Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Two Frameworks to Promote E-Leadership and Teacher Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover ICT in Education in Global Context

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

  • 1373 Accesses

Abstract

Working in partnership with Microsoft, a team of university faculty created the Technology Enriched Instruction (TEI) professional development workshop to promote the effective use of technology in the classroom. This workshop was originally aimed at teacher educators in an effort to support best practices based on theory and research about using technology in teaching. After piloting, the TEI workshop was extended to meet the needs of all higher education faculty. Two conceptual frameworks form the cornerstone of the workshop: TPACK and 21CLD. These frameworks provide the intellectual and practical grounding for all workshop activities. This chapter explores the application of TPACK and 21CLD as well as the decision-making behind and implications for expanding the focus of TEI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alsofyani, M. M., Aris, B. B., Eynon, R., & Majid, N. A. (2012). A preliminary evaluation of short blended online training workshop for TPACK development using technology acceptance model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology—TOJET, 11(3), 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, L., Wetzel, K., Foulger, T. S., & Williams, M. K. (2010). Professional development 2.0: transforming teacher education pedagogy with 21st century tools. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(1), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. R., McCaleb, K., & Baker, C. (2015). Paradigm shift toward student engagement in technology mediated courses. In Handbook of research on innovative technology integration in higher education (p. 74). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besculides, M., Trebino, L., & Nelson, H. (2012). Successful strategies for educating hard-to-reach populations: Lessons learned from Massachusetts’ train-the-trainer project using the “Helping You Take Care of Yourself” curriculum. Health Education Journal, 71(3), 350–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, G. (2010) The always connected generation. Learning & Learning with Technology, 38(2), 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, M., & Plucker, J. (2008). P-16 education: Where are we going? Where have we been? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(7), 472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPACK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 3–30). NY: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article1.cfm.

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, M., Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2011). Teaching, learning, and sharing: How today’s higher education faculty use social media. Babson Survey Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J., Mann, M. K., Jones, C., van Buschbach, S., Olff, M., & Bisson, J. I. (2012). The Most effective way of delivering a train-the-trainers program: A systematic review. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 32(3), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. W. (2010). TPACK game on. Learning & Leading with Technology, 37(8), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–36). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stover, S., & Veres, M. (2013). TPACK in higher education: Using the TPACK framework for professional development. Global Education Journal, 2013(1), 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhrheinrich, J. (2011). Examining the effectiveness of a train-the-trainer model: Training teachers to use pivotal response training. Evanston, IL: Society For Research On Educational Effectiveness. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED518863.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge Microsoft for their sponsorship of the TEI project. We also wish to acknowledge Dr. Mark Hofer, The College of William and Mary, and Dr. Jim Ptaszynski, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, for the vital roles they played in this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. James Madison University, 800 S. Main St., MSC 6908, Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA

    David A. Slykhuis

  2. 38 Laurel St., Harrisonburg, VA, 22801, USA

    David A. Slykhuis

  3. North Carolina State University, College of Education, Poe Hall, Box 7801, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA

    John K. Lee

  4. 2210 Wheeler Rd, Raleigh, NC, 27067, USA

    John K. Lee

Authors
  1. David A. Slykhuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John K. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Slykhuis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    Ronghuai Huang

  2. Athabasca University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Kinshuk

  3. Intel Corporation, Corporate Affairs Group, Albuquerque, USA

    Jon K. Price

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slykhuis, D.A., Lee, J.K. (2016). Using Two Frameworks to Promote E-Leadership and Teacher Development. In: Huang, R., Kinshuk, Price, J. (eds) ICT in Education in Global Context. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47956-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47956-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47955-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47956-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation