Abstract
A new type of scholarship about evidence in litigation first surfaced about thirty years ago1 By the mid-1980s, this new species of evidence scholarship — the “New Evidence Scholarship”2 (“NES”) — had grown substantially; by then it had become a major international movement. Today, NES is a mature field of scholarship — so much so that the label “new” may now be a misnomer.
I regret that I cannot possibly thank all of the people whose contributions made possible the publication of the papers found in this book. But I must single out several people who made extraordinary contributions: Marilyn MacCrimmon, Craig Callen, Craig J. Brody, and Michael Parrish. I am indebted to the Jacob Burns Institute for Advanced Studies for its financial support of the conference at Cardozo on April 30, 2000.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tillers, P. (2002). Making Sense of the Process of Proof in Litigation. In: MacCrimmon, M., Tillers, P. (eds) The Dynamics of Judicial Proof. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 94. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_1
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-00323-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1792-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive