Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nanomechanical Properties of Nanostructures and Scale Effects

  • Chapter
Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology

Part of the book series: Springer Handbooks ((SHB))

  • 10k Accesses

Abstract

Structural integrity is of paramount importance in all devices. Load applied during the use of devices can result in component failure. Cracks can develop and propagate under tensile stresses, leading to failure. Knowledge of the mechanical properties of nanostructures is necessary for the design of realistic micro/nanoelectromechanical systems (GlossaryTerm

MEMS

/GlossaryTerm

NEMS

) and biological micro/nanoelectromechanical systems (GlossaryTerm

bioMEMS

/GlossaryTerm

bioNEMS

) devices. Elastic and inelastic properties are needed to predict deformation from an applied load in the elastic and inelastic regimes respectively. The strength property is needed to predict the allowable operating limit. Some properties of interest are hardness, elastic modulus, bending strength, fracture toughness, and fatigue strength. Many of the mechanical properties are scale dependent. Therefore, these should be measured at relevant scales. Atomic force microscopy and nanoindenters can be used to evaluate the mechanical properties of micro/nanoscale structures.

Commonly used materials in MEMS/NEMS are single-crystal silicon and silicon-based materials, e. g., SiO2 and polysilicon films deposited by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition. Single-crystal SiC deposited on large-area silicon substrates is used for high-temperature micro/nanosensors and actuators. Amorphous alloys can be formed on both metal and silicon substrates by sputtering and plating techniques, providing more flexibility in surface integration. Electroless deposited Ni-P amorphous thin films have been used to construct microdevices , especially using the so-called Lithographie, Galvanoformung, Abformung (GlossaryTerm

LIGA

) techniques. Micro/nanodevices need conductors to provide power, as well as electrical/magnetic signals to make them functional. Electroplated gold films have found wide application in electronic devices because of their ability to make thin films and because they process simply. Polymers, such as poly(methyl methacrylate) (GlossaryTerm

PMMA

), poly(dimethylsiloxane) (GlossaryTerm

PDMS

), and polystyrene are commonly used in BioMEMS/BioNEMS such as micro/nanofluidic devices because of the ease of manufacturing and reduced cost. Many polymers are biocompatible, so they may be integrated into biomedical devices.

This chapter presents a review of mechanical property measurements on the micro/nanoscale of various materials of interest and stress and deformation analyses of nanostructures .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. I. Fujimasa: Micromachines: A New Era in Mechanical Engineering (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. W.S. Trimmer (Ed.): Micromachines and MEMS, Classic and Seminal Papers to 1990 (IEEE Press, New York 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Bhushan: Tribology Issues and Opportunities in MEMS (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.T.A. Kovacs: Micromachined Transducers Sourcebook (WCB McGraw-Hill, Boston 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.D. Senturia: Microsystem Design (Kluwer, Boston 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Elwenspoek, R. Wiegerink: Mechanical Microsensors (Springer, Berlin 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Gad-el-Hak: The MEMS Handbook (CRC, Boca Raton 2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. T.R. Hsu: MEMS and Microsystems: Design and Manufacture (McGraw-Hill, Boston 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Hierlemann: Integrated Chemical Microsensor Systems in CMOS Technology (Springer, Berlin 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Madou: Fundamentals of Microfabrication and Nanotechnology, 3rd edn. (CRC, Boca Raton 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Bhushan: Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology, 2nd edn. (Springer International, Switzerland 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.E. Drexler: Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing and Computation (Wiley, New York 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Timp (Ed.): Nanotechnology (Springer, New York 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, P. Avouris: Carbon Nanotubes – Synthesis, Structure, Properties and Applications (Springer, Berlin 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. E.A. Rietman: Molecular Engineering of Nanosystems (Springer, New York 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. W.A. Goddard, D.W. Brenner, S.E. Lyshevski, G.J. Iafrate (Eds.): Handbook of Nanoscience, Engineering, and Technology (CRC, Boca Raton 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. H.S. Nalwa (Ed.): Nanostructures Materials and Nanotechnology (Academic, San Diego 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. C.P. Poole, F.J. Owens: Introduction to Nanotechnology (Wiley, Hoboken 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Manz, H. Becker (Eds.): Microsystem Technology in Chemistry and Life Sciences, Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 194 (Springer, Heidelberg 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Cheng, L.J. Kricka (Eds.): Biochip Technology (Harwood Academic, Philadelphia 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. M.J. Heller, A. Guttman (Eds.): Integrated Microfabricated Biodevices (Marcel Dekker, New York 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. C.L.P. San, E.P.H. Yap (Eds.): Frontiers in Human Genetics (World Scientific, Singapore 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. C.H. Mastrangelo, H. Becker (Eds.): Microfluidics and BioMEMS, Proc. SPIE, Vol. 4560, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Becker, L.E. Lacascio: Polymer microfluidic devices, Talanta 56, 267–287 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. D.J. Beebe, G.A. Mensing, G.M. Walker: Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 4, 261–286 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. van der Berg (Ed.): Lab-on-a-Chip: Chemistry in Miniaturized Synthesis and Analysis Systems (Elsevier, Amsterdam 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.V. Zoval, M.J. Madou: Centrifuge-based fluidic platforms, Proc. IEEE 92, 140–153 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Raiteri, M. Grattarola, H. Butt, P. Skladal: Micromechanical cantilever-based biosensors, Sens. Actuators B 79, 115–126 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. W.C. Tang, A.P. Lee: Defense applications of MEMS, MRS Bulletin 26, 318–319 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. M.R. Taylor, P. Nguyen, J. Ching, K.E. Peterson: Simulation of microfluidic pumping in a genomic DNA blood-processing cassette, J. Micromech. Microeng. 13, 201–208 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. K. Park (Ed.): Controlled Drug Delivery: Challenges and Strategies (American Chemical Society, Washington 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  32. R.S. Shawgo, A.C.R. Grayson, Y. Li, M.J. Cima: BioMEMS for drug delivery, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 6, 329–334 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  33. P.A. Öberg, T. Togawa, F.A. Spelman: Sensors in Medicine and Health Care (Wiley, New York 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. Decuzzi, S. Lee, B. Bhushan, M. Ferrari: A theoretical model for the margination of particles with blood vessels, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33, 179–190 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. S.N. Bhatia, C.S. Chen: Tissue engineering at the micro-scale, Biomed. Microdevices 2, 131–144 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. R.P. Lanza, R. Langer, J. Vacanti (Eds.): Principles of Tissue Engineering (Academic, San Diego 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. Leclerc, K.S. Furukawa, F. Miyata, T. Sakai, T. Ushida, T. Fujii: Fabrication of microstructures in photosensitive biodegradable polymers for tissue engineering applications, Biomaterials 25, 4683–4690 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  38. T.H. Schulte, R.L. Bardell, B.H. Weigl: Microfluidic technologies in clinical diagnostics, Clin. Chim. Acta 321, 1–10 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  39. B. Bhushan: Macro- and microtribology of MEMS materials. In: Modern Tribology Handbook, ed. by B. Bhushan (CRC, Boca Raton 2001) pp. 1515–1548

    Google Scholar 

  40. B. Bhushan: Principles and Applications of Tribology, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  41. B. Bhushan: Introduction to Tribology, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  42. S. Johansson, J.A. Schweitz, L. Tenerz, J. Tiren: Fracture testing of silicon microelements in-situ in a scanning electron microscope, J. Appl. Phys. 63, 4799–4803 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  43. F. Ericson, J.A. Schweitz: Micromechanical fracture strength of silicon, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 5840–5844 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  44. E. Obermeier: Mechanical and thermophysical properties of thin film materials for MEMS: Techniques and devices. In: Micromech. Struct. Mater. Res. Symp. Proc., Vol. 444 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh 1996) pp. 39–57

    Google Scholar 

  45. C.J. Wilson, A. Ormeggi, M. Narbutovskih: Fracture testing of silicon microcantilever beams, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 2386–2393 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  46. W.N. Sharpe Jr., B. Yuan, R.L. Edwards: A new technique for measuring the mechanical properties of thin films, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 6, 193–199 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  47. K. Sato, T. Yoshioka, T. Anso, M. Shikida, T. Kawabata: Tensile testing of silicon film having different crystallographic orientations carried out on a silicon chip, Sens. Actuators A 70, 148–152 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  48. S. Greek, F. Ericson, S. Johansson, M. Fürtsch, A. Rump: Mechanical characterization of thick polysilicon films: Young’s modulus and fracture strength evaluated with microstructures, J. Micromech. Microeng. 9, 245–251 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  49. D.A. LaVan, T.E. Buchheit: Strength of polysilicon for MEMS devices, Proc. SPIE 3880, 40–44 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  50. E. Mazza, J. Dual: Mechanical behavior of a μm-sized single crystal silicon structure with sharp notches, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 47, 1795–1821 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. T. Yi, C.J. Kim: Measurement of mechanical properties for MEMS materials, Meas. Sci. Technol. 10, 706–716 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  52. H. Kahn, M.A. Huff, A.H. Heuer: Heating effects on the Young’s modulus of films sputtered onto micromachined resonators. In: Microelectromech. Struct. Mater. Res. Symp. Proc., Vol. 518 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh 1998) pp. 33–38

    Google Scholar 

  53. S. Johansson, F. Ericson, J.A. Schweitz: Influence of surface-coatings on elasticity, residual-stresses, and fracture properties of silicon microelements, J. Appl. Phys. 65, 122–128 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  54. R. Ballarini, R.L. Mullen, Y. Yin, H. Kahn, S. Stemmer, A.H. Heuer: The fracture toughness of polysilicon microdevices: A first report, J. Mater. Res. 12, 915–922 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  55. H. Kahn, R. Ballarini, R.L. Mullen, A.H. Heuer: Electrostatically actuated failure of microfabricated polysilicon fracture mechanics specimens, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 455, 3807–3823 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  56. A.M. Fitzgerald, R.H. Dauskardt, T.W. Kenny: Fracture toughness and crack growth phenomena of plasma-etched single crystal silicon, Sens. Actuators A 83, 194–199 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  57. T. Tsuchiya, A. Inoue, J. Sakata: Tensile testing of insulating thin films: Humidity effect on tensile strength of SiO2 films, Sens. Actuators A 82, 286–290 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  58. J.A. Connally, S.B. Brown: Micromechanical fatigue testing, Exp. Mech. 33, 81–90 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  59. K. Komai, K. Minoshima, S. Inoue: Fracture and fatigue behavior of single-crystal silicon microelements and nanoscopic AFM damage evaluation, Microsyst. Technol. 5, 30–37 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  60. T. Namazu, Y. Isono, T. Tanaka: Evaluation of size effect on mechanical properties of single-crystal silicon by nanoscale bending test using AFM, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 9, 450–459 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  61. S. Sundararajan, B. Bhushan: Development of AFM-based techniques to measure mechanical properties of nanoscale structures, Sens. Actuators A 101, 338–351 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  62. X. Li, B. Bhushan: Fatigue studies of nanoscale structures for MEMS/NEMS applications using nanoindentation techniques, Surf. Coat. Technol. 163/164, 521–526 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  63. X. Li, B. Bhushan, K. Takashima, C.W. Baek, Y.K. Kim: Mechanical characterization of micro-/nanoscale structures for MEMS/NEMS applications using nanoindentation techniques, Ultramicroscopy 97, 481–494 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  64. G. Wei, B. Bhushan, N. Ferrell, D. Hansford: Microfabrication and nanomechanical characterization of polymer MEMS for biological applications, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 23, 811–819 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  65. M. Palacio, B. Bhushan, N. Ferrell, D. Hansford: Nanomechanical characterization of polymer beam structures for bioMEMS applications, Sens. Actuators A 135, 637–650 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  66. T. Hsu, N. Sun: Residual stresses/strains analysis of MEMS. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Model. Simul. Microsyst. Semicond. Sens. Actuators, ed. by M. Laudon, B. Romanowicz (Computational Publications, Cambridge 1998) pp. 82–87

    Google Scholar 

  67. A. Kolpekwar, C. Kellen, R.D. Blanton: Fault model generation for MEMS. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Model. Simul. Microsyst. Semicond. Sens. Actuators, ed. by M. Laudon, B. Romanowicz (Computational Publications, Cambridge 1998) pp. 111–116

    Google Scholar 

  68. H.A. Rueda, M.E. Law: Modeling of strain in boron-doped silicon cantilevers. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Model. Simul. Microsyst. Semicond. Sens. Actuators, ed. by M. Laudon, B. Romanowicz (Computational Publications, Cambridge 1998) pp. 94–99

    Google Scholar 

  69. M. Heinzelmann, M. Petzold: FEM analysis of microbeam bending experiments using ultra-micro indentation, Comput. Mater. Sci. 3, 169–176 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  70. C.J. Wilson, P.A. Beck: Fracture testing of bulk silicon microcantilever beams subjected to a side load, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 5, 142–150 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  71. B. Bhushan, G.B. Agrawal: Stress analysis of nanostructures using a finite element method, Nanotechnology 13, 515–523 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  72. B. Bhushan, G.B. Agrawal: Finite element analysis of nanostructures with roughness and scratches, Ultramicroscopy 97, 495–507 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  73. K.E. Petersen: Silicon as a mechanical material, Proc. IEEE 70, 420–457 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  74. B. Bhushan, S. Sundararajan, X. Li, C.A. Zorman, M. Mehregany: Micro-/nanotribological studies of single-crystal silicon and polysilicon and SiC films for use in MEMS devices. In: Tribology Issues and Opportunities in MEMS, ed. by B. Bhushan (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1998) pp. 407–430

    Google Scholar 

  75. S. Sundararajan, B. Bhushan: Micro-/nanotribological studies of polysilicon and SiC films for MEMS applications, Wear 217, 251–261 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  76. X. Li, B. Bhushan: Micro-/nanomechanical characterization of ceramic films for microdevices, Thin Solid Films 340, 210–217 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  77. H. Becker, C. Gärtner: Polymer microfabrication methods for microfluidic analytical applications, Electrophoresis 21, 12–26 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  78. J.C. McDonald, D.C. Duffy, J.R. Anderson, D.T. Chiu, H. Wu, O.J.A. Schueller, G.M. Whitesides: Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane), Electrophoresis 21, 27–40 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  79. M. Palacio, B. Bhushan, N. Ferrell, D. Hansford: Adhesion properties of polymer/silicon interfaces for biological micro-/nanoelectromechanical applications, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 25, 1275–1284 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  80. B. Ellis: Polymers: A Property Database (CRC, Boca Raton 2000), http://www.polymersdatabase.com/

    Google Scholar 

  81. J. Brandrup, E.H. Immergut, E.A. Grulke (Eds.): Polymer Handbook, 4th edn. (Wiley, New York 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  82. J.E. Mark: Polymers Data Handbook (Oxford Univ. Press, New York 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  83. B. Bhushan, X. Li: Nanomechanical characterization of solid surfaces and thin films, Int. Mater. Rev. 48, 125–164 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  84. B.R. Lawn, A.G. Evans, D.B. Marshall: Elastic/plastic indentation damage in ceramics: The median/radial system, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 63, 574 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  85. S. Sundararajan, B. Bhushan, T. Namazu, Y. Isono: Mechanical property measurements of nanoscale structures using an atomic force microscope, Ultramicroscopy 91, 111–118 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  86. W.C. Young, R.G. Budynas: Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain (McGraw-Hill, New York 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  87. R.W. Hertzberg: Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials, 3rd edn. (Wiley, New York 1989) pp. 277–278

    Google Scholar 

  88. D.E. Aspnes: Properties of Silicon, EMIS Datarev., Vol. 4 (INSPEC Institution of Electrical Engineers, London 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  89. C.T.-C. Nguyen, R.T. Howe: An integrated CMOS micromechanical resonator high-Q oscillator, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 34, 440–455 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  90. L.J. Hornbeck: A digital light processing update – status and future applications. In: Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Eng., Projection Displ. V, Vol. 3634 (1999) pp. 158–170

    Google Scholar 

  91. M. Tanaka: Fracture toughness and crack morphology in indentation fracture of brittle materials, J. Mater. Sci. 31, 749 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  92. B. Bhushan, S. Venkatesan: Mechanical and tribological properties of silicon for micromechanical applications: A review, Adv. Inf. Storage Syst. 5, 211–239 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  93. B. Bhushan, B.K. Gupta: Handbook of Tribology: Materials, Coatings, and Surface Treatments (McGraw-Hill, New York 1991), reprint with corrections (Krieger, Malabar 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  94. T. Tsuchiya, O. Tabata, J. Sakata, Y. Taga: Specimen size effect on tensile strength of surface-micromachined polycrystalline silicon thin films, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 7, 106–113 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  95. T. Yi, L. Li, C.J. Kim: Microscale material testing of single crystalline silicon: Process effects on surface morphology and tensile strength, Sens. Actuators A 83, 172–178 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  96. I.H. Loh, M.S. Sheu, A.B. Fischer: Biocompatible polymer surfaces. In: Desk Reference of Functional Polymers: Syntheses and Applications, ed. by R. Arshady (American Chemical Society, Washington 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  97. D.B. Holt, P.R. Gauger, A.W. Kusterbech, F.S. Ligler: Fabrication of a capillary immunosensor in polymethyl methacrylate, Biosens. Bioelectron. 17, 95–103 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  98. F.W.J. Billmeyer: Textbook of Polymer Science (Wiley, New York 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  99. Anonymous: Rohm and Haas General Information on PMMA, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  100. T.G. van Kooten, H.T. Spijker, H.H. Busscher: Plasma-treated polystyrene surfaces: Model surface for studying cell-biomaterial interactions, Biomaterials 25, 1735–1747 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  101. M. Alexandre, P. Dubois: Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: Preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials, Mater. Sci. Eng. 28, 1–63 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  102. S.S. Ray, M. Okamoto: Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: A review from preparation to processing, Prog. Polym. Sci. 28, 1539–1641 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  103. R.H. Boundy, R.F. Boyer (Eds.): Styrene, Its Polymers, Copolymers and Derivatives (Reinhold, New York 1952)

    Google Scholar 

  104. C.A. Harper (Ed.): Modern Plastics Encyclopedia (McGraw-Hill, New York 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  105. S.P. Timoshenko, J.N. Goodier: Theory of Elasticity, 3rd edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York 1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  106. J.E. Shigley, L.D. Mitchell: Mechanical Engineering Design, 4th edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York 1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nanoprobe Lab for Bio- & Nanotechnology & Biomimetics, The Ohio State University, 201 W. 19th Ave., OH 43210-1107, Columbus, USA

    Bharat Bhushan

Authors
  1. Bharat Bhushan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Bharat Bhushan

Appendix: Fabrication Procedure for the Double-Anchoredand Cantilever Beams

Appendix: Fabrication Procedure for the Double-Anchoredand Cantilever Beams

The starting materials for the polymer microbeams are PPMA (molecular weight 250000, Scientific Polymer Products), PMMA (molecular weight 75000, Sigma-Aldrich), PS (melt flow index 4.0, Sigma-Aldrich) and PS/clay solutions in anisole (Acros Organics). The clay additive in PS/clay is Cloisite 20A surface modified natural montmorillonite (Southern Clay Products, Inc.) with a thickness of approximately 1 nm and lateral dimensions of 70−150 nm. The surface modification of the clay additive improves the dispersion of the nanoparticles in the polymer matrix, thus improving the properties of the composite. To prepare the nanocomposite, the clay was first dispersed in the PS matrix by melt compounding at a concentration of 10 wt% (clay/PS). The composite was then dissolved in anisole and sonicated for at least eight hours to dissolve the polymer and redisperse the particles.

Double-anchored polymer microbeams were fabricated using a soft lithography-based micromolding process along with standard photolithography [32.65]. The process involves selectively filling a poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) mold with the polymer of interest followed by transfer of the resulting structures to a prefabricated substrate. This substrate is a silicon wafer with a layer of SU-8 25 negative tone photoresist (MicroChem Corp.) patterned by photolithography to create 25 μm-wide channels, which is the resulting length of the suspended beams. (The second number 25 in the SU-8 designation relates to a viscosity appropriate for a given thickness.)

A patterned PDMS mold with the desired polymer beam geometry was fabricated from a photoresist master . Briefly, a layer of SU-8 5 photoresist was spin coated on silicon, and photolithography was used to define 5 μm-wide photoresist features separated by 45 μm gaps. A 10:1 ratio of T-2 PDMS translucent base and curing agent (Dow Corning) was mixed thoroughly and poured over the photoresist master to transfer the pattern into the PDMS. The mold was then placed in a vacuum desiccator to remove bubbles. The sample was removed from the vacuum periodically, and a razor blade was used to remove surface bubbles. After the bubbles were completely removed, the PDMS mold was allowed to cure at room temperature for 48 h before removing it from the wafer.

Next, the PDMS mold was selectively coated with the polymer solution to form the microbeams and then transferred to the substrate. Figure 32.32 is a schematic of the fabrication process used for making the polymer microbeams. As shown in Fig. 32.32a, the polymer solutions were spin coated on the PDMS mold for one minute. A 10% solution of polymer was spin coated on a mold with 5.3 μm-deep features at 3000 rpm for fabrication of the beams in the bending experiments. After spin coating, the mold was brought into contact with a heated glass plate to promote adhesion of the contacting polymer materials. This process removed the polymer material from the raised surfaces of the mold, resulting in the polymer remaining only in the recessed portions of the PDMS mold. The glass plate was heated to 175∘C for all four materials. As shown in Fig. 32.32b, the selectively coated mold was then aligned with the photolithographically patterned silicon substrate so that the beams of interest (PPMA, PMMA, PS, PS/clay) ran perpendicular to the channels defined in the photoresist. The substrate was then heated and pressure was applied to the top of the mold to transfer the material onto the substrate. The transfer temperatures for PPMA, PS, PS/clay and PMMA were 95, 125, 125, and 175∘C respectively, and the transfer pressure for all materials was around 0.21 MPa.

Fig. 32.32a,b
figure 32figure 32

Schematic of the micromolding process used in polymer double-anchored beam fabrication. (a) Selective patterning of PDMS mold: (i) mold is spin coated with a polymer layer; (ii) mold is inverted and brought into contact with a heated glass plate; (iii) mold is removed from the plate, transferring the surface polymer onto the glass; and (iv) mold is left with polymer only in the recessed features. (b) Stamping of the polymer beams: (i) selectively patterned mold; (ii) mold is inverted and aligned with the photolithographically patterned substrate; (iii) mold and substrate are brought into contact under heat and pressure; and (iv) polymer is transferred onto the photoresist and mold is removed (after [32.65])

Full size image

After removal of the mold, two types of polymer beams were transferred onto the wafer sample. The first type is supported beams, which was used to determine the hardness, elastic modulus, and creep response. The second type is suspended beams, on which the bending experiments were performed. The double-anchored beam samples studied by Palacio et al. [32.65] were 3−5 μm thick, 5 μm wide and nominally 25 μm long.

The process for fabrication of the polymer cantilever for lateral bending tests is shown in Fig. 32.33 [32.65]. A PDMS mold was first cast from a photolithographically patterned SU-8/silicon master. The resulting molds consisted of 50 μm-wide channels that were approximately 27 μm deep. The PDMS mold was then coated with the polymer of interest (PS or PS/clay). The polymers were spin coated on the mold at 3000 rpm for one minute at concentrations of 15 and 10% for PS and PS/clay respectively. The polymer on the raised surface of the mold was removed by contacting the surface with a glass slide heated to 180∘C. The mold was then inverted and manually aligned with a silicon substrate coated with patches of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), which acts as the sacrificial layer. The PVA was patterned using photolithography and reactive ion etching with an oxygen plasma. The substrate was heated and pressure was applied to the top side of the mold to transfer the polymer from the recessed features of the mold onto the substrate such that a 350 μm portion of it is attached to the PVA and the remainder is attached to the bare silicon surface. Transfer temperatures for PS and PS/clay were 150 and 175∘C respectively. The process was repeated to apply another layer of beams across the length of the original layer. This was performed to provide reinforcement as it was observed that the one-layer design was not robust. The cantilever beam samples studied by Palacio et al. [32.65] were 12−27 μm thick, 60−80 μm wide and 350 μm long.

Fig. 32.33
figure 33figure 33

Schematic of the polymer cantilever beam fabrication process: (i) PDMS mold; (ii) mold spin coated with the polymer of interest; (iii) selectively filled mold after removal of surface polymer; (iv) mold aligned with sacrificial layer; (v) polymer features transfer to the substrate using heat and pressure; (vi) mold aligned for a second time to add another layer of lines across original beams for reinforcement; (vii) polymer features transfer to the substrate using heat and pressure; and (viii) cantilever structures after removal of the sacrificial layer (after [32.65])

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bhushan, B. (2017). Nanomechanical Properties of Nanostructures and Scale Effects. In: Bhushan, B. (eds) Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54357-3_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54357-3_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54355-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54357-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation