Skip to main content

Robust Inference and Local Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2015 (MFCS 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9234))

  • 693 Accesses

Abstract

We introduce a new feature to inference and learning which we call robustness. By robustness we intuitively model the case that the observation of the learner might be corrupted. We survey a new and novel approach to model such possible corruption as a zero-sum game between an adversary that selects the corruption and a leaner that predict the correct label. The corruption of the observations is done in a worse-case setting, by an adversary, where the main restriction is that the adversary is limited to use one of a fixed know class of modification functions. The main focus in this line of research is on efficient algorithms both for the inference setting and for the learning setting. In order to be efficient in the dimension of the domain, one cannot hope to inspect all the possible inputs. For this, we have to invoke local computation algorithms, that inspect only a logarithmic fraction of the domain per query.

This research was supported in part by The Israeli Centers of Research Excellence (I-CORE) program, (Center No. 4/11), by a grant from the Israel Science Foundation (ISF), by a grant from United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One can clearly map the dynamic setting to the static setting, by encoding the adversary action in the modification rules, but this will imply that the number of modifications rules would be \(m^{|\mathcal{X}|}\).

  2. 2.

    This also implicitly implies that in the dynamic setting \(|\mathcal{X}|/m\le |\mathcal{Z}|\le m |\mathcal{X}|\).

References

  1. Alon, N., Rubinfeld, R., Vardi, S., Xie, N.: Space-efficient local computation algorithms. In: SODA, pp. 1132–1139 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angluin, D., Laird, P.: Learning from noisy examples. Mach. Learn. 2(4), 343–370 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Or, M., Linial, N.: Collective coin flipping, robust voting schemes and minima of banzhaf values. In: FOCS, pp. 408–416 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Tal, A., El Ghaoui, L., Nemirovski, A.S.: Robust Optimization. Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Even, G., Medina, M., Ron, D.: Best of two local models: local centralized and local distributed algorithms. In: CoRR, abs/1402.3796 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feige, U., Mansour, Y., Schapire, R.: Learning and inference in the presence of corrupted inputs. In: COLT (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kahn, J., Kalai, G., Linial, N.: The influence of variables on boolean functions. In: FOCS, pp. 68–80 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kearns, M.J., Li, M.: Learning in the presence of malicious errors. SIAM J. Comput. 22(4), 807–837 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. MacKay, D.J.C.: Information Theory. Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mansour, Y., Rubinstein, A., Tennenholtz, M.: Robust probabilistic inference. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, January 4–6, 2015, pp. 449–460 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mansour, Y., Rubinstein, A., Vardi, S., Xie, N.: Converting online algorithms to local computation algorithms. ICALP 1, 653–664 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Mansour, Y., Vardi, S.: A local computation approximation scheme to maximum matching. In: APPROX-RANDOM, pp. 260–273 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mossel, E., O’Donnell, R., Oleszkiewicz, K.: Noise stability of functions with low influences invariance and optimality. In: FOCS, pp. 21–30 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rubinfeld, R., Tamir, G., Vardi, S., Xie, N.: Fast local computation algorithms. In: ICS, pp. 223–238 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Valiant, L.G.: Learning disjunction of conjunctions. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1, IJCAI 1985, pp. 560–566 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yishay Mansour .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mansour, Y. (2015). Robust Inference and Local Algorithms. In: Italiano, G., Pighizzini, G., Sannella, D. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2015. MFCS 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9234. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48057-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48057-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48056-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48057-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics