Abstract
‘Learning’ is a process by which an individual gains new information. In the case of ‘social learning’, this process occurs because at least one individual has undertaken an activity that results in another individual learning something new. For an individual, therefore, ‘learning’ is an active process that takes place in vivo. For those faced with the challenge of studying learning in the Palaeolithic, however, all we are left with are inert objects (e.g., stone artefacts). Yet, understanding social learning during the Palaeolithic is a fundamental step toward understanding matters of our cultural evolution. Evolutionary biology, faced with similar problems, has made substantial progress in understanding matters of transmission, the effects of transmission on phenotypic variation, rates of mutation, etc. via the use of laboratory experiments, especially through the use of so-called ‘model organisms’. Here, we describe two experiments that use handaxe form in the manner of a ‘model organism’ in order to understand the effects of copying error. We go on to discuss why understanding these micro-evolutionary effects can ultimately lead to a greater understanding of learning dynamics in handaxe-making hominin populations. These experiments illustrate that the characteristic size and shape parameters of handaxe traditions will have been inherently unstable. In the case of shape, in particular, this suggests that a learning mechanism other than pure observation of others’ artefacts was used. Individual (trial-and-error) learning could conceivably constrain variation somewhat, but costs associated with knapping would encourage the adoption of social learning mechanisms that would countermand the inevitable effects of copying error with reduced risk to tool manufacturers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashburner M, Novitski E (1976) The genetics and biology of drosophila 1A. Academic, London
Ashburner M, Golic K, Hawley RS (2005) Drosophila: a laboratory handbook, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York
Bataillon T, Joyce P, Sniegowski P (2013) As it happens: current directions in experimental evolution. Biol Lett 9:20120945
Baumler MF (1995) Principles and properties of lithic core reduction: implications for levallois technology. In: Dibble HL, Bar-Yosef O (eds) The definition and interpretation of levallois technology. Prehistory Press, Madison, pp 11–23
Bello SM, Parfitt SA, Stringer C (2009) Quantitative micromorphological analyses of cut marks produced by ancient and modern handaxes. J Archaeol Sci 36:1869–1880
Beyene Y, Katoh S, WoldeGabriel G, Hart WK, Uto K, Sudo M et al (2013) The characteristics and chronology of the earliest Acheulean at konso, Ethiopia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:1584–1591
Binford LR (1983) In pursuit of the past. Thames & Hudson, London
Biro B, Carvalho S, Matsuzawa T (2010) Tools, traditions, and technologies: interdisciplinary approaches to chimpanzee nutcracking. In: Lonsdorf EV, Ross SR, Matsuzawa T (eds) The mind of the chimpanzee: ecological and experimental perspectives. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 141–155
Bookstein FL (1989) ‘Size and shape’: a comment on semantics. Syst Zool 38:173–180
Boyd R, Richerson P (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Byrne RW, Russon AE (1998) Learning by imitation: a hierarchical approach. Behav Brain Sci 21:667–721
Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1995) Chemical recognition of risky habitats is culturally transmitted among fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas (osteichthyes, cyprinidae). Ethol 99:286–296
Clark JD (1994) The Acheulian industrial complex in Africa and elsewhere. In: Corruccini RS, Ciochon RL (eds) Integrative paths to the past. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 451–469
Clarke DL (1968) Analytical archaeology. Methuen, London
Coren S, Ward LM, Enns JT (1994) Sensation and perception. Harcourt Brace, San Diego
Costa AG (2010) A geometric morphometric assessment of plan shape in bone and stone Acheulean bifaces from the middle Pleistocene site of Castel di Guido, Latium, Italy. In: Lycett SJ, Chauhan PR (eds) New perspectives on old stones: analytical approaches to paleolithic technologies. Springer, New York, pp 23–41
Crompton RH, Gowlett JAJ (1993) Allometry and multidimensional form in Acheulean bifaces from kilombe, Kenya. J Hum Evol 25:175–199
Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species. John Murray, London
Deetz J (1967) Invitation to archaeology. The Natural History Press, Garden City
Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Serralllonga J, Juan-Tresserras J, Alcala L, Luque L (2001) Woodworking activities by early humans: a plant residue analysis on Acheulian stone tools from Peninj (Tanzania). J Hum Evol 40:289–299
Edwards SW (2001) A modern knapper’s assessment of the technical skills of the late Acheulean biface workers at Kalambo falls. In: Clark JD (ed) Kalambo falls prehistoric site: volume III. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 605–611
Eerkens JW (2000) Practice makes within 5 % of perfect: visual perception, motor skills, and memory in artifact variation. Curr Anthropol 41:663–668
Eerkens JW, Bettinger RL (2001) Techniques for assessing standardization in artifact assemblages: can we scale variability? Am Antiq 66:493–504
Eerkens JW, Lipo CP (2005) Cultural transmission, copying errors, and the generation of variation in material culture and the archaeological record. J Anthropol Archaeol 24:316–334
Eren MI, Roos CI, Story B, von Cramon-Taubadel N, Lycett SJ (2014) The role of raw material differences in stone tool shape variation: an experimental assessment. J Archaeol Sci 49:472–487
Feldman MW, Aoki K, Kumm J (1996) Individual versus social learning: evolutionary analysis in a fluctuating environment. Anthropol Sci 104:209–232
Fragaszy DM, Biro D, Eshchar Y, Humle T, Izar P, Resende B, Visalberghi E (2013) The fourth dimension of tool use: temporally enduring artefacts aid primates learning to use tools. Philos Trans R Soc B 368:20120410
Gowlett JAJ (2006) The elements of design form in Acheulian bifaces: modes, modalities, rules and language. In: Goren-Inbar N, Sharon G (eds) Axe age: Acheulian tool-making from quarry to discard. Equinox, London, pp 203–221
Gowlett JAJ (2009) Artefacts of apes, humans, and others: towards comparative assessment and analysis. J Hum Evol 57:401–410
Gowlett JAJ (2010) The future of lithic analysis in palaeolithic archaeology: a view from the Old World. In: Lycett SJ, Chauhan PR (eds) New perspectives on old stones: analytical approaches to paleolithic technologies. Springer, New York, pp 295–309
Gowlett JAJ (2011) The empire of the Acheulean strikes back. In: Sept J, Pilbeam D (eds) Casting the net wide: papers in honor of Glynn Isaac and his approach to human origins research. American School of Prehistoric Research, Cambridge, MA, pp 93–114
Greenspan RJ (2004) Fly pushing: the theory and practice of drosophila genetics, 2nd edn. Cold Springer Harbor Laboratory Press, New York
Hamilton MJ, Buchanan B (2009) The accumulation of stochastic copying errors causes drift in culturally transmitted technologies: quantifying Clovis evolutionary dynamics. J Anthropol Archaeol 2:55–69
Hampton OW (1999) Culture of stone: sacred and profane uses of stone among the Dani. Texas A&M, College Station
Harrison HS (1930) Opportunism and the factors of invention. Am Anthropol 32:106–125
Henrich J, McElreath R (2003) The evolution of cultural evolution. Evol Anthropol 12:123–135
Heyes CM (1994) Social learning in animals: categories and mechanisms. Biol Rev 69:207–231
Horner V, de Waal FBM (2009) Controlled studies of chimpanzee cultural transmission. Prog Brain Res 178:3–15
Humle T, Snowdon CT, Matsuzawa T (2009) Social influences on ant-dipping acquisition in the wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) of bossou, guinea, West Africa. Anim Cogn 12(S1):37–48
Isaac GL (1972) Early phases of human behaviour: models in lower palaeolithic archaeology. In: Clarke DL (ed) Models in archaeology. Methuen, London, pp 167–199
Isaac GL (1977) Olorgesailie: archaeological studies of a middle Pleistocene lake basin in Kenya. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Johnson LL (1978) A history of flint-knapping experimentation, 1838–1976. Curr Anthropol 19:337–372
Jones PR (1980) Experimental butchery with modern stone tools and its relevance for palaeolithic archaeology. World Archaeol 12:153–165
Jungers WL, Falsetti AB, Wall CE (1995) Shape, relative size, and size adjustments in morphometrics. Yearb Phys Anthropol 38:137–161
Keeley LH (1980) Experimental determination of stone tool uses: a microwear analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kelley JL, Evans JP, Ramnarine IW, Magurran AE (2003) Back to school: can antipredator behaviour in guppies be enhanced through social learning? Anim Behav 65:655–662
Kempe M, Mesoudi A (2014) An experimental demonstration of the effect of group size on cultural accumulation. Evol Hum Behav 35:285–290
Kempe M, Lycett SJ, Mesoudi A (2012) An experimental test of the accumulated copying error model of cultural mutation for Acheulean handaxe size. PLoS One 7(11):e48333
Kroeber T (1961) Ishi in two worlds. University of California Press, Berkeley
Lepre CJ, Roche H, Kent DV, Harmand S, Quinn RL, Brugal J-P et al (2011) An earlier origin for the Acheulian. Nature 477:82–85
Lonsdorf EV, Eberly LE, Pusey AE (2004) Sex differences in learning in chimpanzees. Nature 428:715–716
Lycett SJ (2008) Acheulean variation and selection: does handaxe symmetry fit neutral expectations? J Archaeol Sci 35:2640–2648
Lycett SJ, Chauhan PR (2010) Analytical approaches to palaeolithic technologies: an introduction. In: Lycett SJ, Chauhan PR (eds) New perspectives on old stones: analytical approaches to palaeolithic technologies. Springer, New York, pp 1–22
Lycett SJ, Gowlett JAJ (2008) On questions surrounding the Acheulean ‘tradition’. World Archaeol 40:295–315
Lycett SJ, von Cramon-Taubadel N (2015) Toward a “quantitative genetic” approach to lithic variation. J Archaeol Method Theory. doi: 10.1007/s10816-013-9200-9
Lycett SJ, von Cramon-Taubadel N, Foley RA (2006) A crossbeam co-ordinate caliper for the morphometric analysis of lithic nuclei: a description, test and empirical examples of application. J Archaeol Sci 33:847–861
Marshall G, Gamble C, Roe D (2003) The Acheulian biface project: a digital archive for teaching and research. Antiquity 77 (online)
Mesoudi A (2008) Foresight in cultural evolution. Biol Philos 23:243–255
Mesoudi A (2011) Cultural evolution: how Darwinian theory can explain culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Mesoudi A, O’Brien MJ (2008) The cultural transmission of great basin projectile point technology I: an experimental simulation. Am Antiq 73:3–28
Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN (2004) Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? evidence reviewed from the perspective of The origin of species. Evolution 58:1–11
Mineka S, Cook M (1988) Social learning and the acquisition of snake fear in monkeys. In: Galef BG, Zentall TR (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 51–73
Mithen S (1999) Imitation and cultural change: a view from the stone age, with specific reference to the manufacture of handaxes. In: Box HO, Gibson KR (eds) Mammalian social learning: comparative and ecological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 389–399
Nishiaki Y (2013) ‘Gifting’ as a means of cultural transmission. In: Akazawa T, Nishiaki Y, Aoki K (eds) Dynamics of learning in Neanderthals and Modern Humans, vol 1. Springer, Tokyo, pp 173–185
O’Brien MJ, Lyman RL (2000) Applying evolutionary archaeology: a systematic approach. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York
Patten B (2005) Peoples of the flute: a study in anthropolithic forensics. Stone Dagger Publications, Denver
Pope ST (1918) Yahi archery. University of California Press, Berkeley
Ridley M (2004) Evolution, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford
Roberts MB, Parfitt S (eds) (1999) Boxgrove: a middle Pleistocene hominid site at eartham quarry, boxgrove, West Sussex. English Heritage, London
Roche H (2005) From simple flaking to shaping: stone-knapping evolution among early hominins. In: Roux V, Bril B (eds) Stone knapping: the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behaviour. McDonald Institute, Cambridge, pp 35–48
Roe D (1976) Typology and the trouble with handaxes. In: Sieveking G de G, Longworth IH, Wilson KE (eds) Problems in economic and social archaeology. Duckworth, London, pp 61–70
Rohlf FR (2010) TpsDig2 v2.16. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook. http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/
Schick KD, Toth N (1993) Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of human technology. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London
Schillinger K, Mesoudi A, Lycett SJ (2014) Copying error and the cultural evolution of “additive” versus “reductive” material traditions: an experimental assessment. Am Antiq 79:128–143
Sharon G (2008) The impact of raw material on Acheulian large flake production. J Archaeol Sci 35:1329–1344
Sharon G (2009) Acheulian giant-core technology. Curr Anthropol 50:335–367
Shennan S (2011) Descent with modification and the archaeological record. Philos Trans R Soc B 366:1070–1079
Simão J (2002) Tools evolve: the artificial selection and evolution of paleolithic stone tools. Behav Brain Sci 25:419
Simpson GG (1953) The major features of evolution. Columbia University Press, New York
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York
Stout D (2005) The social and cultural context of stone knapping skill acquisition. In: Roux V, Bril B (eds) Stone knapping: the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behaviour. McDonald Institute, Cambridge, pp 331–340
Tehrani JJ, Riede F (2008) Towards an archaeology of pedagogy: learning, teaching and the generation of material culture traditions. World Archaeol 40(3):316–331
Toth N (1985) The Oldowan reassessed: a close look at early stone artefacts. J Archaeol Sci 12:101–120
Whiten A, Mesoudi A (2008) Establishing an experimental science of culture: animal social diffusion experiments. Philos Trans R Soc B 363:3477–3488
Whiten A, Horner V, Litchfield CA, Marshall-Pescini S (2004) How do apes ape? Learn Behav 32:36–52
Whittaker JC (1994) Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. University of Texas Press, Austin
Winter-Livneh R, Svoray T, Gilead I (2013) Shape reproducibility and architectural symmetry during the chalcolithic period in the southern Levant. J Archaeol Sci 40:1340–1353
Wynn T (1995) Handaxe enigmas. World Archaeol 27:10–24
Wynn T, Tierson F (1990) Regional comparison of the shapes of later Acheulean handaxes. Am Anthropol 92:73–84
Wynn TG, Tierson FD, Palmer CT (1996) Evolution of sex differences in spatial cognition. Yearb Phys Anthropol 39:11–42
Yravedra J, Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Santonja M, Pérez-González A, Panera J, Rubio-Jara S et al (2010) Cut marks on the middle pleistocene elephant carcass of Áridos 2 (Madrid, Spain). J Archaeol Sci 37:2469–2476
Acknowledgements
The research discussed in this chapter was funded by a Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant (F/07 476/AR) awarded to AM and SJL. For numerous invaluable conversations and comments while undertaking this work we are grateful to Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel. We are also grateful to Ken Aoki and Jamie Tehrani for helpful comments on a previous version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lycett, S.J., Schillinger, K., Kempe, M., Mesoudi, A. (2015). Learning in the Acheulean: Experimental Insights Using Handaxe Form as a ‘Model Organism’. In: Mesoudi, A., Aoki, K. (eds) Learning Strategies and Cultural Evolution during the Palaeolithic. Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55363-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55363-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55362-5
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55363-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)