Skip to main content

Post-enlargement Migration and Adjustment in a Receiving Country: The Case of Sweden

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Labor Migration, EU Enlargement, and the Great Recession

Abstract

Sweden’s immigration policy has changed drastically on several occasions over time. Immigration policy was very liberal from the 1860s until WW1, with no requirements regarding passports, visas or work permits, although international migration mainly involved emigration during this period in the context of Sweden, with wages lower than in neighboring countries. The policy changed in 1914 after the start of WW1, and the controls became gradually more stringent during the war, with a work permit compulsory and difficult to attain for those who wanted to move to Sweden for work. While the immigration regulation remained after the war, the requirements for those coming from other Nordic countries were made slightly less stringent. The work permit requirement in the interwar-period was motivated by the high unemployment rate, based upon the notion that jobs should be reserved for natives.

The authors thank the anonymous referee as well as the editors of this volume and Per Lundborg for providing a number of suggestions that helped to improve the chapter significantly. We will also thank SIEPS for economic support making it possible to access the register data used in this chapter. We remain responsible for any mistakes still present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Boguslaw (2012) for a detailed presentation of the development of the Swedish immigration policy and Wadensjö (2012) for a presentation of some of the important changes in the twentieth century.

  2. 2.

    See Pedersen et al. (2008) for a study of the first 50 years of the Common Nordic Labour Market.

  3. 3.

    See Doyle et al. (2006) for the political process leading to the decision of no transitional rules.

  4. 4.

    It is possible to present information on the migration flows according to country of birth, country of citizenship or country of arrival and departure. The tables presented here are based on country of birth. The differences between the different legal statuses are small. One example: The number of immigrants born in Poland was 4500 in 2011 and the number of immigrants with Polish citizenship was 4403 the same year. The corresponding numbers for emigration were 1530 for Polish born and 1395 Polish citizens.

  5. 5.

    The information in this paper is updated with 4 years compared to Gerdes and Wadensjö (2008, 2009).

  6. 6.

    See OECD (2011).

  7. 7.

    Some may live in Sweden and work in non-registered employment, but the number of persons for which information on both employment and income transfers is missing is too large for this to be the main explanation.

  8. 8.

    See Wadensjö et al. (2012) for a discussion of the economic effects of EU12 immigration. For recent general surveys of the effects of immigration, see Okkerse (2008) and Pekkala Kerr and Kerr (2011).

  9. 9.

    See Longhi et al. (2005a, 2005b, 2008).

  10. 10.

    Per Lundborg, SULCIS, Stockholm University has a research project on this topic. His preliminary results are indicating wage effects.

  11. 11.

    See Hedberg and Pettersson (2012).

  12. 12.

    There is not any study of the wage effect of immigration for the construction sector in Sweden, but it is not unlikely that there is a negative wage effect as is found in Norway. See Bratsberg and Raaum (2012).

  13. 13.

    See OECD (2011).

References

  • Boguslaw, J. (2012). Svensk invandringspolitik under 500 år. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (2003). The labor demand curve is downward sloping: Reexamining the impact of immigration on the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1737–1744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G., Grogger, J., & Hanson, G. H. (2008). Imperfect substitution between immigrants and natives: A reappraisal. (NBER working paper no. 13887).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratsberg, B., & Raaum, O. (2012). Immigration and wages: Evidence from construction. Economic Journal, 122(565), 1177–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. (2001). Immigrant inflows, native outflows and the local labor market impacts of higher immigration. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(1), 22–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., & Shleifer, A. (2009). Immigration and inequality. American Economic Review, 99(2), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, N., Hughes, G., & Wadensjö, E. (2006). Freedom of movement for workers from central and Eastern Europe. Experiences in Ireland and Sweden. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies (SIEPS). Report, 2006, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, C., & Wadensjö, E. (2008). Immigrants from the new EU member states and the Swedish welfare state. (Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies (SIEPS), Report 2008:9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, C., & Wadensjö, E. (2009). Post-enlargement migration and labour market impact in Sweden. In M. Kahanec & K. F. Zimmermann (Eds.), EU labor markets after post-enlargement migration. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, C., & Pettersson, K. (2012). Disadvantage, ethnic niching or pursuit of a vision? Motives of immigrant women care entrepreneurs in the ageing Swedish society. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 13(4), 423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2005a). A meta-analytic assessment of the effect of immigration on wages. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(3), 451–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2005b). The fallacy of “job robbing”: A meta-analyses of estimates of the effect of immigration on employment. Journal of Migration and Refugee Issues, 1(4), 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2008). Meta-analysis of empirical evidence on the labor market impacts of immigration. Région et Développement, 27(1), 161–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manacorda, M., Manning, A., & Wadsworth, J. (2012). The impact of immigration on the structure of wages: Theory and evidence from Britain. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(1), 120–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). International migration outlook: SOPEMI 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okkerse, L. (2008). How to measure labor market effects of immigration: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. (2012). Rethinking the effect of immigration on wages. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(1), 152–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, P. J., Røed, M., & Wadensjö, E. (2008). The common Nordic labor market at 50. (TemaNord 2008:506).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkala Kerr, S., & Kerr, W. R. (2011). Economic impacts of immigration: A survey. Finnish Economic Papers, 24(1), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadensjö, E. (2012). Framtidens migration, Underlagsrapport 5 till Framtidskommissionen. Stockholm: Statsrådsberedningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadensjö, E., Ruhs, M., & Wójcicka, A. (2012). Labor migration: What’s in it for us? Experiences from Sweden, the UK and Poland. Stockholm: FORES.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christer Gerdes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Data on Migration Flows: Some Problems

Appendix: Data on Migration Flows: Some Problems

Knowledge about migration and its effects demands statistical information of a high quality. However, there are some problems in this respect, as detailed below.

  • There is underreporting (or late reporting) of the emigration of immigrants, which leads to the migrant population being overestimated and the employment rates underestimated. The most common likely explanation for the underreporting of emigration is a lack of information on how to do it or simply forgetting to do it. However, there may also be other explanations.

  • Another problem is that only those staying at least 1 year (or intending to stay 1 year) should be registered in the register of the Swedish population and thereby included in the statistics. Those who stay for at least 3 months are registered by the tax authority and are given a special “coordination number”. When sent to Statistics Sweden, this information is not combined with information on the country of origin or citizenship.

  • Some foreign workers are arriving as tourists and staying in Sweden for less than three months and thus are not included in any of the registers.

  • Another group for which we lack information is those who work in Sweden on a temporary basis for companies based in another EU country.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gerdes, C., Wadensjö, E. (2016). Post-enlargement Migration and Adjustment in a Receiving Country: The Case of Sweden. In: Kahanec, M., Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Labor Migration, EU Enlargement, and the Great Recession. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45320-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45320-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45319-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45320-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics