Skip to main content

Teaching in Different Spaces – How Professionals Work Together in All-Day Schools in Switzerland and in Leisure Time Centres in Sweden

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Extended Education from an International Comparative Point of View

Abstract

Professionals in all-day schools and in leisure time centres strive to purposefully extend the curriculum in the classroom with extracurricular activities. Extracurricular activities are more or less organized activities outside of the traditional teaching lessons during a regular school day and include supervised games, free play, and structured lessons organized before and after lunchtime. These activities are held at the school building. Such activities are added to children’s school days, making them more integrated to maximize social and cognitive learning for students and to enhance educational development. Education at school is extended in time and space, taught by professionals. The multi-professional cooperation among classroom teachers and extracurricular activities teachers is seen as powerful but can be rife with tension as professional boundaries are crossed. Data from interviews with classroom teachers and extracurricular activities teachers focusing on the meaning of extended education in newly organized all-day schools in urban Switzerland (n=32) and in Sweden (n=18) is analyzed using Grounded Theory Methods and viewed as a field for negotiating professional responsibilities. Despite different traditions in all day schooling, a lack of understanding of the other profession is a hindering factor for a symmetrical professional cooperation in both countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Change history

  • 07 December 2019

    Correction to:

    Chapter 7 in: M. Schüpbach and N. Lilla (eds.), Extended Education from an International Comparative Point of View

References

  • Akkerman, S. & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S. & Bruining, T. (2016). Multilevel boundary crossing in a professional development school partnership. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 240–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allemann-Ghionda, C. (2003). Ganztagsschule – ein Blick über den Tellerrand [All-day schools – A look beyond one’s own backyard]. In S. Appel, H. Ludwig, & U. Rother (Eds.), Neue Chancen für die Bildung (pp. 206-215). Schwalbach (Taunus), Germany: Wochenschau-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, B. (2013). Nya fritidspedagoger - i spänningsfältet mellan tradition och nya styrformer [The new leisure time centre pedagogues- tension between tradition and new forms of control] (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:603114/FULLTEXT02

  • Breuer A. (2011). Lehrer-Erzieher-Teams – Kooperation als Differenzierung durch Zuständigkeit [Teams of teachers and educators – cooperation as differentiation through responsibility]. In K. Speck, T. Olk, O. Böhm-Kasper, H.-J. Stolz, & C. Wiezorek (Eds.), Ganztagsschulische Kooperation und Professionsentwicklung. Studien zu multiprofessionellen Teams und sozialräumlicher Vernetzung (pp. 85 -101). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, A. & Reh, S. (2010). Zwei ungleiche Professionen? Wie LehrerInnen und ErzieherInnen in Teams zusammenarbeiten [Two unequal professions? How teachers and educators work together]. Soziale Passagen, 2(1), 29-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böttcher, W., Maykus, S., Altermann, A., & Liesegang, T. (2011). Multiprofessionelle Kooperation an Ganztagsschulen [Multi-professional cooperation in all-day schools]. In K. Speck, T. Olk, O. Böhm-Kaspar, H. Stolz, & C. Wiezorek (Eds.). Ganztagsschulische Kooperation und Professionsentwicklung. Studien zu multiprofessionellen Teams und sozialräumlicher Vernetzung (pp.102-113). Weinheim, Germany: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnard, P. & Swann, M. (2010). Pupil perceptions of learning with artists: a new order of experience? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(2), 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calander, F. (1999). Från fritidens pedagog till hjälplärare. Fritidspedagogers och lärares yrkesrelation i integrerade arbetslag [From being a pedagogue of leisure to becoming an assistant teacher. The professional relationship between leisure time pedagogues and teachers in integrated working teams] (Doctoral dissertation). Uppsala University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiapparini, E., Selmani, K., Kappler, C., & Schuler Braunschweig, P. (2018). „Die wissen gar nicht, was wir alles machen“. Befunde zu multiprofessioneller Kooperation im Zuge der Einführung von Tagesschulen in der Stadt Zürich [„They don’t know what we’re doing“. Multi-professional cooperation during the implementation of all-day schools in Zurich]. In E. Chiapparini, R. Stohler, & E. Bussmann (Eds.), Soziale Arbeit im Kontext Schule. Aktuelle Entwicklungen in Praxis und Forschung in der Schweiz (pp. 48–60). Opladen, Germany: Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, H. (2011). Parental rights and responsibilities. Analyzing social policy and lived experiences. Bristol, UK: The policy press.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Zurich (2018). Tagesschule 2025 [All-day school 2025]. Retrieved from www.stadtzuerich.ch/ssd/de/index/volksschule/tagesschule2025.html.

  • Creese, A, Norwich, B., & Daniels H. (2000). Evaluating teacher support teams in secondary schools: supporting teachers for SEN and other needs. Research Papers in Education, 15(3), 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditton, H. (2000). Qualitätskontrolle und Qualitätssicherung in Schule und Unterricht. Ein Überblick zum Stand der empirischen Forschung [Quality control and management in schools and classes. Overview of the state of empirical research]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 41, 73-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dizinger, V., Fussangel, K., & Böhm-Kasper, O. (2011). Interprofessionelle Kooperation an Ganztagsschulen aus der Perspektive der Lehrkräfte – Wie lässt sie sich erfassen und wie wird sie im schulischen Belastungs- und Beanspruchungs-Geschehen bewertet? [Interprofessional cooperation in all-day schools from the teachers’ perspective – how can it be measured and how is it rated in events of stress and strain in teaching?]. In K. Speck, T. Olk, O. Böhm-Kasper, H.-J. Stolz, & C. Wiezorek (Eds.), Ganztagsschulische Kooperation und Professionsentwicklung. Studien zu multiprofessionellen Teams und sozialräumlicher Vernetzung, (pp. 114-127). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher T., Leadbetter J., & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving interprofessional collaborations: multi-agency working for children’s wellbeing. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fend, H. (2006). Geschichte des Bildungswesens. Der Sonderweg im europäischen Kulturraum [History of the educational system. The separate path in the European cultural area]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, N., Klieme, E., Holtappels, H.-G. Stecher, L., & Rauschenbach, T. (2013). Ganztagsschule 2012/2013. Deskriptive Befunde einer bundesweiten Befragung [All-day schooling 2012/2013. Descriptive results of a national survey]. Frankfurt a. M., Germany: DIPF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, N., Kuhn, H. P., & Pfaar, J. (2017). Professionalization for multi-professional cooperation in german all-day schools. Paper presented at the First WERA-IRN Extended Education Conference, Bamberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, N., Radisch, F., & Schüpbach, M. (2014). International perspectives on extracurricular activities: conditions of effects on student development, communities and schools – editorial. Journal for Educational Research Online, 6(3), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M., Miller, C., & Ross, N. (2000). The impact of individual philosophies of teamwork on multi-professional practice and the implication for education. Journal of interprofessional Care, 14(3), 237-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, N. (2001). Professionalism, change and the politics of life-long learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 23(1), 5-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, N. (2005). Professionalism, partnership and joined-up thinking: a research review of front-line working with children and families. Dartington, UK: Research in Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker, R., Dobel-Ober, D., Berridge, D., & Sinclair, R. (2004). More than the sum of its parts? Interprofessional working in the education of looked after children. Children and Society, 18(3), 179-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. (1999). Yrkeskulturer i möte: läraren, fritidspedagogen och samverkan [The meetings between professional cultures: teacher, leisure time pedagogues and cooperation] (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/7609/1/gupea_2077_7609_1.pdf

  • Holtappels, H. G. (2006). Stichwort: Ganztagssschule [Keyword: all-day school]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(1), 5-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtappels, H. G., Klieme, E., Rauschenbach, T., & Stecher, L. (Eds.) (2008). Ganztagsschule in Deutschland. Ergebnisse der Ausgangserhebung der „Studie zur Entwicklung von Ganztagsschulen“ (StEG) [All-day schooling in Germany. Results of the initial survey „Study on the Development of All-day Schools (StEG)“] (2nd ed.). Weinheim, Germany: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig M.-S. (2007). Kann der Ausbau der institutionellen Kinderbetreuung das Vereinbarkeitsproblem lösen? Rückfragen an den familienpolitischen Konsens [Can the development of institutional childcare solve the compatibility problem? Enquiries to the family policy consensus]. In F. Lettke & A. Lange (Eds.), Generationen und Familien (pp. 354-377). Frankfurt a. M., Germany: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, M. (2018). Risken är ju att det blir mer skola av det. En studie om teknik på fritidshem [The risk is that there will be more school. A study about technology in leisure time centre] (Comp.). Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutzi, M., Schüpbach, M., & Thomann, K. (2013). Bedingungen multiprofessioneller Kooperation in zehn Schweizer Tagesschulen [Conditions of multi-professional cooperation in ten Swiss allday schools]. In Schüpbach, M., A. Slokar, & W. Nieuwenboom (Eds.). Kooperation als Herausforderung in Schule und Tagesschule (pp. 95-112). Bern, Switzerland: Haupt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klerfelt, A. & Haglund, B. (2014). Presentation of research on school-age educare in Sweden. International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 2(1), 45-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreis, A., Wick, J., & Kosorok Labhart, C. (2016). Kooperation im Kontext schulischer Heterogenität [Cooperation in the context of heterogeneity in schools]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lago, L. & Elvstrand, H. (2017). Pupils’ everyday transitions in school as a condition for social relations and activities in leisure time centres. Early Years: An International Research Journal. Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2017.1371675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd edition). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nittel, D. (2011). Von der Profession zur sozialen Welt pädagogisch Tätiger? Vorarbeiten zu einer komparativ angelegten Empirie pädagogischer Arbeiten [From the profession to the social world of pedagogical workers? Preliminary works on comparative empiricism of pedagogic work]. In W. Helsper & R. Tippelt (Eds.), Zeitschrift für Pädagogik – 57. Beiheft (pp. 40-59).). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M., Anning, A., & Frost, N. (2005). ‘When is a teacher not a teacher?’: knowledge creation and the professional identity of teachers within multi-agency teams. Studies in Continuing Education, 27(2), 175-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlin, M. (2012). Fritidshemmets historiska dilemman: en nutidshistoria om konstruktionen av fritidshemmet i samordning med skolan [The historical dilemma of the leisure time centre: a contemporary story about the construction of the leisure time centre in coordination with school]. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholms Universitets Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothland, M. (2012). Belastung und Beanspruchung im Lehrberuf. Modelle, Befunde, Interventionen [Stress and strain in the teaching profession. Models, results, interventions]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüpbach, M. (2010). Ganztägige Bildung und Betreuung im Primarschulalter. Qualität und Wirksamkeit verschiedener Schulformen im Vergleich [All-day schooling and childcare in primary education. Comparing quality and efficacy of different school types]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüpbach, M., Jutzi, M., & Thomann, K. (2012). Expertise zur Kooperation in verschiedenen Kooperationsfeldern. Dienstleistung zuhanden des ED Basel-Stadt [Expertise on cooperation in different fields of cooperation. A service to the educational directorate of the canton of Basel-Stadt]. Bern, Switzerland: Bern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüpbach, M., Slokar, A., & Nieuwenboom, W. (2013). Kooperation als Herausforderung in Schule und Tagesschule [Cooperation as a challenge in school and all-day school]. Bern, Switzerland: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler Braunschweig, P. & Kappler, C. (2017). Tagesstrukturen und Tagesschulen in der Stadt und im Kanton Zürich [Day structures and all-day schools in the city and the canton of Zurich]. In M. Schüpbach, L. Frei, & W. Nieuwenboom (Eds.), Tagesschulen. Ein Überblick (pp. 85-99). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (2015). Die soziale Situation beim Mittagessen in der Ganztagsschule [The social situation of lunch in all-day schools]. In S. Reh, B. Fritzsche, T.-S. Idel, & K. Rabenstein (Eds.), Lernkulturen: Rekonstruktion pädagogischer Praktiken an Ganztagsschulen (pp. 204-218). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck, K., Olk, T., & Stimpel, T. (2011). Professionelle Kooperation unterschiedlicher Berufskulturen an Ganztagsschulen – Zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit [Professional cooperation between different professional cultures in all-day schools – claims and reality]. In K. Speck, T. Olk, O. Böhm-Kasper, H.-J. Stolz, & C. Wiezorek (Eds.), Ganztagsschulische Kooperation und Professionsentwicklung. Studien zu multiprofessionellen Teams und sozialräumlicher Vernetzung (pp. 69-84). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies, A. & Stecklina, G. (Eds.) (2005). Die Ganztagsschule. Keine Chance ohne Kooperation – Handlungsformen und institutionelle Bedingungen [All-day School. No Chance Without Cooperation – Operating Forms and Institutional Conditions] (Vol. 2). Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C. & Tillmann K. (2011). Koordinierte Vielfalt? Über die Arbeit in multiprofessionellen Ganztagsteams [Coordinated diversity? Working in multi-professional all-day teams]. In K. Speck, T. Olk, O. Böhm-Kasper, H.-J. Stolz, & C. Wiezorek (Eds.), Ganztagsschulische Kooperation und Professionsentwicklung. Studien zu multiprofessionellen Teams und sozialräumlicher Vernetzung (pp. 48-68). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E.T. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish National Agency of Education (2018). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre. Stockholm, Sweden: Skolverket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann, K. & Rollett, W. (2011). Multiprofessionelle Kooperation und Partizipation an Ganztagsschulen – welche Auswirkungen hat die strukturelle Einbindung des weiteren pädagogisch tätigen Personals auf die berufsgruppenübergreifende Zusammenarbeit? [Multiprofessional cooperation and participation in all-day schools - which effects does the structural integration of the educational staff have on inter-professional cooperation?]. In K. Speck, T. Olk, O. Böhm-Kasper, H.-J. Stolz, & C. Wiezorek (Eds.), Ganztagsschulische Kooperation und Professionsentwicklung. Studien zu multiprofessionellen Teams und sozialräumlicher Vernetzung (pp. 29-47). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrell, H. & Vanderstraeten, R. (2007). Familie und Schule: Zwei Orte der Erziehung [Family and school: two places of education]. In J. Aderhold & O. Kranz (Eds.), Intention und Funktion. Probleme der Vermittlung psychischer und sozialer Systeme (pp. 159-174). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesterinen, O., Kangas, M., Krokfors, L., Kopisto K., & Salo, L. (2017). Inter-professional pedagogical collaboration between teachers and their out-of-school partners. Educational Studies, 43(2), 231-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Züchner, I. (2013). Formale, non-formale und informelle Bildung in der Ganztagsschule [Formal, nonformal and informal education in all-day schools]. Jugendhilfe, 51, 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Schuler Braunschweig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schuler Braunschweig, P., Elvstrand, H., Kappler, C., Lago, L., Jansson, M., Chiapparini, E. (2019). Teaching in Different Spaces – How Professionals Work Together in All-Day Schools in Switzerland and in Leisure Time Centres in Sweden. In: Schüpbach, M., Lilla, N. (eds) Extended Education from an International Comparative Point of View. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27172-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27172-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27171-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27172-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics