Skip to main content

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Urology: Timing, Dosing, and Duration Studies with special reference to High-risk conditions

  • Chapter
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Urology with special reference to the new Quinolones

Part of the book series: Fortschritte der Urologie und Nephrologie ((2824,volume 27))

Summary

A study in guinea pigs was performed to investigate the importance of timing, dosage, and duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in urologic surgery. To simulate highrisk conditions, in one group a foreign body was implanted subcutaneously. The prostate and one kidney were cauterized and bacteremia was induced by intravenous injection of Escherichia coli solution. Various ciprofloxacin regimen were tested.

The results indicate that antimicrobial prophylaxis is beneficial only if administered before or shortly after surgery. Full therapeutic dosage may not be necessary for prophylactic efficacy. Single dose prophylaxis was as effective as multiple doses. Foreign body infection could be prevented by single-dose prophylaxis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burke JF (1961) The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 50:161–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kunin CM, Johansen KS, Worning AM, Daschner FD (1990) Report of a symposium on use and abuse of antibiotics worldwide. Rev Infect Dis 12:12–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zimmerli W, Zak O, Vosbeck K. (1985) Experimental hematogenous infection of subcutanously implanted foreign bodies. Scand J Infect Dis 17: 303–310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sullivan NM, Sutter VL, Finegold SM (1975) Practical aerobic membrane filtration blood culture technique: Development of procedure. J Clin Microbiol 1: 30–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nielsen OS, Madsen PO (1982) Importance and timing of prophylactic antibiotics in urology with a special reference to growth and kill rates of E. coli in genitourinary organs. J Urol 123: 608–614

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaiser AB (1986) Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. N Engl J Med 315:1129–1138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Larsen EH, Gasser TC, Madsen PO (1986) Antimicrobial prophylaxis in urologie surgery. Urol Clin N Am 13: 591–604

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy DM, Stassen L, Carr ME, Gillespie WA, Cafferkey MT, Falkiner FR (1984) Bactaeremia during prostatectomy and other transurethral operations: influence of timing of antibiotic administration. J Clin Pathol 37:673–676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson MRG, Arudpragasam ST, Sahgal SM, Cross RJ, Akdas A, Fittal B, Sibbald R (1982) Bactaeremia resulting from prostatic surgery: the source of bacteria. Br J Urol 54: 542–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nielsen KT, Madsen PO (1989) Quinolones in Urology. Urol Res 17:117–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Malinverni R, Francioli PB, Glauser MP (1987) Comparison of single and multiple doses of prophylactic antibiotics in experimental streptococcus endocarditis. Circulation 76: 376–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hargreave TB, Gould JC, Kinninmonth AWG, Jeffrey RR, Varma JS, Macintyre CCA, Elton RA, Chisholm GD (1984) A randomized trial of 48 hours of prophylactic cefotaxime versus single dose in transurethral prostatic surgery. J Antimicrob Chemother 14 (suppl B): 263–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grabe M, Forsgren A, Björk T, Hellsten S (1987) Controlled trial of a short and a prolonged course with ciprofloxacin in patients undergoing transurethral prostatic surgery. Eur J Clin Microbiol 6:11–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Widmer AF, Wiestner A, Frei R, Zimmerli W (1991) Killing of nongrowing and adherent Escherichia coli determines drug efficacy in device-related infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35:741–746

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hooper DC, Wolfson JS (1991) Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents. N Engl J Med 324: 384–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gasser TC, Graversen PH, Madsen PO (1987) Fleroxacin (Ro 23–6240) distribution in canine prostatic tissue and fluids. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 31:1010–1013

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nickel JC, Heaton J, Morales A, Costerton JW (1986) Bacterial biofilm in persistent penile pros- thesis-associated infection. J Urol 135: 586–588

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Dr. Dietrich SteinkopffVerlag & Co. KG, Darmstadt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gasser, T.C., Madsen, P.O. (1992). Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Urology: Timing, Dosing, and Duration Studies with special reference to High-risk conditions. In: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Urology with special reference to the new Quinolones. Fortschritte der Urologie und Nephrologie, vol 27. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85422-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85422-4_15

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-0942-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-85422-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics