housing in an expanding Europe, Sloveni

    Google Scholar 

  • BPS (1994) Population statistics for Indonesia. Available at http://www.bps.go.id

  • BPS (2000) Population statistics for Indonesia. Available at http://www.bps.go.id

  • BSD City (2004) Development progress report

    Google Scholar 

  • Colliers International Indonesia (2006) Quarterly Research Report: Jakarta. Colliers International, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Cybriwsky R, Ford LR (2001) City profile: Jakarta. Cities 18(3):199–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demographia (2009) Demographia world urban areas & population projections. Available at http://www.demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf

  • Firman T, Dharmapatni IAI (1994) The challenges to sustainable development in Jakarta metropolitan region. Habitat International, 18(3), pp. 79–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner P, Gardiner MO (2006) Ecology of population dynamic in Indonesian metropolitan areas. In: Winarso H (ed) Metropolitan in Indonesia, fact and challenges for spatial planning. Directorate General for Spatial Planning, Ministry of Public Works, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Giebels LJ (1986) Jabotabek: an Indonesian–Dutch concept on metropolitan planning of the Jakarta-region. In: Nas PJM (ed) The Indonesian city. Foris Publication, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill H (1996) The Indonesian economy since 1966. Cambridge University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek-smit (2001) Effective demand for low and moderate income housing, homi project, Kimpraswil, Government of Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudallah D, Winarso H, Woltjer J (2007) Peri-urbanisation in East Asia: a new challenge for planning? Int Dev Plann Rev 29(4):503–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JICA and National Development Planning Agency (BAPPENAS) 2001 The study on integrated transportation master plan (SITRAMP) for the Jabodetabek phase 1. Final report. PCI and ALMEC Corporation, Jakarta, Republic of Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • JICA and National Development Planning Agency (BAPPENAS) 2004 The study on integrated transportation master plan (SITRAMP) for the Jabodetabek phase 2. Final report. Technical report. PCI and ALMEC Corporation, Jakarta, Republic of Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RJ (1984) Marxist political economy, the state, and political geography. Progr Hum Geogr 8:473–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox P (1989) Urban social geography: an introduction, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific & Technical, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusno A (2000) Behind the postcolonial: architecture, urban space and political cultures in Indonesia. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusno A (2004) Whiter nationalist urbanism? Public life in governor Sutiyoso’s Jakarta. Urban Stud 41(12):2377–2394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf M (1993) Land rights for residential development in Jakarta, Indonesia: the colonial roots of contemporary urban dualism. Int J Urban Reg Res 17(4):477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf M (1996) Building the road for the BMW: culture, vision, and extended metropolitan of Jakarta. Environ Plann A 28:1617–1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisch H (2002) Gated community in Indonesia. Cities 19(5):341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcussen L (1990) Third world housing in social and spatial development: the case of Jakarta. Avebury, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly M (1999) Institutional structures and processes for environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface. In: Strategic environmental planning and management for the peri-urban interface. University College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertokusumo W (2006) Urban heritage conservation and “the modern project”: critical notions on urban conservation and heritage management. Paper presented the 6th international conference: our modern re appropriating Asia’s urban heritage, Tokyo, Japan, 1–5 November 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Properti Indonesia (1994) Menjual Superblok Dengan Kepercayaan (Selling Superblock with Trust), pp 16−17

    Google Scholar 

  • Properti Indonesia (1994) “Bekasi dan Tangerang Akan Jadi Incaran Utama” (Bekasi and Tangerang Will be the First Choice), p 101

    Google Scholar 

  • Properti Indonesia (2004) Legenda Midas A la Sinar Mas (Midas Legend A la Sinar Mas), p 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari MK, Winarso H (2007) Transformasi Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Peri-Urban di Sekitar Pengembangan Lahan Skala Besar: Kasus Bumi Serpong Damai. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota 18(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab WA (1992) The sociology of cities. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver C (2008) Planning the megacity: Jakarta in the twentieth century. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanungkalit P (2002) Prospek Pasar Perumahan Nasional dan Bisinis Properti Jabotabek Tahun 2002 (The Prospect of National Housing Market and Property Bisnis in Jabotabek). Jurnal Properti Indonesia VIII

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinar Harapan (2003) Properti di Kelapa Gading Tak Kenal Krisis. Harga Melonjak Ditopang Lingkungan Tertata Baik

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivaramakrisnan KC, Green L (eds) (1986) Metropolitan management: the Asian experience. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Surjomihardjo A (1977) The growth of Jakarta. Djambatan, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JC (1968) Housing priorities settlements pattern and urban development in modernising countries. AIP J

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheim, W.F. (1956) Indonesian Society in Transition, A Study of Social Change. W van Hoeve, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams K, Burton E, Jenks M (eds) (2000) Achieving sustainable urban form. E & FN Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Winarso H (1999) Private residential developers and spatial structure of Jabotabek. In: Chapman P, Dutt AK, Bradnock RW (eds) Urban growth and development in Asia. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Winarso H (2002) Access to main roads or low cost land? Residential land developers’ behaviour in Indonesia. Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde. J Humanit Soc Sci Southeast Asia Oceania 158(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winarso H (2005) City for the rich. Paper presented at APSA 8th international conference, Penang

    Google Scholar 

  • Winarso H (2007) Large scale land development and the peri-urban transformation of Jakarta Metropolitan area: The case of tangerang regency. Paper presented at the international conference on New concepts and Approaches for Urban and Regional Policy and Planning. Leuven, 2–3 April 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Winarso H, Firman T (2002) Residential land development in Jabotabek, Indonesia: triggering economic crisis? Habitat Int 26:487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winarso H, Hudallah D (eds) (2006) Metropolitan in Indonesia, fact and challenges for spatial planning. Directorate General for Spatial Planning, Ministry of Public Works, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Winarso H, Kombaitan B (2001) The large scale land development process in Indonesia: the case of Jabotabek. Paper presented at the World Planning School Congress, Shanghai, 11−15 July 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Winarso H, Saptono Y (2008) Large scale land development and spatial segregation in Jakarta peri-urban areas: the case of land development in and around BSD. Paper presented at the Asia and Pacific metropolitan development forum, held by the China executive leadership academy Pudong (CELAP), 2–3 November 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Winarso H, Argo TA, Pangaribuan I, Prima M (2001) Energy, poverty and sustainable livelihood: the case study of Jakarta, Indonesia. Research report for DPU-DFID

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters JA (1991) Structural power and investor mobility: capital control and state policy in Indonesia, 1965−1990. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Rina Priyani, Yudi Saptono, Maulen Khairina Sari, Ardy Maulidy Navastara, and Ivan Kurniadi, all research associate at the Urban Planning and Design Research Group, for their help in preparing data for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haryo Winarso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winarso, H. (2011). Urban Dualism in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area. In: Sorensen, A., Okata, J. (eds) Megacities. Library for Sustainable Urban Regeneration, vol 10. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99267-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics