Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Statistics ((JSSRES))

  • 675 Accesses

Abstract

The primary objective of early-phase (phase I, or phase I/II) clinical trials of a given anticancer agent is to determine its optimal dose (OD) to be administered to a cancer patient, so as to obtain the highest efficacy while maintaining admissible toxicity. Thus, in oncology, early-phase trials for anticancer agents are also called “dose-finding” trials. For a chemotherapeutic or cytotoxic agent, classically, the OD is determined in the phase I trial, in which toxicity alone is primarily evaluated. Here, the highest tested safe dose with tolerable toxicity, called the “maximum tolerated dose (MTD),” is determined. This approach is adopted because monotonic increases in both toxicity and efficacy with increasing dose are assumed; thus, the MTD corresponds to the recommended phase II dose, and is also expected to yield the highest efficacy among the tested doses. However, this reasoning may not hold for molecularly targeted or cytostatic agents, or for immunotherapeutic agents (IAs). The ODs of such agents are found in phase I/II trials, in which both toxicity and efficacy are evaluated to determine the dose that yields the highest efficacy and admissible toxicity, or the dose that also yields the required immune response (particularly for IAs). This distinction exists because the efficacy does not always monotonically increase with a higher dose, even if the toxicity increases in this manner. In this chapter, we overview the clinical research and development process of anticancer drugs, describe the basic concepts of early-phase trials, and outline various dose-finding designs for early-phase trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berry, S.M., Carlin, B.P., Lee, J.J., Müller, P.: Chapter 3. Phase I studies. In: Berry, S.M., Carlin, B.P., Lee, J.J., Müller, P. (eds.) Bayesian Adaptive Methods for Clinical Trials, First Edition, pp. 87–135. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T.M., Alonzo, T.A.: Beyond the 3+3 method: expanded algorithms for dose-escalation in phase I oncology trials of two agents. Clin. Trials 8(3), 247–259 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M.: Adaptive Design Theory and Implementation Using SAS and R, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2008a)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M.: Classical and Adaptive Clinical Trial Designs Using ExpDesign Studio, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ (2008b)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y.K.: Coherence principles in dose-finding studies. Biometrika 92(4), 863–873 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chevret, S.: Statistical Methods for Dose-Finding Experiments, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, S.-C., Chang, M.: Adaptive Design Methods in Clinical Trials, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2011a)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, S.-C., Chang, M.: Chapter 5. Adaptive dose-escalation trials. In: Chow, S.-C., Chang, M. (eds.) Adaptive Design Methods in Clinical Trials, Second Edition, pp. 89–104. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2011b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., de Moor, C., Amato, R.J.: The association between treatment-specific optimism and depressive symptomatology in patients enrolled in a phase I cancer clinical trial. Cancer 91(10), 1949–1955 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couzin-Frankel, J.: Cancer immunotherapy. Science 324(6165), 1432–1433 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, J., Hoering, A.: Handbook of Statistics in Clinical Oncology, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, C., Ratain, M.J., Grochowski, E., Stocking, C., Kodish, E., Mick, R., Siegler, M.: Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 13(5), 1062–1072 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edler, L., Burkholder, I.: Chapter 1. Overview of phase I trials. In: Crowley, J., Ankerst, D.P. (eds.) Handbook of Statistics in Clinical Oncology, Second Edition, pp. 1–29. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhauer, E.A., O’Dwyer, P.J., Christian, M., Humphrey, J.S.: Phase I clinical trial design in cancer drug development. J. Clin. Oncol. 18(3), 684–692 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., Benedetti, J., Crowley, J.: Clinical Trials in Oncology, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirakawa, A., Sato, H., Daimon, T., Matsui, S.: Modern Dose-Finding Designs for Cancer Phase I Trials: Drug Combinations and Molecularly Targeted Agents. Springer, Tokyo (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, E., McCabe, M.S., Grochow, L., Yamamoto, S., Rubinstein, L., Budd, T., Shoemaker, D., Emanuel, E.J., Grady, C.: Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002. N. Engl. J. Med. 352(9), 895–904. Correspondence: phase 1 clinical trials oncology. N. Engl. J. Med. 352(23), 2451–2453 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, F., Rosenberger, W.F.: The Theory of Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, A.: Dose-finding in oncology-nonparametric methods. In: Ting, N. (ed.) Dose Finding in Drug Development, 1st edn, pp. 49–58. Springer, New York, NY (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzrock, R., Benjamin, R.S.: Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, revisited. N. Engl. J. Med. 352(9), 930–932 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y., Shih, W.J.: Statistical properties of the traditional algorithm-based designs for phase I cancer clinical trials. Biostatistics 2(2), 203–215 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, K.M., Yuraszeck, T.M., Li, C.-C., Zhang, Y., Kasichayanula, S.: Immunotherapy and novel combinations in oncology: current landscape, challenges, and opportunities. Clin. Transl. Sci. 9(2), 89–104 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Quigley, J., Chevret, S.: Methods for dose finding studies in cancer clinical trials: a review. Statist. Med. 10(11), 1647–1664 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Quigley, J., Iasonos, A., Bornkamp, B.: Handbook of Methods for Designing, Monitoring, and Analyzing Dose-Finding Trials, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Quigley, J., Pepe, M., Fisher, L.: Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics 46(1), 33–48 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • O’Quigley, J., Zohar, S.: Experimental designs for phase I and phase I/II dose-finding studies. Br. J. Cancer 94(5), 609–613 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, X., Baron, B., Schöffski, P., Fumoleau, P., Lacombe, D., Marreaud, S., Sylvester, R.: Using the continual reassessment method: lessons learned from an EORTC phase I dose finding study. Eur. J. Cancer 42(10), 1362–1368 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, X., Le Tourneau, C., Verweij, J., Siu, L.L., Seymour, L., Postel-Vinay, S., Collette, L., Rizzo, E., Ivy, P., Olmos, D., Massard, C., Lacombe, D., Kaye, S.B., Soria, J.C.: Defining dose-limiting toxicity for phase 1 trials of molecularly targeted agents: results of a DLT-TARGETT international survey. Eur. J. Cancer 50(12), 2050–2056 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pong, A., Chow, S.-C.: Handbook of Adaptive Designs in Pharmaceutical and Clinical Development. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Postel-Vinay, S., Aspeslagh, S., Lanoy, E., Robert, C., Soria, J.C., Marabelle, A.: Challenges of phase 1 clinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint-targeted antibodies. Ann. Oncol. 27(2), 214–224 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, D.M.: Phase I studies of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer patients: a review of the designs. J. Biopharm. Stat. 16(5), 579–604 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger, W.F., Haines, L.M.: Competing designs for phase I clinical trials: a review. Statist. Med. 21(18), 2757–2770 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storer, B.E.: Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials. Biometrics 45(3), 925–937 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tighiouart, M., Rogatko, A.: Dose-finding in Oncology-Parametric Methods. In: Ting, N. (ed.) Dose Finding in Drug Development, 1st edn, pp. 59–72. Springer, New York, NY (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ting, N.: Dose Finding in Drug Development. Springer, New York, NY (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tomamichel, M., Jaime, H., Degrate, A., de Jong, J., Pagani, O., Cavalli, F., Sessa, C.: Proposing phase I studies: patients’, relatives’, nurses’ and specialists’ perceptions. Ann. Oncol. 11(3), 289–294 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Rosner, G.L., Roden, R.B.S.: A Bayesian design for phase I cancer therapeutic vaccine trials. Stat. Med. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, F., Thall, P.F., Lu, K.H., Gilbert, M.R., Yuan, Y.: Phase I-II clinical trial design: a state-of-the-art paradigm for dose finding. Ann. Oncol. 29(3), 694–699 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, G.: Clinical Trial Design: Bayesian and Frequentist Adaptive Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y., Nguyen, H., Thall, P.: Bayesian Designs for Phase I-II Clinical Trials. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H., Yuan, Y., Nie, L.: Accuracy, safety, and reliability of novel phase I trial designs. Clin. Cancer. Res. (2018a). https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H., Murray, T.A., Pan, H., Yuan, Y.: Comparative review of novel model-assisted designs for phase I clinical trials. Statist. Med. 37(14), 2208–2222 (2018b)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Daimon .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Japan KK

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Daimon, T., Hirakawa, A., Matsui, S. (2019). Early-Phase Cancer Clinical Trials. In: Dose-Finding Designs for Early-Phase Cancer Clinical Trials. SpringerBriefs in Statistics(). Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55585-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics