Abstract
Background: Hypotension is a recognized secondary insult after traumatic brain injury (TBI). There are many definitions of hypotension, an often cited example being the Brain Trauma Foundation’s current (2007) “Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury,” which defines hypotension as systolic pressure <90 mmHg. However, this same document declares “The importance of mean arterial pressure, as opposed to systolic pressure should also be stressed, ….” Our work shows that when using the Edinburgh University Secondary Insult Grades (EUSIG) definitions, which require monitoring of both systolic and mean arterial pressures, that most hypotensive events are in fact triggered by a breach of the mean arterial level of 70 mmHg. We suggest that close monitoring of mean arterial pressure would enable clinical teams to avoid more potentially damaging hypotensive events.
Materials and Methods: An analysis of 100 patients from the Brain-IT database was performed. Using the EUSIG definitions, 2,081 events can be obtained by analyzing the systolic and mean blood pressures on a minute by minute basis. A software program was written to identify and classify the trigger pattern for each event. A categorical analysis of these triggering patterns has been carried out.
Key Results: Our analysis shows that most events are triggered by a drop in mean arterial pressure. In fact a large number of events (91%) occur where the mean arterial pressure is below the threshold limits whereas the systolic pressure does not cross the 90 mmHg limit at all.
Conclusion: We suggest that more emphasis should be placed on closely monitoring mean arterial pressure as well as systolic pressure when trying to guard against hypotensive problems in traumatically brain injured patients. In future work we will study the underlying physiological mechanisms and attempt to further classify concomitant conditions that may be contributing to the onset of a hypotensive event.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
AvertIT (2008) Avert-it project (FP7-217049-AVERT-IT). URL: http://www.avert-it.org/ Accessed on: 2010.09.01
Bijker JB, van Klei WA, Vergouwe Y, Eleveld DJ, van Wolfswinkel L, Moons KGM, Kalkman CJ (2009) Intraoperative hypotension and 1-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 111(6):1217–1226. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c14930
BrainIT Team (2007) BrainIT. URL: http://www.brainit.org/ Accessed on: 2007.12.22
Brain Trauma Foundation (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, 3rd edn. J Neurotrauma 1:1–117, URL: https://www.braintrauma.org/pdf/protected/Guidelines_Management_2007w_bookmarks.pdf Accessed on: 2008.09.28
Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, Blunt BA, Baldwin N, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA (1993) The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma 34(2):216–222
Donald R (2008) Event definition analysis, preliminary results. Tech rep, Avert-IT Project URL: http://www.avert-it.org Accessed on: 2010.09.01
Jones P, Andrews P, Midgley S, Piper I, Tocher J, Housley A, Corrie J, Slattery J, Dearden M, Miller D (1994) Measuring the burden of secondary insults in head-injured patients during intensive care. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 6:4–14
Marmarou A, Anderson R, Ward J et al (1991) Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma. J Neurosurg 75:S59–S66, URL: http://jnsonline.org/jns/issues/v75n5s/pdf/n0750059.pdf Accessed on: 2007.12.31
Miller J, Becker D (1982) Secondary insults to the injured brain. J R Coll Surg Edinb 27:292–298
Piper I, Chambers I, Citerio G, Enblad P, Gregson B, Howells T, Kiening K, Mattern J, Nilsson P, Ragauskas A, Sahuquillo J, Donald R, Sinnott R, Stell A (2010) The brain monitoring with information technology (BrainIT) collaborative network: EC feasibility study results and future direction. Acta Neurochir 152(11):1–13. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0719-1, doi:10.1007/s00701-010-0719-1 Accessed on: 2010.05.29
R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. URL: http://www.R-project.org, ISBN 3-900051-07-0 Accessed on: 2008.04.17
Signorini DF, Andrews PJD, Jones PA, Wardlaw JM, Miller JD (1999) Adding insult to injury: the prognostic value of early secondary insults for survival after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66:26–31, URL: http://jnnp.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/66/1/26 Accessed on: 2008.01.09
Signorini DF, Andrews PJD, Jones PA, Wardlaw JM, Miller JD (1999) Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66:20–25, URL: http://jnnp.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/66/1/20 Accessed on: 2008.01.09
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Donald, R. et al. (2012). Trigger Characteristics of EUSIG-Defined Hypotensive Events. In: Schuhmann, M., Czosnyka, M. (eds) Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XIV. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 114. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0955-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0956-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)