Skip to main content

Landscape Design and Ecological Management Process of Fishway and Surroundings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Biodiversity and Ecological Design for Sustainable Cities

Abstract

Ecosystem Services (ES) are the ecological characteristics, functions, or processes that directly or indirectly contribute to human well-being. Green Infrastructure (GI) is characterized by its multiple benefits. In Japan, GI is defined as infrastructure and land use planning which enhances regional and national sustainability. The ecological functions and use by people in the study site were limited. Consequently, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism (MLIT) asked the Laboratory of Environmental Design at Kyushu Institute of Technology (KIT), to design a new river bank. This project started in 2008, and the restoration plan was developed in cooperation together with local residents. We also considered how to implement GI in local community and could provide ecosystem services for local residents. In the 1960s, the river was a familiar environment for people. Children who lived close to the river had the opportunity to learn about nature from the river; however, the present river bank covered in concrete does not provide natural experiences for children. Preserving areas such as wildlife habitats and spaces where children can play is a crucial issue nowadays. The planning site had the potential to be a place for children to learn local ecology. Therefore, we designed the riverbank fishway not only for nature restoration but also as a place for children’s ecological learning. This chapter demonstrates the process of GI construction on the river Onga estuary in Japan to contribute to regional biodiversity conservation and provide ecological learning for children. It also should be noted that the purpose of urban landscape design or planning is to connect nature and people’s daily lives. In other words, an integrated approach in terms of “nature rehabilitation” and “lifescape” will be essential to create vernacular (i.e., domestic and functional) places in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agostinho CS, Pelicice FM, Marques EE, Soares AB, de Almeida DA (2011) All that goes up must come down? Absence of downstream passage through a fish ladder in a large Amazonian river. Hydrobiologia 675:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa S, Fujii H (1999) Seimei-no-kenchiku (Life architecture). Suiseisha, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict AM, MacMahon TE (2006) Green infrastructure; linking landscape and communities. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bixler RD, Floyd MF, Hammitt WE (2002) Environmental socialization quantitative tests of the childhood play hypothesis. Environ Behav 34:795–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth J, Anderson RA, Kumar P, Hunt WF, Chimbwandira JS, Moore LCT (2018) The interrelationship of green infrastructure and natural capital. Land Use Policy 75:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot R, Faber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill VR, Paruelo J, Raskin GR, Sutton P, Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fjørtoft I, Sageie J (2000) The natural environment as a playground for children: landscape description and analyses of a natural playscape. Landsc Urban Plan 48:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Infrastructure Association (2017) Green infrastructure. Nikkei, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug E, Torsheim T, Sallis JF, Samdal O (2010) The characteristics of the outdoor school environment associated with physical activity. Health Educ Res 25:248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heft H, Chawla L (2006) Children as agents in sustainable development: the ecology of competence. In: Spencer C, Blades M (eds) Children and their environments: learning, using, and designing spaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 199–216

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herrington S, Studtman K (1998) Landscape interventions: new directions for the design of children’s outdoor play environments. Landsc Urban Plan 42:191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito K, Fjørtoft I, Manabe T, Masuda K, Kamada M, Fujiwara K (2010) Landscape design and children’s participation in a Japanese primary school: planning process of school biotope for 5 years. Willey-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 441–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito K, Sudo I, Fjørtoft I (2016) Ecological design: collaborative landscape design with school children. In: Murnaghan A, Shillington L (eds) Children, nature, cities. Routledge, New York, pp 195–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito K, Sudo T, Hasegawa H, Ishimatsu K, Shiote K, Mitsuhashi S, Ono Y, Fukaura T, Shimada T, Izumi D and Toyokuni N (2020) The process of constructing the fishway of Onga river as Green Infrastructure, Landscape ecology and Management, Vol. 25, 2-5 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB, Fuller RA, Bush R, Gaston KJ, Shanahan DF (2014) Opportunity or orientation? Who uses urban parks and why. PLoS ONE 9(1):e87422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney RA, Raposa KB, Martin RM (Cournoyer) (2011) Wetlands as habitat in urbanizing landscapes: patterns of bird abundance and occupancy. Landsc Urban Plan 100(1):144–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2015) National Spatial Strategies. http://www.milt.go.jp/common/001100233.pdf

  • Mitchell MGE, Suarez-Castro AF, Martinez-Harms M, Maron M, McAlpine C, Gaston KJ, Johansen K, Rhodes JR (2015) Reframing landscape fragmentation’s effects on ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol 30(4):190–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura F (2004) Nature restoration: analyses at regional, catchment and local site scale and how to realize the concept of nature rehabilitation. J Jpn Soc Reveget Technol 30(2):391–393 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (2012) Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design. Landsc Urban Plan 106:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Numata M (1996) Keisoseitaigaku: introduction of landscape ecology. Asakura Shoten, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovidio M, Philippart JC (2002) The impact of small physical obstacles on upstream movements of six species of fish. Hydrobiologia 483:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawer-Jost C, Kappus B, Böhmer J, Jansen W, Rahmann H (1999) Upstream movements of benthic macroinvertebrates in two different types of fishways in southwestern Germany. Hydrobiologia 391:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (2003) Win-win ecology; how the earth’s species can survive in the midst of human enterprise. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJR, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B, Hergenroeder AC, Must A, Nixon PA, Pivarnik JM, Rowland T, Trost S, Trudeau F (2005) Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr 146:732–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudo T, Shwe YL, Hasegawa H, Ito K, Yamashita T, Yamashita I (2021) Nature environment and management for children’s play and learning in kindergarten in urban forest, Kyoto, Japan. In: Ito K (ed) Urban biodiversity and ecological design for sustainable cities. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Suebvises P (2018) Social capital, citizen participation in public administration, and public sector performance in Thailand. World Dev 109:236–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis, a report of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Town and Country Planning Association (2012) Planning for a Healthy Environment Good Practice Guidance for Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity

    Google Scholar 

  • Washitani I (2001) Plant conservation ecology for management and restoration of riparian habitats of lowland Japan. Popul Ecol 43:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshii C, Yamaura Y, Soga M, Shibuya M, Nakamura F (2015) Comparable benefits of land sparing and sharing indicated by bird responses to stand-level plantation intensity in Hokkaido, northern Japan. J For Res 20:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimura C, Omura T, Furumai H, Tockner K (2005) Present state of rivers and streams in Japan. River Res Appl 21:93–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our gratitude to all those who made the writing of this paper possible. We would like to appreciate the cooperation and support of all staff members of MLIT, Ashiya-town, and the construction consultancy companies who have been involved in this project. We are greatly indebted to Prof. Ian. Ruxton about discussion on historical point of view and english expressions. We would like to show our appreciation to Dr. Yuichi Ono, Dr. Mahito Kamada and Dr. Tohru Manabe about discussions from earlier stage of this project. We also thank to Takuya Ito, Yuji Shin, Kosuke Ide, Yuta Tanaka, Masayoshi Yamamoto, Naruki Baba, Natsuko Ayukawa and all students in Keitaro Ito’s laboratory in Kyushu Institute of Technology, and the children, the teachers, and parents of the Ashiya-Higashi Primary School. This study was supported by Kakenhi, Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (No. 23601013) in 2011–2013, and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (No. 15H02870) in 2015–2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keitaro Ito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ito, K., Sudo, T., Ishimatsu, K., Hasegawa, H. (2021). Landscape Design and Ecological Management Process of Fishway and Surroundings. In: Ito, K. (eds) Urban Biodiversity and Ecological Design for Sustainable Cities. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56856-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics