Skip to main content

The Drama Triangle of Religion and Violence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religion and Violence

Part of the book series: Wiener Beiträge zur Islamforschung ((WSI))

  • 526 Accesses

Abstract

The intersection of religion and violence is not the invention of our era. From time immemorial these two have been closely connected, interwoven dimensions of human experience. As soon as humans come together, form societies, and develop culture, both religion and violence become central features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ai, A.L., & Park, C.L. (2005). Possibilities of the positive following violence and trauma: Informing the coming decade of research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 242-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleby, R.S. (2000). The Ambivalence of the sacred: Religion, violence and reconciliation. Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariarajah, S.W. (2005). The challenge of building communities of peace for all: The richness and dilemma of diversities. The Ecumenical Review, 57(April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (1998). The presence of violence in religion. In J.H. Goldstein (Ed.), Why we watch: The attractions of violent entertainment. New York: Oxford University Press, 163-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadell, S., Regehr, C., & Hemsworth, D. (2003). Factors contributing to posttraumatic growth: A proposed structural equation model. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 73(3), 279-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmil, D., & Breznitz, S. (1991). Personal trauma and world view: Are extremely stressful experiences related to political attitudes, religious beliefs, and future orientation? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 4(3), 393-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, K.M., Davidson, J.R.T., & Lee, L.C. (2003). Spirituality, resilience, and anger in survivors of violent trauma: A community survey. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(5), 487-494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doehring, C. (1993). Internal desecration: Traumatization and representations of God. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P. (2001). The psychoanalysis of violence. Paper presented at the Dallas Society for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy Dallas. Retrieved April 11, 2016 from http://psychematters.com/papers/fonagy4.htm

  • Fontana, A., & Rosenheck, R. (2004). Trauma, change in strength of religious faith, and mental health service use among veterans treated for PTSD. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 192(9), 579-584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, R.N. (1977). Violence and the sacred. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J.H. (Ed.). (1998). Why we watch: The attractions of violent entertainment. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudorf, C.E. (1992). Victimization: Examining Christian complicity. Philadelphia, PA: Trinity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, L. (2015). More Americans killed by guns since 1968 than in all U.S. wars, columnist Nicholas Kristof writes. Politifact.com. Retrieved April 11, 2016 from http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/aug/27/nicholas-kristof/more-americanskilled-guns-1968-all-wars-says-colu/

  • Jerryson, M., & Juergensmeyer, M. (2010). Buddhist Warfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer, M. (2003). Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of religious violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellenbach, K.v. (forthcoming). Notes on the Christian battle to end the “abortion holocaust” In R. Ruard Ganzevoort & Srdjan Sremac (Eds.), Religion and the Politics of (In)tolerance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P., & Drebing, C.E. (2002). Abuse and religious experience: A study of religiously committed evangelical adults. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 5(3), 225-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejci, M.J., Thompson, K.M., Simonich, H., Crosby, R.D., Donaldson, M.A., Wonderlich, S.A., & Mitchelle, J.E. (2004). Sexual trauma, spirituality, and psychopathology. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 13(2), 85-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruk, M.R., Meelis, W., Halsz, J., & Haller, J. (2004). Fast positive feedback between the adrenocortical stress response and a brain mechanism involved in aggressive behavior. Behavioral Neuroscience 118(5), 1062-1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner-Hartman, A. (2002). Wider das Schweigen und Vergessen: Gewalt in der familie. Innsbruck: Tyrolia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad, S.E. (2004). Religion, violence, and peacemaking. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 43(3), 297-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selengut, C. (2003). Sacred fury: Understanding religious violence. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. (2013). The Malaysian dilemma: Negotiating sexual diversity in a Muslim-majority commonwealth state. In Corinne Lennox & Matthew Waite (Eds.), Human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity in the commonwealth: Struggles for decriminalisation and change (261-285). London: School of Advanced Study, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soler, H., Vinayak, P., & Quadagno, D. (2000). Biosocial aspects of domestic violence. Psychoneuroendocrinology 25(7), 721-739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (1996). The rise of Christianity: A sociologist reconsiders history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Orozco, M.M., & Robben, A.C.G.M. (2000). Interdisciplinary perspectives on violence and trauma. In A.C.G.M. Robben & M.M. Suárez-Orozco (Eds.), Cultures under siege: Collective violence and trauma. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J.T., & Felson, R.B. (1995). Violence, aggression, and coercive actions. Washington DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, R.G., & Calhoun, L.G. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of posttraumatic growth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twemlow, S. (2000). The roots of violence: converging psychoanalytic explanatory models for power struggles and violence in schools. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 69(4), 741-785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, R. (2016). World prison population list (eleventh edition). Retrieved April 17, 2016 from http://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/world_prison_population_list_11th_edition.pdf

  • Wulff, D.M. (1997). Psychology of religion: classic and contemporary. Second Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Ruard Ganzevoort .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ganzevoort, R.R. (2017). The Drama Triangle of Religion and Violence. In: Aslan, E., Hermansen, M. (eds) Religion and Violence . Wiener Beiträge zur Islamforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18302-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18302-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-18301-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-18302-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics